← Back to topic list

Tesla Is Sitting on an Enormous Pile of Unsold Cybertrucks

CautiousMagazine3591 | 2025-10-18 03:46 | 1008 views

Comments (131)
CautiousMagazine3591 2025-10-18 03:47

[https://www.theverge.com/news/798889/tesla-cybertruck-sales-decrease-q3-2025](https://www.theverge.com/news/798889/tesla-cybertruck-sales-decrease-q3-2025) Now compare that to sales, I am genuinely curious if Tesla sells about 5,000 cyber trucks per quarter why would they still be producing new cyber trucks if they have 10,000 in inventory. Wouldn't it make sense to just shut down production for 6+ months, and use the employees for something else?

Livinincrazytown 2025-10-18 03:53

I assume shutting down production line might negatively impact the meme stock

Feisty_Astronomer877 2025-10-18 03:54

Can use them to help reinforce the shore line...

SqueezyCheez85 2025-10-18 03:56

Wasn't there news recently that Tesla was selling Cybertrucks en masse to SpaceX?

[deleted] 2025-10-18 03:56

[deleted]

slick2hold 2025-10-18 03:56

The moment they shutdown production the stock take a huge hit. It running on vapors right now and if their is a sign of any crack it will collapse. Forget about Optimus or any other BS promises made by Elon. The market will not be as accommodating as it once was to Elon. Imo the amount of pumping still being done by analysts because they are probably getting massive fees for his equity raises in SpaceX and xAI and other businesses. This would be very interesting to check. Which analysts are pumping the stock and how much had Elon given to them in terms of fee business.

[deleted] 2025-10-18 03:57

If they shut down production for that long, the employees they can't find other work for will find other work themselves. In Elon's brain you don't want the employees you are left with because the one you want to keep can find other work. It might also be reality, but thats whats going through elon's brain. IMO they should have been working on the roadster, van, light weight pickup, semi, etc but elon serves one dish and its called "all the eggs in one basket"

[deleted] 2025-10-18 04:01

[deleted]

Gildardo1583 2025-10-18 04:02

Yeah, but how many can space x use?

Suikeran 2025-10-18 04:07

Golden rule of business: you need to sell things people want to buy.

BajaRooster 2025-10-18 04:13

Good employees don’t just hang around. Just look at his top staff leaving en masse.

Shafter111 2025-10-18 04:15

They will find you. Stay quiet my friend.

mishap1 2025-10-18 04:39

Just use them to line the sides of the launch pad to direct the bits of concrete away from spectators.

Scribble_Box 2025-10-18 04:40

Who says they have to use them lol.

Fit-Dentist6093 2025-10-18 04:41

They will sell them to X

dibsies 2025-10-18 04:46

\*Shocker\*

wisecommenter2 2025-10-18 04:51

This article alone caused Tesla's market cap to increase $200 billion.

blue-mooner 2025-10-18 04:53

Who will lease them back to Tesla as showroom and promo vehicles only.

Pineapplepizzaracoon 2025-10-18 05:00

They are an appreciating asset. Better to sit on them than sell lol

DeadMoneyDrew 2025-10-18 05:03

And your comment caused it to increase another $500 billion.

omgitsadad 2025-10-18 05:20

The only answer is going to have to be for a dramatic price reduction. If price of base truck comes down to 50k and awd to 55k, it is a competitive offering. Plus some minor mods to its design can really improve the use ability.  I know I’m on the minority. But after talking with a number of owners, who all seem to love it, I am looking forward to  see how deep the depreciation is on these guys and there is a sweet spot where I will buy one. But never for 70k.

cockcoldton 2025-10-18 05:41

To American taxpayers through spacex subsidies yes

Gildardo1583 2025-10-18 05:46

Very good point. They will end up abandoned in a lot like pics of those Chinese evs.

Gildardo1583 2025-10-18 05:47

HAHAAH, line the surface of the launch pad with them.

Hoover29 2025-10-18 05:55

It’d probably double.

Occhrome 2025-10-18 06:07

they are gonna hire some employees just to keep those turds charged.

dagelijksestijl 2025-10-18 06:09

Have fun driving a truck that can’t do truck stuff and which started falling apart even before rolling off the production line

Why_Cant_I_Slay_This 2025-10-18 06:11

This is fine X.ai will buy them and then Tesla will buy services from X.ai and both will show the revenue side and ignore the costs or whatever since reality doesn’t matter anymore

dynamadan 2025-10-18 06:15

And my axe caused it to go up another 200 billion.

tDominador 2025-10-18 06:33

I test drove one and loved it. Not sure how it can't do truck stuff. My impression was that it could more. You can control the ride height for highway driving or off roading. The bed cover is built in and retractable. It's crazy fast and the rides smooth as butter. Super quiet too. I want one. My wife want one. Just can't justify the price. If it drops we will probably buy one

Namerunaunyaroo 2025-10-18 06:42

Looks Like They Are Sitting On A Pile Of Capitals

ph4ge_ 2025-10-18 07:08

They are counting on a government to buy them.

rkcth 2025-10-18 07:18

Because its suspension is severely undersized, I read it has a car suspension for a truck, which is insane.

Electronic-Juice-359 2025-10-18 07:20

Sending them to the mars.

rogueredditthrowaway 2025-10-18 07:28

I hate the stock but there are a lot of “let’s reverse course on shooting ourselves in the foot” that’ll pump the stock which is why I’ll neither short or buy puts on it. If they canceled the cyber truck it’s going up 15% on the news

superteed 2025-10-18 07:39

Because nobody wants to buy those stupid things.

Lycyn 2025-10-18 07:46

If they increase production, it means cybertruck is doing well and stock will rise. If they decrease production, it means they will focus more on their more popular models and the stock will rise. If they change nothing, it must mean they already found the optimal strategy, the stock will rise.

WrongThinkBadSpeak 2025-10-18 07:48

The real Tesla product is the stock

Appropriate-Draft-91 2025-10-18 07:59

Shareholder disclosure rules. If they shut down production for lack of demand, and don't tell the shareholders, that would create legal issues. On the other hand Elon already had judges let him get away with worse. Also, getting ICE to buy them in bulk at inflated prices is a more appealing option.

onemightypersona 2025-10-18 08:03

They probably have agreements with material suppliers and figuring out how to store cars is easier than how to store materials.

Zedilt 2025-10-18 08:18

>Have fun driving a truck that can’t do truck stuff Most truck owners don't accually do truck stuff with their truck.

GoldenBunip 2025-10-18 08:59

The order was for just 500, to replace SpaceX ICE trucks.

ComicsEtAl 2025-10-18 09:29

I thought I read a bunch of them are now being sat on by SpaceX. Because not only are they the perfect vehicle for your daily and off-roading needs, but they are also certified for orbit. Not a lot of people know that.

Adventurous-Host8062 2025-10-18 09:54

Pretty sure painting them primary colors won't help. Ugh.

Sharkwatcher314 2025-10-18 10:58

Still surprised they didn’t buy them as cop cars or something to continue the grift and help him out

fatmanstan123 2025-10-18 11:08

They will eventually. Because yes, out makes no sense to hold massive amounts of inventory.

SolutionWarm6576 2025-10-18 11:20

XAi bought some too.

SolutionWarm6576 2025-10-18 11:22

Think they did shutdown the Y line and CT line, for a few weeks, back around end of June.

Euler007 2025-10-18 11:27

Maybe it plays funny with the books if you do that for amortization of the R&D and assembly line. Like lead to a massive loss on the books that they don't want in the middle of a pump. Not an accountant for a carmaker so I wouldn't know.

hashswag00 2025-10-18 11:27

They could lease them out to Waste Management

DistributedView 2025-10-18 11:31

Everything has a clearing price. They could theoretically sell every single one if they priced them below scrap value.

AcadiaLivid2582 2025-10-18 11:31

Too unreliable

AcadiaLivid2582 2025-10-18 11:33

The Ford Edsel was the biggest automotive flop of the 20th century, and it sold over 116,000 units. The Cybertruck has sold fewer than half as many.

PilotKnob 2025-10-18 12:00

It's ok, they're selling them to their sister company using taxpayer money.

Fockelot 2025-10-18 12:40

You mean a pile of trucks Tesla sold to itself and Elon bought so they could strip as much federal handouts as they could before they expired? That’s what really happened right?

Lacrewpandora 2025-10-18 12:52

If I know anything about Technoking, its that he'll force his own kids to reproduce just as much as he does. Soon his extended family will soon need thousands of apocalypse ready luxury chariots. Never doubt his 5D chess.

[deleted] 2025-10-18 12:54

TWO MILLION RESERVATIONS claimed 40.000 at most - was the reality of it. Elon is a liar, fraud, and clueless moron who doesn't know anything about cars or manufacturing.

[deleted] 2025-10-18 12:56

They "sold" 50k cars on storage JUST AS TAX CREDITS vanished The same fraud they already did in Canada

BringBackUsenet 2025-10-18 13:01

How many can they bill to NASA is the real question.

BringBackUsenet 2025-10-18 13:01

They'll go on the books as part of a NASA contract so the governmafia pays for them.

BringBackUsenet 2025-10-18 13:03

Since when has Wile Elon Coyote done anything that makes sense?

BringBackUsenet 2025-10-18 13:04

No. It might take a hit after the news but will soon be forgotten.

BringBackUsenet 2025-10-18 13:05

... at a price they are willing to pay.

BringBackUsenet 2025-10-18 13:06

No, the batteries would be an environmental disaster.

Ultraeasymoney 2025-10-18 13:06

Depends on how many launches are planned, and how many can fit in each launch.

BringBackUsenet 2025-10-18 13:08

Competitive for what? This "truck" barely has room for a couple six packs in the bed.

BringBackUsenet 2025-10-18 13:10

The grift will be that SpaceX will somehow put them on the books where NASA pays for them.

BringBackUsenet 2025-10-18 13:11

I don't think he knows anything about life in general.

finnishinsider 2025-10-18 13:33

Thank God Elon looked for waste, fraud and abuse....

External-Note-2719 2025-10-18 13:44

It doesn't matter, their not using them , he's manipulating the #s, just like the billion dollars he spent

External-Note-2719 2025-10-18 13:45

😂

Bancai 2025-10-18 13:46

They'll just send them to space so nobody can ever find em... But given the space x current progress, we'll find em at the bottom of the ocean.

[deleted] 2025-10-18 13:51

Shocking

analyticaljoe 2025-10-18 13:53

What we need is the "Tesla Vision Mobile Dumpster" business to stand up and voila!

Stock-Check 2025-10-18 13:55

Are you sure he wasn't looking for ways to waste, fraud and abuse the government?

trashpolice 2025-10-18 14:03

Could always use them as dumpsters

BringBackUsenet 2025-10-18 14:06

You're welcome.

BringBackUsenet 2025-10-18 14:06

He had to make room for the new generation of cronies by eliminating the old ones.

SVTContour 2025-10-18 14:11

ICE is gonna buy a bunch.

Red-eleven 2025-10-18 14:25

There is no fraud for maga supporters who pay their way

D74248 2025-10-18 14:28

The suspension is too weak to make it as a police car.

Whatwhyreally 2025-10-18 14:31

After musk sells as many as possible to himself for inflated values, they will kill off production and start discounting them. The model is dead. Whole thing is hilarious.

SimpleMindHatter 2025-10-18 14:54

There’s your data center power solution….OKLO, you don’t have to think too hard…🧐

Otherwise_Answer_146 2025-10-18 15:00

Unexpected Gimli!

iamdjdirty 2025-10-18 15:01

No way???!!!! How many previous buyer did not return them under the lemon law is beyond me.

dtyamada 2025-10-18 15:10

This article is from May so it can't account for that

ManyMuchMoosenen 2025-10-18 15:11

We’re keeping the money moving!

Roadgoddess 2025-10-18 15:34

Rent they also supposed to sell them to the US government as well?

Ashamed_Data430 2025-10-18 16:08

They'd be a lot more popular if they were branded Incel Caminos.

Gildardo1583 2025-10-18 16:14

I don't see how space x can use all those cars.

itshukokay 2025-10-18 16:15

Would make more sense if they used them as mobile service vehicles

Scribble_Box 2025-10-18 16:30

He'll probably just say they are to be eventually turned into mars rovers or something lmao... Then they'll rot away.

Dfiggsmeister 2025-10-18 16:35

Yep and he will continue to play the game of hot potato between his companies to hide the fact that nobody is buying them and inflating the sales figures. Eventually when they reach levels of depreciation where they’re worth more to scrap and recycle than it is to keep in warehouse and transport, he will scrap them. This is highly illegal, it’s akin to cooking the books to make a company look more profitable than it is and is considered to be fraud.

hk4213 2025-10-18 16:52

They won't get far so let them be branded with cyber trucks

ChollyWheels 2025-10-18 17:09

What I find weird - and a symptom of a kind of Tesla stubbornness -- is there no public plans for a Truck ver. 2. I actually like the creepy looks of the thing. Make it 2/3rds the size, replace steel with aluminum and the latest solid-state batteries... cut the price in half... So, okay, it needs to be radically re-thought. What's even stranger is there are SOME things the truck arguably did right -- steer-by-wire and 4 wheel steering and 48 volt architecture. Why are they not coming to Model Y or 3 or a promised Model 2? Tesla gets credit for the FIRST mass produced profitable EV and a pretty good one. Then it went nuts. Unfortunate.

torokunai 2025-10-18 17:10

I converted my day 1 reservation to $1000 off my 2023 MY AWD. It replaced a referral I also had but anyways.

area-dude 2025-10-18 17:12

You would be surprised when taxpayer money and corruption is involved! Millions!

Poker_3070 2025-10-18 17:14

Isn't the model Y the 2nd best selling EV in China this quater?

Poker_3070 2025-10-18 17:18

https://youtu.be/66CygO7IS4U?si=JQtX-ICW4dwaQw2F

D74248 2025-10-18 17:29

There is a big difference between a [unicorn](https://fortune.com/img-assets/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/lamborghini-huracacc81n-polizia_1.jpg?w=1280&q=90) and routine use in significant numbers.

EconomyDoctor3287 2025-10-18 17:35

The 500 cars SpaceX is buying are barely a drop in the bucket.

ComicsEtAl 2025-10-18 17:36

500… so far!

fucklawyers 2025-10-18 17:43

It ain’t just Chinese cars or EVs. Every manufacturer does this from time to time.

Poker_3070 2025-10-18 17:49

True, but I think they’ll use them daily since those were donated.

CauliflowerTop2464 2025-10-18 19:08

Imaging being someone that needed to get one as soon as they came out and paying $200k for a $100k car. Then you see this

vseventy 2025-10-18 19:26

The Edsel was considered a flop and it still sold 63,000 cars in its first year vs Ford’s goal of 100-200,000. The Cybertruck makes the Edsel look like a runaway success.

cashnicholas 2025-10-18 20:32

I’d pay 20k for one

BlixnStix7 2025-10-18 20:38

Sell them at a loss. They'll make money back on the monthly subscriptions to FSD Anyway.

Calm_Historian9729 2025-10-18 20:57

Time to recycle them into cutlery!

dboyr 2025-10-18 22:45

Well a few things here… 1) technically a contract is not a subsidy, 2) the company is currently majority funded through commercial revenue and private investment, and 3) spacex has saved the us tax payer $40B. So your statement is quite misleading and incorrect. Sources: https://pro.payloadspace.com/predicting-spacexs-2025-revenue/ https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/06/05/did-spacex-really-save-taxpayers-40-billion/

Nasarescue 2025-10-18 23:20

1500 to be exact. Problem is we/ they are having a hard time with charging stations on base. Otherwise I’m waiting for my or cyber truck work truck. So for all of you that already own a cyber truck I am sorry you are no longer unique. You basically have a government surplus vehicle. lol

lekoman 2025-10-19 00:25

Correction: “Tesla is STILL sitting on an enormous pile of unsold Cybertrucks.” This has been true for months and months, now. No one wants the damn things… they’re ugly, they’ve got terrible reliability scores, there are better vehicles from other manufacturers like Rivian and Ford in the category now, and… I’m sure there was one other thing I meant to say, but I can’t quite place it…

Lance_ReVanced 2025-10-19 00:43

Does the yellow rain taste funny?

dboyr 2025-10-19 00:44

Haha zing! Anything material to add?

Greenemcg 2025-10-19 01:20

Wankpanzer worse flop than the Edsel and more deadly than a ford pinto.

sadicarnot 2025-10-19 02:31

The article you linked about the $40 billio has this sentence: >Now, $40 billion is a big number, and it's not entirely clear how Hyten came up with it. The article does not refute or confirm that number. It is just a second hand quote from Bill Nelson about a conversation he had with the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. So we have no way of knowing if that $40 billion number is accurate from the article you linked. The article on SpaceX revenue is behind a paywall and is not available on the wayback machine. But one of the breakdowns I could find is this: >Payload's 2025 SpaceX revenue predictions: We estimate SpaceX will generate $18.2B in revenue in '25. Breakdown: \- Starlink: $12.8B \- Launch: $5.1B \- HLS: $300M \- Starlink customers: 8.4M Those numbers do not look sustainable. Starlink's revenue does not equal their cost. Add in Starlink has to replace all their satellites over the course of five years. I would say almost all of SpaceX's profit is coming from investors.

dboyr 2025-10-19 02:41

I agree a second hand quotation (albeit from a strong source) is not the most robust citation. I would concede that number likely has a 10% tolerance band, given the paradigm shift in cost and contract structuring that spacex has provided government launch. Here’s a better source re: general cost savings. Source: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/20200001093 To your assertion that revenue is stagnating and that “almost all of spacex’s profits are coming from investors”, capital investments are not included in revenue figures, and the published data shows a record of strong growth and profitability. Source: https://www.fool.com/investing/2025/02/08/how-much-money-did-spacex-make-in-2024/

ConkerPrime 2025-10-19 03:29

Everything about them is so bad that the POS could be given to me and I would pass as car insurance would not be worth it.

Nameless11911 2025-10-19 07:08

FAFO

ipub 2025-10-19 08:05

It's fortunate that musk has multiple avenues of contractual and potentially fraudulent abuse to recover this loss.

Chrysolophylax 2025-10-19 10:58

Go stand on a busy highway.

DamiensDelight 2025-10-19 11:59

Elon Musk is still a thieving little Nazi bitch boy. That is all. Full grift.

LancelLannister_AMA 2025-10-19 17:09

PRAISE EMPEROR MUSK

Emotional_Goal9525 2025-10-19 20:51

I guess they can melt them down for raw materials.

[deleted] 2025-10-20 04:50

Interesting stuff... but none of us know what profits spacex makes. The fool article says the profitability is estimated. But aren't they burning through cash reserves to develop their new rocket? That could explain why they are raising billions again. https://ai-stocks.com/2025/10/11/investors-back-spacex-in-latest-multi-billion-dollar-capital-raise/

nlaak 2025-10-20 13:42

> ICE is gonna buy a bunch. With as much as the right hates electric vehicles, that'll be fun to watch.

eugeniusbastard 2025-10-21 02:16

You can't just shut down production and simply restart it later. Employees can't be physically moved to other plants or retrained to other tasks easily without significant costs, existing machinery still needs constant maintenance, you'd have to close pipelines for specialized parts from vendor suppliers that may not be able to be resurrected at a later date, etc.

Dempsey64 2025-10-21 03:38

Make dune buggies!

Thinking-Crab-6358 2025-10-22 13:08

They look stupid

NacogdochesTom 2025-10-22 17:00

Your point seems to be that since (in one man's opinion) SpaceX has helped save the US taxpayer $40B then sweetheart deals to buy Musk's excess inventory are OK. Am I reading that right?

strategEV 2025-10-29 21:43

this explains a lot

Add comment

Login is required to comment.

Login with Google