← Back to topic list

Prediction: Austin tests will fail.

MountainMark | 2025-06-23 15:16 | 457 views

I predict the Austin trial will fail for two reasons: 1. We all know that their "Self Driving (supervised)" is a long way from "Self-driving". 2. Austin, a traditionally blue city (compared, at least to most of TX), will reject putting money in Elon's pockets. Once the streamers and fanboys get their fill of doing rides for the sake of content creation, then most of the people will reject simply ordering a ride on the service. They will choose to not enrich Elon. Thoughts?

Comments (133)
Crutchduck 2025-06-23 15:19

Will selfdrive fail, yes. Will tesla fail no to many clowns are committed to pumping it up

ManifestDestinysChld 2025-06-23 15:20

Of course they will. I assume Elon chose Austin because he has to operate within the safe confines of TX where the legislature will protect him, but he knows failure is inevitable and he wants to be able to blame liberals so he can maintain plausible deniability for the right-wing rubes he's grifting now.

meteoraln 2025-06-23 15:21

Your predicitions only matter if you have skin in the game.

Prepaid_tomato 2025-06-23 15:22

As it should.

Ok_Excitement725 2025-06-23 15:23

Yup. I give it a couple weeks til they have enough close calls or actual accidents…it will be “paused” but they will hail it as a wildly successful trial, the influencer morons will post about how revolutionary it is and the TesBros who invest in the company will once again pump the stock price up to ridiculous levels.

Both_Sundae2695 2025-06-23 15:24

It will work, in geofenced areas, under ideal weather conditions, with remote drivers. Never true level 4 with just cameras.

sffunfun 2025-06-23 15:24

They might even k*ll a couple of them during testing. Fanboys will still fanboy.

Crutchduck 2025-06-23 15:25

there will definitely be a fatality.

sffunfun 2025-06-23 15:25

Ok how about first fatal accident 100 days after 100 cars on the road? I’ll wager real money. Also, I was thinking of revising my prediction down to first fatal accident within 100 days, any number of cars, seeing how badly things are going.

Searching_f0r_life 2025-06-23 15:25

I don't even consider it a launch...who is using the service after the fanboys fly home? They need to focus on getting the driver out the front seat, besides expanding elsewhere.. Learn to walk before you can run

babypho 2025-06-23 15:26

I dont think it will. Mostly because Elon controls the narrative and can push it as a win regardless of the test results.

Moceannl 2025-06-23 15:28

If it won’t stop for fsd reasons, it will because of no demand. Area is too small, fanboys will dry out.

knightofterror 2025-06-23 15:28

If you drive in Austin, you’ve got skin in the game.

Puzzleheaded-Sea8340 2025-06-23 15:29

I think you’re right on. I’m trying to avoid making too many predictions based on what I know of full self driving because I haven’t used it in a couple of months… But man it was nowhere near unsupervised when I was using it in my trip to California.

creative_trading 2025-06-23 15:29

Even if self driving goes well and is as successful as Waymo in the long term Tesla stock is still overvalued. Google trades at a P/E ratio of less than 18 while Tesla's P/E Ratio is ten times that.

InvisibleBlueRobot 2025-06-23 15:29

The robocab test seems less than impressive at the moment.  How many years behind WAYMO is Tesla?  Will Tesla eventually need to give up on "camera only" self driving in favor of lidar/ radar? Musk's visual only navigation might eventually be great for slow moving humanoid robots, but it seems excessively dangerous at 50+ mph in some circumstances.  The Robotaxi test launch is avoiding  dangerous intersections, certain geographic areas, inclement weather today, but you can't do this for very long and still consider it useful.

BobbyKonker 2025-06-23 15:31

He died doing what he loved, simping for Musk.

sudopods 2025-06-23 15:32

First part yes. Second part no, people aren't going to reject a $4.20 taxi ride just to make a political statement. People care too much about pricing.

BobbyKonker 2025-06-23 15:33

I think it will be rejected purely on safety grounds and when the body count starts to get headlines it's done, then Tesla will then go in search of another victim city population.

FurryYokel 2025-06-23 15:35

Even worse if you’re a pedestrian in Austin.

XKeyscore666 2025-06-23 15:36

Even if they manage not to cause a spectacular crash, it will fail in the long run. The cab market is saturated. There’s a reason General Motors canceled their attempt at this. People at Tesla have tried to talk Elon out of this. I’m sure 99% of Elon’s attention on this project has gone to arguing with engineers who say that the signature cybercab hubcaps are impossible.

Kaputnik1 2025-06-23 15:36

Self driving is going nowhere, it's not practical, and I'll continue to die on that hill. It's pure futurism novelty. It's fluff. It offers no answers to the increasing problem of traffic, the tech is not even close, and even if it were, why not use rail?

Radarhog1976 2025-06-23 15:39

Tesla market cap up 125 BILLION just this morning. That’s more than robotaxis would generate profits in a decade! Short it

StanchoPanza 2025-06-23 15:39

why is Elon starting the trials in the MOST WOKE city in Texas?

SolutionWarm6576 2025-06-23 15:40

It doesn’t matter if they fail. It’s Tesla, nothing negative affects this stock. Bullish, lol.

Fun_Volume2150 2025-06-23 15:40

That price is probably not sustainable.

Dense_Substance7635 2025-06-23 15:41

It doesn’t matter … Elon will lie, strut around like a chicken and declare victory.

Spillz-2011 2025-06-23 15:41

They can’t maintain that price. They are losing money on every trip.

danrokk 2025-06-23 15:42

Well, current hype is primarily due to the fact that it's invite-only, so Tesla made sure it goes to right people.

dreadthripper 2025-06-23 15:42

This little pilot is the fulfillment of a decade of promises by Elon. It's the only thing that even remotely makes the 1T value of the company make sense.  My expectation: It will make some money but people will see it as unremarkable. They won't be able to expand as fast as they claim they can, wrecks and close calls will make people reluctant to ride, and it will limp along while more competitors emerge.

MountainMark 2025-06-23 15:43

I vacationed in California and was impressed by the quality of their roads. Everything was first class. If Tesla can't handle the amazing roads in CA, I don't see how their self-driving will every handle the asphalt pig-trails that cover the rural areas I grew up in.

Beezelbubba 2025-06-23 15:43

Except they fucked him by demandning L4 only for autonomous rides and the use of LIDAR and RADAR starting on 9/1/25 The law was passed and signed by the Gov. of Texas

First-Ad-7960 2025-06-23 15:44

Since the Texas legislature is in Austin maybe we will get an ironic moment where a Robotaxi crashes into some representative's car.

habfranco 2025-06-23 15:44

In one single day with only 10 vehicles there was already a scary move.

Lonely_Refuse4988 2025-06-23 15:44

And the fanboi cheerleaders will scream that it’s an A+ success when in fact it’s a marginal D- passing and actual failure in terms of true fully autonomous driving. 😂🤣🤷‍♂️

iIdentifyasGrinch 2025-06-23 15:45

In testing, Teslers failed to detect a 'Wile E. Coyote' painted landscape obstacle and dummies in the road during rain/fog conditions with its cameras

MountainMark 2025-06-23 15:46

The boundaries between L2, L3, & L4 are nebulous at best and he can declare L4 as done without much effort or oversite for accuracy.

Demonshaker 2025-06-23 15:48

In dense urban areas it makes sense. For everywhere else.....we are fat lazy americans who don't want to walk from a rail station to work/home/grocery store. We want to park 50 feet from the door of our location.

QuantumConversation 2025-06-23 15:50

Self driving itself is a total scam, whether or not Waymo or others can manage a few trips without killing someone. I drove a Tesla for 3.5 years. The company constantly hounded drivers to “buy” FSD for a measly $12K. I assume some idiots did so. I had advanced autopilot and the phantom braking and unreliability of it was shocking. In my view, mass transit would be a far better method of getting folks around than thousands of driverless cars struggling to stay between the lines. Not only does FSD not work, it’s also an idiotic concept.

CompoteDeep2016 2025-06-23 15:51

Your words in God's ear. I pray for it. Although I am agnostic 😂

SuperF91EX 2025-06-23 15:53

Quite a pump today, but robotaxi will eventually fail

FerragudoFred 2025-06-23 15:55

Did you see the video where the car stopped in the middle of the road to let the passengers out and then stayed for a good minute blocking traffic?

CompoteDeep2016 2025-06-23 15:56

This fucking exactly. But numbers don't count anymore. They started a trial with ten fucking cars in perfect conditions and already had some weird behavior of the cars. Stock goes up more than what BMW and Mercedes is worth combined...

Acrobatic_Code_7409 2025-06-23 15:57

Yeah Austin is a college town. Texas yes, but Blue Texas. Puzzling decision imo as well.

Pancheel 2025-06-23 15:57

Bold of you to assume they will generate profit in a decade.

frechundfrei 2025-06-23 15:57

10 vehicles? *snort*

GhostofBreadDragons 2025-06-23 15:58

lol they are up 10% on this news.  I kind of expected some sort of stock drop. They started late after two changes in time. This was the second time it was scheduled to happen this month and it required the safety rider.  Yes nothing crashed and Musk didn’t go into a paranoia drug infused rant but this wasn’t exactly a success either.  I have no idea how this was a positive showing.

[deleted] 2025-06-23 15:58

It clearly works well enough to pump the stock prior to a poor earnings report, which is what it’s needed for. If it fails aa a real business model, that’s just like hyperloop, Tesla Semi, and all the other junk hardware they push out. In other words, it doesn’t matter what happens to the service in 6 months unless it kills so many people that there’s public outrage. Killing less than 5 people won’t be a big enough deal, unfortunately.

boogermike 2025-06-23 16:00

Holy crap! PE is **194.40** right now (stock is way up for some weird reason). That is shockingly high. I am actually blown away from that, and anyone buying this stock is a fool (and buying a very over priced product).

[deleted] 2025-06-23 16:02

What a bold prediction 😂

Livinincrazytown 2025-06-23 16:03

In one day I’ve seen two videos now one where it drove on wrong side of rode and now one where it drops off passengers in the middle of the intersection. This is off what a few hundred miles? And the stock is up big today with this ridiculous rollout?!

Solopist112 2025-06-23 16:06

I predict he's going to kill a pedestrian.

Dubiousjinn 2025-06-23 16:18

TSLA to the moon on this news

AMD_711 2025-06-23 16:19

purpose of robotaxi is to keep the stock price and valuation high, not to actually make money. in that regard, the Austin launched is successful

larkinowl 2025-06-23 16:21

Can I just complain about the 80s rockstar album font they chose for Robotaxi? definitive proof that we are on the dumbest timeline

[deleted] 2025-06-23 16:22

[deleted]

hegenious 2025-06-23 16:23

I saw that FAIL and it was ludicrously over the top funny. All this time the Waymo’s are going ”meep meep!”.

habfranco 2025-06-23 16:25

Nope - do you have a link?

PM_TITS_FOR_KITTENS 2025-06-23 16:27

Are you not aware of how cheap it is to operate an electric vehicle? I highly doubt it will stay $4.20; that’s clearly just a joke for the initial testing launch. But I can’t see it becoming much more than that for a trip. I’d guess around $10. At that price, a few hours of driving would pay for the vehicles full range multiple times over. Waymo costs an average of $20 with Lyft and Uber around $16. They don’t have to offset the cost of the machinery required for a Waymo (while also not paying for the expensive af car needed) and don’t have to pay for a driver. Combine both those factors together and I’d bet almost 100% it’ll cost much lower than either of them even at launch. And naturally, people will choose the cheapest option (especially with how ridiculous tipping has become) so they’ll have customers as long as the product is available.

Radarhog1976 2025-06-23 16:32

PE is 210 now! Biggest balloon on Wall Street and the popping is soon!

Radarhog1976 2025-06-23 16:35

Market cap up 125 billion today. More than any profits this farce could ever realize!

Radarhog1976 2025-06-23 16:36

Higher than Ford and GM together! Short this scam!

Spillz-2011 2025-06-23 16:39

Well they have a safety driver. The minimum wage is $7.25, but in Austin people probably make more. Because they have 10 cars they probably have high demand per car, but if they scale at all cars will sit a lot on weekdays during work hours. I doubt they break even just on the driver let alone all the other costs like cleaning, charging, wear and tear etc.

[deleted] 2025-06-23 16:42

[removed]

RiseUpAndGetOut 2025-06-23 16:44

Does it actually mandate Lidar and/or radar? It's extremely unusual to specify a type of technology down to the component level. It's almost always an operating standard, feature or function to work within specified limits. E.g. an automatic speed limiter can be required by law, and its operation tested to a defined standard. But it won't specify ***how*** the speed limiter has to work.

PM_TITS_FOR_KITTENS 2025-06-23 16:49

They have a safety driver *right now* for monitoring safety. They said eventually once they’ve determined a safety monitor is no longer required, they won’t be in the car anymore. This is the same thing Waymo did during their initial launch tests before going full loose. As long as they hit those marks, your point won’t matter anymore (not to say it isn’t true for now, but that won’t be the case when they’re done testing if things go well). It has always been the plan to not have anyone in the car, same as any other company offering these services.

PM_TITS_FOR_KITTENS 2025-06-23 16:57

Love or hate the company, software has always been Teslas strong point. I personally feel like that will be a nonissue as long as they have the proper infrastructure for the vehicles to rotate to. But I could be wrong, sure. Can’t deny alternate possibilities. But the history points towards that direction for me.

noobgiraffe 2025-06-23 17:00

You're forgetting the car's depreciation. People are acting as if taxis was this insanely huge untapped market but it's not. It's hard business with huge upfront capital expenditures. Huge risk and very slow return on the investment.

PM_TITS_FOR_KITTENS 2025-06-23 17:10

Could you do me a favor and explain why you think the cars depreciation will be a large factor here? Let’s take a look at Waymo for a sec. They have to outright buy a vehicle (a Jaguar no less, NOT a cheap vehicle) and then add their hardware (tens of thousands of dollars in addition). They are currently operating at a level where they can sustain all these costs even with how expensive their cars and hardware is. Now consider Tesla. They straight up produce their cars themselves. This means no markups and their cars are far cheaper than the Jaguars Waymo buys. Plus, the hardware is so simple it costs next to nothing. I’d imagine the yearly depreciation of the car at that point affects it far less. Additionally, they’re already some of the cheapest cars to own so depreciation based on servicing the cars should be lower. Who in this situation needs to care more about the vehicles depreciation? There’s a clear winner here. Plus, because this software will be (presumably) released to cars millions of people already own, there’s a chance people can sign their own cars up as robotaxis with the requirement that a portion of the cost is paid to Tesla. Now they’re making money (even if it is a bit per ride) from vehicles that they don’t even deal with themselves. I’m just saying there’s a lot more scalability involved with the way Tesla *could* take the service. But will they hit the marks? Literally no one knows. I hope they do because I just think it’s cool as fuck, but if it were to crash and burn before it ever hits full release I wouldn’t be surprised since anything can happen. I’m just saying they have a massive opportunity and advantage if things work out

americansherlock201 2025-06-23 17:13

I have an equally as bold prediction: The sun will rise in the east and set in the west

Spillz-2011 2025-06-23 17:28

Well I would say it’s the stated plan to not have anyone in the car. They got their 10% stock bump from this. I think realistically musk is willing to lose money on this indefinitely since it boosts stock prices.

CloseToMyActualName 2025-06-23 17:34

I can't see them "failing" unless there's actually a Cruise like serious accident that forces a shut down. The worst, and frankly likely case for Tesla is they keep the safety drivers indefinitely. But they may need to move them to the driver's seat if they haven't built full controls into the passenger seat already.

UndertakerFred 2025-06-23 17:35

Middle of an INTERSECTION.

MarchMurky8649 2025-06-23 17:43

I honestly think they are unlikely to ever be able to get rid of the safety passenger in the car. Too much latency otherwise. In any case with 1+ Tesla staff per vehicle it'll never be profitable so therefore impossible to scale.

SkyHighFlyGuyOhMy 2025-06-23 17:44

https://www.reddit.com/r/RealTesla/s/NY490KV7yE Around 38:00 is where the ride happens. Can’t remember time stamp of stopping in the intersection.

MrGelowe 2025-06-23 17:44

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_pSZv6THfA&t=2284s

noobgiraffe 2025-06-23 17:50

Tesla would be selling cars at a loss if not for EV credits. So there is not a lot of margin to save. I just don't think it's a good buisenss for Tesla or Waymo. I think deprecation is a huge deal. Instead of selling a car you need to make the money back by using it as a taxi. Then you have a run down car that you can't sell for much. > released to cars millions of people already own, there’s a chance people can sign their own cars up as robotaxis with the requirement that a portion of the cost is paid to Tesla. Now they’re making money (even if it is a bit per ride) from vehicles that they don’t even deal with themselves. This will destroy margins. There is no scenario where every tesla owner makes considerable amounts of money. It's supply and demand. Basic law of economics. To be clear I'm not saying there is no money to be made. I just think it's not that much money.

MarchMurky8649 2025-06-23 17:57

Reading r/TeslaFSD and watching videos from yesterday causes me to think it is most unlikely it will be possible to get rid of the safety passenger in the foreseeable future. If anything I'd say the service is becoming more erratic.

Ok_Subject1265 2025-06-23 18:01

Maybe hot wheels will be have his service upgraded to “from the neck down.” Couldn’t happen to more deserving person honestly.

crlynstll 2025-06-23 18:22

Waymo is safe. The Tesla Taxis (TT) will be a complete shitshow that tech bros praise. I’m already dreading driving downtown and down S Lamar. The first self driving rideshare was so terrible that I wiped the name of the company from my brain. I saw multiple instances where these cars were dangerous. Why would TT be any different?

shambolic_panda 2025-06-23 18:47

My experience was different. I used the Tesla FSD when it was free. It was pretty awesome. It works fine except for a very few corner cases. Mass transit works in dense areas - when there is enough 'mass' that can 'transit'.

Nfuzzy 2025-06-23 19:17

Even if they didn't have a demand problem for rides, the number of available cars and profits (if any) per ride is so far from the stock price expectations that it can't be anything more than fraud and manipulation at this point.

Quercus_ 2025-06-23 19:27

They might pull off a limited conservative service, within the geomapped boundaries where they have done intensive mapping to discover intersections and situations they can't handle, so they geofence those off as well. But no more than that. The fact that they still have a safety driver in the right seat with a stop button, kind of tells you everything you need to know about how much they trust their own system.

pailhead011 2025-06-23 19:32

I don’t think they have to bother with conservatives. Elon went off the rails, the liberals are still buying Tesla left and right

kneejerk2022 2025-06-23 19:33

The whole driverless taxi is a novelty at best IMHO. I can see no added benefit for the consumer whether the taxi service they choose has a driver or not, apart from getting to say "future is cool". It reeks of silicon valley start-up BS, where the only money to be made is hyping the future to pump the stock.

BidAccomplished4641 2025-06-23 19:41

Maybe they could focus on a niche market, like event transportation… Charlottesville, J6, etc. they can put tiki torch holders on the sides of the cars.

boogermike 2025-06-23 20:13

I sold most of my stock. I'll sell the rest soon I think. That PE is outrageous.

JohnHazardWandering 2025-06-23 20:37

Markets can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent

sffunfun 2025-06-23 20:43

I hope it’s a fanboy and not some innocent person in another car.

JohnHazardWandering 2025-06-23 20:44

....and what has Texas done about guns after numerous school shootings? As long as Musk stays in the right's good graces, you'll see the typical mental gymnasts on Fox saying how people die all the time and it's not a big deal.

Das_KommenTier 2025-06-23 20:45

At this point it is just tragic. I‘m lacking a better adjective…but it’s definitely beyond funny.

Puzzleheaded-Sea8340 2025-06-23 20:46

Makes sense

JohnHazardWandering 2025-06-23 20:46

Once there is no safety driver, people will shit, piss and graffiti in those cars.

Fearless-Toe-4215 2025-06-23 20:47

Not sure trying an established Waymo city is the best idea.

[deleted] 2025-06-23 21:06

Agree with you 100%.

[deleted] 2025-06-23 21:11

It was a five lane intersection! Big Silverado has patience of a saint waiting for it to move. Passenger had to release it. Moron in passenger seat was a sitting duck. FFS 🤦‍♀️

Kaputnik1 2025-06-23 21:22

Indeed. Driving *to* the feedbag is peak American.

ChlorineQueen 2025-06-23 21:42

But Tesla generates profit right now

Youngnathan2011 2025-06-23 21:55

Only cause they sell carbon credits to other companies. That goes away, their profit is fucked

Ice-Negative 2025-06-23 22:02

They are not nebulous, they are very well defined.

neliz 2025-06-23 22:30

Tell me you know nothing about self driving, without saying you know nothing about self driving

AndSoISaysToTheGuy 2025-06-23 22:56

FSD (Double Secret Probation)

Necessary_Drawing214 2025-06-23 23:14

Be interesting to see what happens when people who want to vandalize Teslas have the opportunity to request a company owned one to come to them.

MountainMark 2025-06-23 23:14

His sales figure do not support that liberals are buying. EV sales are up *except* for Tesla.

YamaToraBro 2025-06-23 23:35

They tested for weeks in that area before that "invite only" event on top of having one "safety" driver and one "safety" monitor. Yet it can't handle a basic left turn without driving into oncoming traffic. Not surprising since it won't stop for a bus school with its stop sign out & lights on. The "safety" drivers should've taken over but oh well. I guess behind in front of the wheel isn't useful. Marketing is more important!

Bannedwith1milKarma 2025-06-23 23:36

This is a bet for an entire industry (default licensed self driving hardware/software). He'll run it at below the demand point where the Liberals won't be able to help it. It's also a springboard, most of these run at a loss in tradtional companies let alone the richest company with Leon and his Eye of Saucepan looking right at it.

TempleSquare 2025-06-24 00:31

Yep. I would've shorted it in 2019.

TempleSquare 2025-06-24 00:33

In Tesler's defense, a software update fixed *that* issue But in the end, the best glasses in the world (cameras) can't replace being deaf (no LiDAR)

SunnyWatchSD 2025-06-24 00:52

It already failed as a service but widely succeeded as a stock pump.

Demonshaker 2025-06-24 01:30

Indeed

Lopsided_Quarter_931 2025-06-24 01:31

There is no way they gonna stop it no matter what. It’s all about optics. They would geofence it down to a single street if they had to and still claim it’s a huge success. They put the driver on the passenger seat purely for optics. Makes no sense except for claiming that “nobody is on the driver’s seat”

demonicbullet 2025-06-24 01:39

Please do not try and educate people on the levels again. Genuinely this is really well defined and generally respected by the industry.

demonicbullet 2025-06-24 01:40

Dont forget it going into a left turn lane, suddenly swapping to the middle lane left turn signal still on (in a very jerky fashion) then driving into oncoming to get into the next actual left turn lane.... Yeah this definitely isnt going to hurt anyone.

demonicbullet 2025-06-24 01:42

Sell it all imo, id look to use profit on puts but many men have gone broke shorting Tesla so do that with caution

humanquester 2025-06-24 02:45

Here we are in america faffing around with fsd, in a country where people who can afford them have an unusual love for owning and driving their own cars and people who can't afford them also can't afford taxis, and in China they just keep building enormous amounts of high-speed railway that actually works. We are getting farther and farther behind with every passing day. Someday when all the money and smart people and exciting new things are in China I wonder if we'll will blame the people who wasted our time and resources on pointless bs, stupid wars and dumb ideas? Probably not.

lsthislegal 2025-06-24 03:18

Put your money where your mouth is!

jmouw88 2025-06-24 03:31

There hasn't been any period pretty much since its inception where tesla didn't deserve to be shorted. The stock is a loser all around, and yet has consistently won as investors seem perpetually willing to offer the company an endless runway on the next futuristic promise.

drcforbin 2025-06-24 04:54

When they crash (hopefully no injuries) it'll be declared a success no different from when his rockets blow up

Background_Topic2572 2025-06-24 11:00

Shorting it now reaps a 7. 72% dividend! Incredible. TSLQ. I Just loaded up.  TSLQ is down -4.20% to $15.22. Check it out on Yahoo Finance: https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/TSLQ

MayContainRawNuts 2025-06-24 13:18

Jesus, the fan boys are coping so hard they blame themselves for where the car parked.

crosstheroom 2025-06-24 13:55

Take all those $4.20 rides as far distance as you need tell Uber and Lyft people to do them also. Make Elon lose money and save yourself some. He has humans safety drivers and a follow up car so he's losing a lot of money, and all for nothing.

judge_mercer 2025-06-24 15:47

The problem is that Tesla might have stacked the odds so far in their favor, that they can likely make an utterly failed rollout look like a modest success. * I doubt Tesla will release data on how often remote/safety drivers intervene. * The safety driver in the passenger seat can grab the wheel to minimize the impact of many common problems, and not all of these will get caught on camera or reported on social media. * There are rumors that the on-board safety drivers will have brake switches as well, and a passenger won't be able to tell if they are braking or the FSD system. * If ridership remains invite-only, there could be lots of Tesla employees or fanboys. The embarrassing mistakes are (reportedly) starting to stack up, however. The same thing happened to Waymo and Cruise early on, of course, but Teslas repeating similar mistakes 3-4 years later isn't a good look.

Pancheel 2025-06-24 16:12

I mean the taxi sector of the business.

joejimjohn 2025-06-24 19:14

I've ridden in Waymos and experienced "full self driving". There is no comparison - Waymo's feel WAY safer than human taxi drivers which is why people will pay premium while FSD is your drunkish uncle. The tesla fanboys currently taking robotaxi are all Tesla owners with FSD used to the drunk uncle, but hard to see normies who have tried Waymo willing to continue to risk their lives in the robotaxi just to save 10 bucks once they give it a try.

IsThisOn11 2025-06-24 19:21

Need to also add that they were supervised robo taxis too.

General-Bend1129 2025-06-25 07:30

Of course tesla builds vapor ware

Diligent_Ad4694 2025-06-27 19:31

"my only regret.... Is i could not fan boi hard enough!.... <Death rattle>"

Organic_Ingenuity_ 2025-06-27 22:31

Lol this is the most detailed analysis I've ever seen

FI_321 2025-06-27 22:52

1. Disagree 2. Almost no one is real life cares that much about Elon to care.

MountainMark 2025-06-27 23:49

His declining car sales say differently. People are certainly making purchasing choices based on his political activities.

tangouniform2020 2025-06-29 08:14

You don’t live in Texas. The lege can write one law specifying the pencil thickness and another waving giant hand circles. Written by the same person.

legbreaker 2025-06-29 21:10

You are correct, they just say that it has to have multiple types of sensors for redundancy. They don’t specify which types exactly. Video + radar could count as multiple types under the law as I understand it.

big-papito 2025-06-30 11:22

No. You wait for bad news and the stock to go up. THEN you short it. Never short Tesla anticipating bad news - it doesn't work.

Add comment

Login is required to comment.

Login with Google