U013400 - U013400 Lost Communication with EPS (Electric Power Steering) Module (Scheme 2)

Fault code information

U013400 Communication Loss with EPS (Electric Power Steering) Module Repair Guide (Plan B) Technical Explanation

Fault Severity Definition

U013400 refers to abnormal data communication interruption established between the controller responsible for ADAS or whole vehicle integration control and the EPS (Electric Power Steering) module within the vehicle's network communication system. In modern onboard Ethernet or CAN bus architectures, this DTC signifies that the control unit cannot receive periodic heartbeat messages from the EPS module or critical function response data. This fault not only involves a single physical connection issue but also concerns the safety redundancy verification mechanism during vehicle dynamic driving. When the system judges the communication link failure, the relevant domain controller will initiate fault protection strategies, causing degradation of partial functions dependent on steering signals or collaborative control, which belongs to typical network communication interruption DTC (Diagnostic Trouble Code).

Common Fault Symptoms

The fault may provide feedback to users through dashboard indicator lights or function restrictions during driving, with specific symptom manifestations including but not limited to:

  • ACC System Performance Limited: ACC (Adaptive Cruise Control) system partial functionality failure, which may cause the vehicle to be unable to automatically adjust speed or stop automatic following under specific conditions.
  • Steering Assist Function Fluctuation: EPS assist force may abnormally change during driving, or the steering wheel appears irregular torque feedback.
  • System Reset and Warning: Dashboard may light up network communication related fault indicator lights (such as "Service Engine Soon" or specific ADAS warning lights).
  • Function Delay Response: Functions involving steering signal and radar data fusion may appear brief command execution delay or logic conflict.

Core Fault Cause Analysis

Based on the fault mechanism, this communication loss phenomenon can be attributed to systematic problems in the following three dimensions, requiring investigation combined with specific control units:

  • Hardware Component Failure: Mainly points to physical failure of key electronic control units.
    • Electronic Power Steering Controller Failure: The EPS module internal processor or gateway interface chip may be damaged, leading to inability to send data messages outward.
    • Pre-mounted Millimeter Wave Radar Failure: As a system collaborative node, radar controller abnormality may cause it to be unable to correctly forward EPS related messages or actively trigger communication interruption protection.
  • Line and Connector Anomaly: Involves physical connection problems concerning power transmission and signal integrity.
    • Fuse Failure: Fuse blown for the EPS module or its communication power circuit, leading to control unit power off or reset.
    • Wiring or Connector Failure: CAN bus physical wiring broken, shield layer damaged, or connector terminal withdrawal/corrosion, causing signal transmission open or short circuit.
  • Controller Logic Calculation Error: Involves software state machine or mode management.
    • Control Unit Internal Logic: Controller fails to correctly identify network status, leading to false reporting communication loss, or in specific function suppression mode (e.g., Factory mode) without exiting correctly.

Technical Monitoring and Trigger Logic

Generation of this fault code is based on strict monitoring strategies. The system will only record a diagnostic code when specific electrical conditions, time windows, and bus statuses are met, to prevent intermittent interference from being misjudged as hardware faults. The specific trigger judgment logic is as follows:

  • Monitoring Target:

    • Communication Message Integrity: For any predefined monitoring message (Monitoring Message), the system continuously counts loss. Only when the same monitoring message is consecutively lost $10$ times does it meet the preliminary loss threshold condition.
    • Electrical State Monitoring: System continuously monitors controller power input voltage, ensuring communication judgment within standard operating voltage range of $9V$~ $16V$.
  • Condition and Timing Constraints:

    • Initialization Delay: The fault judgment timer window must start calculating after vehicle power on initialization completion for $3s$, ensuring system enters normal working state (Warm Start) before monitoring messages.
    • Bus State Check: Trigger requirement public CAN bus not enter busoff status. If bus crashed, will prioritize record bus related DTC rather than specific module communication loss.
    • Mode and Interaction Constraints:
      • System must be in non-factory mode (Factory mode off).
      • Ensure no power off notification received from BCM (Body Control Module), prevent false reporting during battery management logic switch period.
      • After Service Detection confirms DTC existence, need $3s$ confirmation cycle before formally solidifying fault code and lighting indicator light.

This technical explanation aims to provide professional analysis on U013400 fault principles; all voltage values and time thresholds strictly follow original monitoring logic settings.

Meaning: -
Common causes:

cause the vehicle to be unable to automatically adjust speed or stop automatic following under specific conditions.

  • Steering Assist Function Fluctuation: EPS assist force may abnormally change during driving, or the steering wheel appears irregular torque feedback.
  • System Reset and Warning: Dashboard may light up network communication related fault indicator lights (such as "Service Engine Soon" or specific ADAS warning lights).
  • Function Delay Response: Functions involving steering signal and radar data fusion may appear brief command execution delay or logic conflict.

Core Fault Cause Analysis

Based on the fault mechanism, this communication loss phenomenon can be attributed to systematic problems in the following three dimensions, requiring investigation combined with specific control units:

  • Hardware Component Failure: Mainly points to physical failure of key electronic control units.
  • Electronic Power Steering Controller Failure: The EPS module internal processor or gateway interface chip may be damaged, leading to inability to send data messages outward.
  • Pre-mounted Millimeter Wave Radar Failure: As a system collaborative node, radar controller abnormality may cause it to be unable to correctly forward EPS related messages or actively trigger communication interruption protection.
  • Line and Connector Anomaly: Involves physical connection problems concerning power transmission and signal integrity.
  • Fuse Failure: Fuse blown for the EPS module or its communication power circuit, leading to control unit power off or reset.
  • Wiring or Connector Failure: CAN bus physical wiring broken, shield layer damaged, or connector terminal withdrawal/corrosion, causing signal transmission open or short circuit.
  • Controller Logic Calculation Error: Involves software state machine or mode management.
  • Control Unit Internal Logic: Controller fails to correctly identify network status, leading to false reporting communication loss, or in specific function suppression mode (e.g., Factory mode) without exiting correctly.

Technical Monitoring and Trigger Logic

Generation of this fault code is based on strict monitoring strategies. The system will only record a diagnostic code when specific electrical conditions, time windows, and bus statuses are met, to prevent intermittent interference from being misjudged as hardware faults. The specific trigger judgment logic is as follows:

  • Monitoring Target:
  • Communication Message Integrity: For any predefined monitoring message (Monitoring Message), the system continuously counts loss. Only when the same monitoring message is consecutively lost $10$ times does it meet the preliminary loss threshold condition.
  • Electrical State Monitoring: System continuously monitors controller power input voltage, ensuring communication judgment within standard operating voltage range of $9V$~ $16V$.
  • Condition and Timing Constraints:
  • Initialization Delay: The fault judgment timer window must start calculating after vehicle power on initialization completion for $3s$, ensuring system enters normal working state (Warm Start) before monitoring messages.
  • Bus State Check: Trigger requirement public CAN bus not enter busoff status. If bus crashed, will prioritize record bus related DTC rather than specific module communication loss.
  • Mode and Interaction Constraints:
  • System must be in non-factory mode (Factory mode off).
  • Ensure no power off notification received from BCM (Body Control Module), prevent false reporting during battery management logic switch period.
  • After Service Detection confirms DTC existence, need $3s$ confirmation cycle before formally solidifying fault code and lighting indicator light. This technical explanation aims to provide professional analysis on U013400 fault principles; all voltage values and time thresholds strictly follow original monitoring logic settings.
Basic diagnosis:

Diagnostic Trouble Code).

Common Fault Symptoms

The fault may provide feedback to users through dashboard indicator lights or function restrictions during driving, with specific symptom manifestations including but not limited to:

  • ACC System Performance Limited: ACC (Adaptive Cruise Control) system partial functionality failure, which may cause the vehicle to be unable to automatically adjust speed or stop automatic following under specific conditions.
  • Steering Assist Function Fluctuation: EPS assist force may abnormally change during driving, or the steering wheel appears irregular torque feedback.
  • System Reset and Warning: Dashboard may light up network communication related fault indicator lights (such as "Service Engine Soon" or specific ADAS warning lights).
  • Function Delay Response: Functions involving steering signal and radar data fusion may appear brief command execution delay or logic conflict.

Core Fault Cause Analysis

Based on the fault mechanism, this communication loss phenomenon can be attributed to systematic problems in the following three dimensions, requiring investigation combined with specific control units:

  • Hardware Component Failure: Mainly points to physical failure of key electronic control units.
  • Electronic Power Steering Controller Failure: The EPS module internal processor or gateway interface chip may be damaged, leading to inability to send data messages outward.
  • Pre-mounted Millimeter Wave Radar Failure: As a system collaborative node, radar controller abnormality may cause it to be unable to correctly forward EPS related messages or actively trigger communication interruption protection.
  • Line and Connector Anomaly: Involves physical connection problems concerning power transmission and signal integrity.
  • Fuse Failure: Fuse blown for the EPS module or its communication power circuit, leading to control unit power off or reset.
  • Wiring or Connector Failure: CAN bus physical wiring broken, shield layer damaged, or connector terminal withdrawal/corrosion, causing signal transmission open or short circuit.
  • Controller Logic Calculation Error: Involves software state machine or mode management.
  • Control Unit Internal Logic: Controller fails to correctly identify network status, leading to false reporting communication loss, or in specific function suppression mode (e.g., Factory mode) without exiting correctly.

Technical Monitoring and Trigger Logic

Generation of this fault code is based on strict monitoring strategies. The system will only record a diagnostic code when specific electrical conditions, time windows, and bus statuses are met, to prevent intermittent interference from being misjudged as hardware faults. The specific trigger judgment logic is as follows:

  • Monitoring Target:
  • Communication Message Integrity: For any predefined monitoring message (Monitoring Message), the system continuously counts loss. Only when the same monitoring message is consecutively lost $10$ times does it meet the preliminary loss threshold condition.
  • Electrical State Monitoring: System continuously monitors controller power input voltage, ensuring communication judgment within standard operating voltage range of $9V$~ $16V$.
  • Condition and Timing Constraints:
  • Initialization Delay: The fault judgment timer window must start calculating after vehicle power on initialization completion for $3s$, ensuring system enters normal working state (Warm Start) before monitoring messages.
  • Bus State Check: Trigger requirement public CAN bus not enter busoff status. If bus crashed, will prioritize record bus related DTC rather than specific module communication loss.
  • Mode and Interaction Constraints:
  • System must be in non-factory mode (Factory mode off).
  • Ensure no power off notification received from BCM (Body Control Module), prevent false reporting during battery management logic switch period.
  • After Service Detection confirms DTC existence, need $3s$ confirmation cycle before formally solidifying fault code and lighting indicator light. This technical explanation aims to provide professional analysis on U013400 fault principles; all voltage values and time thresholds strictly follow original monitoring logic settings.
Repair cases
Related fault codes