← Back to topic list

Tire pressure experimentation

happyguy121 | 2026-03-05 16:39 | 18 views

Car tested: 2022 Model Y Long Range - 7 Seater. ContiPro RX 255/45R19 on 19x9.5 Gemini, all stock. This starts due to my curiosity on why german manufacturers in my experience always provide 'normal load' and 'full load' tire pressure. For example, GLE 450 in my case recommends 31 psi all around for 'normal load' (up to 4 person) and 38/44 front/rear for full load (another person + baggage). I suspect that 42 psi recommended by Tesla is rated for worst case 'full load', which in my case is 5712 lbs GVWR. What if under normal load (which 4500 lbs + 200 lbs driver weight in my case) is just at 4700 lbs, a full 1000 lbs less than 'full load'. So I'm trying to test in 42, 38, 34, and what I run with finally (36 psi). So I begin testing 'unscientifically' the comfort and driving dynamics. I wish I can run longer test to test out wear, but here goes my takeaways on different PSI. NOTE: This test is mostly just me driving alone. Your experience might and WILL differ if you carry passenger or heavier cargo. 42 psi: Ride is surprisingly decent and not as bad as forums communicate. It's tight and controlled over rough road and high speed with a slight 'skittish' feel, but you feel every single bumps. Steering is very light and easy if that's what you like, and highway curves felt 'nervous' to me at 70 - 80 mph. Car felt slightly jittery and produced unpleasant noise over slightly rough roads or worse. Very quiet on new road though. After 100 miles drive at mostly 70-80mph, and it went up to 44 psi at end of drive. I would reduce pressure a bit if it was my WRX back then since 2 psi jump towards end of long drive is usually sign of 'overinflation'. 38 psi: Ride is much better, felt as tight and controlled as 42 psi, but with a lot less bumps transmitted to the cabin. Somehow the distracting and unpleasant noise from 42 psi are all gone. Curves on 70 - 80 mph highways are more confident and inspiring rather than nervous on the 42 psi. Although comfort is a huge improvement from 42 psi, this would still be on the rough side for me (reminds me of my college days WRX). After 100 miles drive at mostly 70-80mph, tire pressure went to 42 psi (could be slightly less, but tpms only displayed whole number). So I felt good about this inflation. 34 psi: First of all, I'm surprised that TPMS are not triggered at this point. I was expecting ride to be comfortable, but this turned out wobbly and floaty. The bumps are well absorbed, but car felt slightly bouncy for a split second after each bump (and Philly roads are quite bumpy in general). This was unpleasant and felt wrong. Highway stability at 70 - 80 mph straights felt surprisingly good, but curves definitely rolled car into sidewall a bit and it didn't feel nice. Over 100 miles drive at mostly 70 - 80 mph, it went from 34 psi to 38 psi, so I don't think there are any heat issue (otherwise it would've went higher to 40 psi +). I wouldn't recommend 34 psi on long highway rides though, curves are not confident inspiring. 36 psi: This is the final favorite pressure. Tire absorbs minor bumps very well, and larger bumps are damped really nicely. No wobble like 34 psi, yet it absorbs the bump equally well IMO. Highway stability is amazing, and surprisingly curves at high speed felt very confident and 'grippy'. Over 100 miles drive at mostly 70 - 80 mph like above, it ends at 40 psi warm (again this is TPMS rounding to nearest whole number). This becomes my favorite instantly, especially since TPMS is not triggered. TLDR; if you are familiar and understand the risk (and return) of tire dynamics, feel free to experiment. It's amazing how much vehicle dynamic changes with different tire pressure.

Comments (20)
ajn63 2026-03-05 17:01

Good info. Thanks for sharing. I’m going to try 36psi. Though I found out if tire pressure drops to level that triggers low pressure alert, (cold mornings) the cars summon feature will fail mid-action.

RespondHot3969 2026-03-05 17:18

Here I am rocking 45 PSI… not bad tbh, rides stiff but I guess I’m used to it at this point in time.

happyguy121 2026-03-05 17:19

For sure! Hoping to hear your thoughts on 36 psi. Tesla's TPMS are quite unpredictable. I remembered 38 psi always triggered it for me years ago, but recently even 33 psi didn't trigger warning. What gives me comfort for 36 psi is also the weight capacity total of 7,064 lbs vs my actual 4700 lbs load. That is a massive 50% margin at 36 psi. Traditionally luxury manufacturer sits closer to 15-20% margin which is closer to 28 psi on my 104XL tire (think GLE, S-Class, BMW 7 series, etc.). Even 30 psi still have massive margin if you're driving alone (but the discomfort and floatyness is likely unbearable for Model Y unless you drive very slow).

happyguy121 2026-03-05 17:23

Great to hear! Can echo that 45 psi felt amazing, on smoother roads. Responsive, good feedback, and sports car feeling. Bonus points on range too. Enjoy!

YouKidsGetOffMyYard 2026-03-05 17:43

I always thought Tesla recommended 42 to get maximum range. I run 18" wheels on my Y and I use 36 psi "cold" pressure and it for sure gives a better ride than 42 PSI. I am not very concerned about range.

happyguy121 2026-03-05 17:56

Great to hear I'm not alone! Although yours is even better with taller sidewall. What tire do you run?

YouKidsGetOffMyYard 2026-03-05 19:02

BF Goodrich All Season 245/50R18

captaingreyboosh 2026-03-06 01:33

Id think you’re damaging your motor long term by increasing the resistance, are you seeing your range affected?

JonCohen3D 2026-03-06 07:53

Thanks for the most interesting post on this subreddit in recent memory. It would be great to hear about the efficiency impact of the various pressures (if it is significant).

happyguy121 2026-03-06 09:50

Efficiency hasn’t been big on my list, but I don’t notice any meaningful difference on efficiency screen, given that at 70-80 mph it’s almost exclusively wind resistance. Would be interesting to test at lower speed where rolling resistance dominates.

RitzyIsHere 2026-03-06 13:12

Im running 33 on conti 275 45 19. No problem. Just did a 400km trip range was normal but thats average 40kph to 50kph lol.

happyguy121 2026-03-06 13:51

Appreciate the data point! That’s a smart move with 108XL load. I’m sure comfort is great! Anything you notice with 33 around? Also testing 32/35 setup currently and honestly even better than 36 psi squared above.

RitzyIsHere 2026-03-06 14:15

Definitely lower range than the stock 255 45 19. But tire pressure didn't make a significant effect on the range. Comfort is there. Definitely gained more sidewall than expected. Stock 255 is stretched on our 19x9.5 so having 275 on the 9.5 gave it less stretch giving more gain on sidewall height. Idk if i explained it right. For 33psi its just softer. Cornering is still good on daily driving. Potholes are less felt. Road debris and imperfections are less noticeable.

happyguy121 2026-03-06 14:22

Debating between that and 255/50r19. Definitely with you on 255 being slightly stretched. Thanks again for the feedback on 275

silentbutdead1y 2026-03-06 14:47

If you live in a cold weather area, March is a time when large potholes can appear quickly. You might want to stick with 42 psi during this time until the ground thaws and potholes get patched.

Always_working_hardd 2026-03-06 18:11

There's a youtuber in California that recommends 45psi. I've been running that for a few weeks and note that the pressure runs up to 47 generally and sometimes 49. No problems noted. I mostly drive 450 mile commutes loaded with stuff; probably around an extra 300 lbs or so. I did it for better efficiency hoping to keep it around 250Whm, but get over 275Whm. I have noticed clunking in the front end at slow speeds and uneven / bumpy surfaces. I'm sure deflating will eliminate (or cover up) the clunking. I appreciate you making this post as it is interesting to me and while I wouldn't do the testing you did, you've satisfied my curiosity. I am going to deflate my tires back to 42 for my next commute on Sunday, and may even drop down to 38 on the next commute. How is your efficiency at the tested pressures? Was that something you monitored? With respect to TPMS sensors, it's always been my understanding that they would trigger when one or more tires were 10% or so less than the others. I think that's why you are not getting alerts at 'low' pressures. I don't know what the TPMS would do if you got 4 blowouts simultaneously - all to zero and no percentage differential. Edit: I see you answered efficiency questions later in the threddit.

happyguy121 2026-03-06 18:54

the clunking honestly sounds like suspension problem. If its under warranty (or even not), it might be a good idea to bring it for a service before suspension potentially falls apart. Just got mine replaced last week.

Always_working_hardd 2026-03-06 20:45

Yes mine's a 2026; I see a lot of posts about the same issue with no resolution. For now, I'm waiting for someone to post how Tesla did a fix.

Ooogen 2026-03-06 23:38

38 psi is the sweet spot for me! I did the same experimenting but my TPMS triggers below 36… 255-55R18 Falken Wildpeak AT Trail

happyguy121 2026-03-06 23:51

Honestly at this point I ignore tpms. I am comfortable with using load index chart provided by ETRTO and even 32 psi for front is generous on stock 255/45r19.

Add comment

Login is required to comment.

Login with Google