← Back to list

2003 Nissan Sentra 2.5L P0011 and P0300 Codes: Valve Over-tightening or Timing Issue? Warranty Engine Rebuild Concerns

Model: 2003 nissan sentra 2.5 Fault Code: P0011 Posted: 2009-12-13 21:48

I recently purchased a rebuilt 2.5L engine for my 2003 Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec V and had it installed by a local mechanic. Since installation, the vehicle has exhibited rough idling—stalling at idle and barely staying running below 1000 RPM. Above 1500 RPM, it runs smoothly. The onboard diagnostics show persistent codes P0011 (Camshaft Position Sensor Circuit Malfunction) and P0300 (Random/Multiple Misfire Detected). The dealership claims the valves were overtightened during reassembly, which they say prevents proper opening and causes a lean condition. However, I’ve noticed inconsistencies in their diagnosis: they did not mention timing issues or any problems with camshaft alignment during their engine inspection. They are now recommending a full replacement of valve and timing components—estimated at $2400—without providing clear evidence or diagnostic data. I previously experienced similar symptoms on the original engine, which failed due to head gasket and rod bearing failure. That engine was repaired by another dealership. I took this rebuilt unit to the dealer for warranty work because of concerns about internal mechanical defects. The local mechanic only handled installation and did not perform electronic diagnostics or internal inspections. My key questions: Can I trust the dealership’s claim that valve over-tightening is causing the issue? Does a timing-related problem explain both P0011 and P0300, especially given the symptom profile (stable at higher RPMs)? What specific tests should be performed to verify whether the engine rebuild has proper camshaft alignment or valve train function? I’m seeking reliable technical input before deciding whether to proceed with warranty return or accept a full hardware replacement.

Related fault codes
P0011P0300
Comments (7)
Anonymous 2009-12-14 06:03

The inconsistency you're seeing between this forum and the dealership may stem from different diagnostic approaches. If the engine was rebuilt by one party and installed by another, why is it now at the dealer? Why aren't the original installer or the rebuild shop involved in resolving the issue? This raises questions about accountability and transparency.

Anonymous 2009-12-14 13:59

I don’t mean the forum data is incorrect—just that the dealership’s current diagnosis lacks detail. They’ve disassembled the engine but haven’t mentioned any timing issues or valve train problems beyond claiming valves were overtightened. Since I had no access to electronic diagnostics during installation, I didn’t involve the local mechanic further. My agreement was limited to correct engine installation. The builder offers to send replacement hardware if needed—I’m now evaluating whether this is truly a mechanical issue or something else. Can we trust their explanation for P0011 and P0300? Is timing a likely root cause?

Anonymous 2009-12-14 21:04

It’s possible the dealer is diagnosing based on assumptions rather than verified data. For a fresh rebuild, camshaft timing should be carefully checked—incorrect setup or poor belt tensioner quality can lead to timing errors. However, at idle, low vacuum and rough running are more likely signs of a lean condition or misfire. While timing issues could contribute, they typically affect the entire RPM range. Without clear diagnostic data, it’s hard to confirm whether timing is truly the root cause. I’d suggest checking exhaust backpressure, fuel delivery, and sensor readings before concluding it's a timing problem.

Anonymous 2009-12-15 14:24

I believe the dealership may be pushing a high-cost solution for financial gain. The site information isn’t wrong—my own testing showed no coil pack issues. During my first visit, the master technician confirmed only idle lean symptoms. If valves were truly causing misfires, I would expect misfiring across all RPMs—not just at idle. Since it runs fine above 1500 RPM, this strongly suggests a timing or sensor issue rather than widespread valve problems. I’m looking for alternative diagnostics before sending the engine back under warranty.

Anonymous 2009-12-15 17:40

It seems the dealer is evaluating issues that may have been missed during prior work—especially given it’s a warranty-rebuilt engine. Valve tightness typically causes poor idle but improves with RPM increase, which matches your symptom profile. However, I’ve seen older V8s with hydraulic lifters set too tightly still revving well at higher speeds. This suggests the issue might not be solely valve-related. A technician who can rebuild an engine but cannot get it to run properly or clear codes may lack sufficient expertise. Have others checked for exhaust backpressure or fuel delivery issues? What does your idle vacuum gauge show—does it fluctuate or surge?

Anonymous 2009-12-15 21:53

The original engine failed due to head gasket and rod bearing failure, which occurred after normal operation. This rebuilt engine comes from a different vehicle but is the same model. The original engine ran fine except for knock due to worn bearings. I’m concerned that valve over-tightening might be the root cause—but I want confirmation before proceeding. The service manager didn’t express strong confidence in their diagnosis. What specific tests should I ask for—such as camshaft position verification, vacuum readings, or sensor calibration—to identify flaws in the rebuild process?

Anonymous 2010-02-02 12:17

I’d appreciate guidance on what diagnostic procedures to request—such as a full valve train inspection, timing belt alignment check, and sensor signal analysis—to validate whether the engine rebuild has been properly executed.