U013187 - U013187 Lost Communication with EPS (Electric Power Steering) Module (Scheme 2)

Fault code information

Fault Depth Definition

U013187 communication loss with EPS (Electric Power Steering) module, this fault code represents a data link interruption of key nodes in the vehicle network communication system. In the overall electronic architecture, EPS (Electronic Power Steering) controller as the core control unit of the power steering system needs to interact in real time with other systems (such as Blind Spot Monitoring System, Body Control Module BCM, etc.) through internal or external data bus (such as CAN Bus). The setting of this fault code means that the main control unit cannot receive effective monitoring messages from the EPS module within a preset diagnostic window, or the continuity of data flow from the EPS module does not meet system safety logic requirements. Such communication failures may cause the whole vehicle domain controller to misjudge the steering assist status, thereby affecting the stability monitoring function of the vehicle dynamic system.

Common Fault Symptoms

When U013187 code is recorded and is in current fault state, drivers or vehicle monitoring systems can observe the following specific physical manifestations and system feedback:

  • Partial failure of Blind Spot Monitoring System functions: Due to EPS module communication interruption, steering assist signals or body perception network related to BLIS cannot complete information handshake, causing the system unable to provide accurate warnings in certain areas.
  • Abnormal dashboard fault indicator lights: The vehicle diagnostic gateway may illuminate communication fault lamps but will not be accompanied by motor abnormal sounds or sticking specific to EPS system, mainly manifested as a silent data loss status.

Core Fault Cause Analysis

The root cause of the failure focuses on hardware component integrity, physical connection media and control logic state in three dimensions, specifically classified as follows:

  • Electronic Power Steering Controller Failure (Hardware Component): The communication module or main processor inside the EPS (Electric Power Steering) controller may fail abnormally, causing it unable to send expected monitoring messages according to protocol. In addition, rear left radar failure may also affect the stability of communication link through the same network topology; if this node is viewed as a related node within the EPS diagnostic domain, its failure signal may be mapped to this code.
  • Harness or Connector Failure (Wiring and Connection): Includes physical link problems between connecting controller and gateway/ECU. Specifically involves short circuit, open circuit or insulation layer damage inside harness, as well as connector terminal poor contact, pin oxidation and other physical connection failures causing signal transmission obstruction. At the same time, fuse failure is also one of the key reasons leading to unstable voltage input thus triggering electrical communication interruption.
  • Controller Logic and Network Status (Control Unit): Involves judgment of network health status of public CAN bus. If system detects that public CAN bus has not entered busoff state but continuously loses messages, it determines as network level rather than physical layer fault alone. At the same time, factory mode off state and normal与否 of BCM retight notification signal belong to control unit software logic level judgment conditions.

Technical Monitoring and Trigger Logic

The determination logic of this failure follows strict time sequence monitoring mechanism to ensure minimum false alarm and guarantee system safety, specific technical parameters and monitoring thresholds as follows:

  • Message Loss Judgment Threshold: System only activates fault storage logic after any monitoring message loses continuously $10$ times. This counting mechanism is used to exclude instantaneous signal interference.
  • Power Supply Voltage Monitoring Range: Fault detection only conducted when controller voltage is within effective working range of $9V$~$16V$. This voltage interval ensures that electronic control unit (ECU) power management logic is in normal wake-up state, excluding misjudgment caused by low voltage power loss or high voltage surge.
  • Time Window and Initialization Conditions: Monitoring starts after $3s$ following on-power initialization completion. Fault code recorded officially only after service detection DTC and satisfying $3s$ delay to allow system to complete self-check process.
  • Network Status Constraints: Triggering this fault determination, public CAN bus must remain active, not entered busoff state. This means network is not completely paralyzed, just specific node communication timeout.
  • Software Mode and Signal Synchronization: Diagnosis only conducted in Production Mode Off state, and judgment must complete before receiving BCM's retight notification signal. This ensures failure occurs during vehicle normal operation or regular power-off process, rather than production test environment status.
Meaning: -
Common causes:

cause the whole vehicle domain controller to misjudge the steering assist status, thereby affecting the stability monitoring function of the vehicle dynamic system.

Common Fault Symptoms

When U013187 code is recorded and is in current fault state, drivers or vehicle monitoring systems can observe the following specific physical manifestations and system feedback:

  • Partial failure of Blind Spot Monitoring System functions: Due to EPS module communication interruption, steering assist signals or body perception network related to BLIS cannot complete information handshake, causing the system unable to provide accurate warnings in certain areas.
  • Abnormal dashboard fault indicator lights: The vehicle diagnostic gateway may illuminate communication fault lamps but will not be accompanied by motor abnormal sounds or sticking specific to EPS system, mainly manifested as a silent data loss status.

Core Fault Cause Analysis

The root cause of the failure focuses on hardware component integrity, physical connection media and control logic state in three dimensions, specifically classified as follows:

  • Electronic Power Steering Controller Failure (Hardware Component): The communication module or main processor inside the EPS (Electric Power Steering) controller may fail abnormally, causing it unable to send expected monitoring messages according to protocol. In addition, rear left radar failure may also affect the stability of communication link through the same network topology; if this node is viewed as a related node within the EPS diagnostic domain, its failure signal may be mapped to this code.
  • Harness or Connector Failure (Wiring and Connection): Includes physical link problems between connecting controller and gateway/ECU. Specifically involves short circuit, open circuit or insulation layer damage inside harness, as well as connector terminal poor contact, pin oxidation and other physical connection failures causing signal transmission obstruction. At the same time, fuse failure is also one of the key reasons leading to unstable voltage input thus triggering electrical communication interruption.
  • Controller Logic and Network Status (Control Unit): Involves judgment of network health status of public CAN bus. If system detects that public CAN bus has not entered busoff state but continuously loses messages, it determines as network level rather than physical layer fault alone. At the same time, factory mode off state and normal与否 of BCM retight notification signal belong to control unit software logic level judgment conditions.

Technical Monitoring and Trigger Logic

The determination logic of this failure follows strict time sequence monitoring mechanism to ensure minimum false alarm and guarantee system safety, specific technical parameters and monitoring thresholds as follows:

  • Message Loss Judgment Threshold: System only activates fault storage logic after any monitoring message loses continuously $10$ times. This counting mechanism is used to exclude instantaneous signal interference.
  • Power Supply Voltage Monitoring Range: Fault detection only conducted when controller voltage is within effective working range of $9V$~$16V$. This voltage interval ensures that electronic control unit (ECU) power management logic is in normal wake-up state, excluding misjudgment caused by low voltage power loss or high voltage surge.
  • Time Window and Initialization Conditions: Monitoring starts after $3s$ following on-power initialization completion. Fault code recorded officially only after service detection DTC and satisfying $3s$ delay to allow system to complete self-check process.
  • Network Status Constraints: Triggering this fault determination, public CAN bus must remain active, not entered busoff state. This means network is not completely paralyzed, just specific node communication timeout.
  • Software Mode and Signal Synchronization:
Basic diagnosis:

diagnostic window, or the continuity of data flow from the EPS module does not meet system safety logic requirements. Such communication failures may cause the whole vehicle domain controller to misjudge the steering assist status, thereby affecting the stability monitoring function of the vehicle dynamic system.

Common Fault Symptoms

When U013187 code is recorded and is in current fault state, drivers or vehicle monitoring systems can observe the following specific physical manifestations and system feedback:

  • Partial failure of Blind Spot Monitoring System functions: Due to EPS module communication interruption, steering assist signals or body perception network related to BLIS cannot complete information handshake, causing the system unable to provide accurate warnings in certain areas.
  • Abnormal dashboard fault indicator lights: The vehicle diagnostic gateway may illuminate communication fault lamps but will not be accompanied by motor abnormal sounds or sticking specific to EPS system, mainly manifested as a silent data loss status.

Core Fault Cause Analysis

The root cause of the failure focuses on hardware component integrity, physical connection media and control logic state in three dimensions, specifically classified as follows:

  • Electronic Power Steering Controller Failure (Hardware Component): The communication module or main processor inside the EPS (Electric Power Steering) controller may fail abnormally, causing it unable to send expected monitoring messages according to protocol. In addition, rear left radar failure may also affect the stability of communication link through the same network topology; if this node is viewed as a related node within the EPS diagnostic domain, its failure signal may be mapped to this code.
  • Harness or Connector Failure (Wiring and Connection): Includes physical link problems between connecting controller and gateway/ECU. Specifically involves short circuit, open circuit or insulation layer damage inside harness, as well as connector terminal poor contact, pin oxidation and other physical connection failures causing signal transmission obstruction. At the same time, fuse failure is also one of the key reasons leading to unstable voltage input thus triggering electrical communication interruption.
  • Controller Logic and Network Status (Control Unit): Involves judgment of network health status of public CAN bus. If system detects that public CAN bus has not entered busoff state but continuously loses messages, it determines as network level rather than physical layer fault alone. At the same time, factory mode off state and normal与否 of BCM retight notification signal belong to control unit software logic level judgment conditions.

Technical Monitoring and Trigger Logic

The determination logic of this failure follows strict time sequence monitoring mechanism to ensure minimum false alarm and guarantee system safety, specific technical parameters and monitoring thresholds as follows:

  • Message Loss Judgment Threshold: System only activates fault storage logic after any monitoring message loses continuously $10$ times. This counting mechanism is used to exclude instantaneous signal interference.
  • Power Supply Voltage Monitoring Range: Fault detection only conducted when controller voltage is within effective working range of $9V$~$16V$. This voltage interval ensures that electronic control unit (ECU) power management logic is in normal wake-up state, excluding misjudgment caused by low voltage power loss or high voltage surge.
  • Time Window and Initialization Conditions: Monitoring starts after $3s$ following on-power initialization completion. Fault code recorded officially only after service detection DTC and satisfying $3s$ delay to allow system to complete self-check process.
  • Network Status Constraints: Triggering this fault determination, public CAN bus must remain active, not entered busoff state. This means network is not completely paralyzed, just specific node communication timeout.
  • Software Mode and Signal Synchronization:
Repair cases
Related fault codes