2003 Nissan Sentra 2.5L P0011 and P0300 Codes: Valve Over-tightening or Timing Issue? Warranty Engine Rebuild Concerns
I recently purchased a rebuilt 2.5L engine for my 2003 Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec V and had it installed by a local mechanic. Since installation, the vehicle has exhibited rough idling—stalling at idle and barely staying running below 1000 RPM. Above 1500 RPM, it runs smoothly. The onboard diagnostics show persistent codes P0011 (Camshaft Position Sensor Circuit Malfunction) and P0300 (Random/Multiple Misfire Detected). The dealership claims the valves were overtightened during reassembly, which they say prevents proper opening and causes a lean condition. However, I’ve noticed inconsistencies in their diagnosis: they did not mention timing issues or any problems with camshaft alignment during their engine inspection. They are now recommending a full replacement of valve and timing components—estimated at $2400—without providing clear evidence or diagnostic data. I previously experienced similar symptoms on the original engine, which failed due to head gasket and rod bearing failure. That engine was repaired by another dealership. I took this rebuilt unit to the dealer for warranty work because of concerns about internal mechanical defects. The local mechanic only handled installation and did not perform electronic diagnostics or internal inspections. My key questions: Can I trust the dealership’s claim that valve over-tightening is causing the issue? Does a timing-related problem explain both P0011 and P0300, especially given the symptom profile (stable at higher RPMs)? What specific tests should be performed to verify whether the engine rebuild has proper camshaft alignment or valve train function? I’m seeking reliable technical input before deciding whether to proceed with warranty return or accept a full hardware replacement.
The inconsistency you're seeing between this forum and the dealership may stem from different diagnostic approaches. If the engine was rebuilt by one party and installed by another, why is it now at the dealer? Why aren't the original installer or the rebuild shop involved in resolving the issue? This raises questions about accountability and transparency.