← Back to topic list

Tesla is facing an investigation over Full Self-Driving traffic violations | The NHTSA is reviewing incidents where FSD-enabled Teslas blew through red lights or traveled the wrong

theverge | 2025-10-09 13:31 | 329 views

Comments (48)
theverge 2025-10-09 13:32

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has opened an investigation into more than 2.8 million Tesla vehicles with the company’s Full Self-Driving (FSD) system. As reported earlier by Reuters, the investigation will probe the traffic violations that occur with FSD, including driving through red lights and traveling the wrong way down the street. NHTSA’s Office of Defects Investigation is looking into 58 traffic safety incidents involving FSD, including 14 crashes and 23 injuries. In some cases, a Tesla vehicle failed to stop, or didn’t remain stopped, at a red light with FSD engaged, while others involve Teslas with FSD entering the opposite lane of traffic during or following a turn, or attempting to “turn onto a road in the wrong direction despite the presence of wrongway road signs.” Read more: [https://www.theverge.com/news/797618/tesla-nhtsa-investigation-full-self-driving-traffic-safety-violations](https://www.theverge.com/news/797618/tesla-nhtsa-investigation-full-self-driving-traffic-safety-violations)

Engunnear 2025-10-09 13:38

"It drives better than I do!"

Bagafeet 2025-10-09 13:52

They're not wrong tbh, cause they tend to be trash drivers anyway.

RiseUpAndGetOut 2025-10-09 13:57

I look forward to this investigation taking several years to complete, with no decisive outcome.

improvthismoment 2025-10-09 14:12

Relative of mine, after a few weeks with her (at the time new, 2024) Model Y: "I used to think Tesla drivers were assholes. Now I know that they were using FSD. FSD drives like an asshole. I never use it anymore."

rbirming3 2025-10-09 14:22

This would be a real problem for robotaxis and unsupervised FSD. Best to follow the guidelines and stay attentive in case FSD gets lost.

SolutionWarm6576 2025-10-09 14:23

“Almost sentient”.

SolutionWarm6576 2025-10-09 14:27

It’s funny. The new head of the NHSTA Trump appointed in July, has supposedly clashed with Leon and Tesla before regarding safety. This might be interesting. lol.

maclaren4l 2025-10-09 14:27

Nissan Altima drivers have left the chat… enter Model Y drivers! 😂😂😂😂

jcrazy78 2025-10-09 14:42

How has NHTSA not already done something about this? It's been like this for years with no government intervention nor penalties of note.

Engunnear 2025-10-09 14:42

Sure. And how about if Tesla actually implements robust driver monitoring, and stops promoting FSD as an actual autonomy product?

rbirming3 2025-10-09 14:43

Too many " what is".

Engunnear 2025-10-09 14:53

Because the NHTSA has no enforcement authority.

GinnedUp 2025-10-09 14:56

So what's new? It is not Full Self anything! It is lousy software with my human eyes better than my '19 model 3 cameras that get blinded with sun, rain and snow. Tesla should refund my purchase, for non delivery, plus $$$ for fraud.

levon999 2025-10-09 14:57

What is a NHTSA safety recall?

Which-Way-212 2025-10-09 14:59

I always read that NHTSA starts some investigation on this or that concerning Tesla. After they start their investigation there is never heard anything about an outcome. They are like ongoing forever... What the fuck is that shit? Just watch the videos, enforce Tesla to report disengagement rates, see they are way to low, forbid their software to operate until they met threshold X miles to disengagements. Where X is a number that ensures self driving cars are safer than human driven cars. How complicated can this be ffs?!

levon999 2025-10-09 15:00

Are state agencies going to approve unsupervised while there is an ongoing federal safety investigation?

Engunnear 2025-10-09 15:02

NHTSA is just the communicator in that situation. If there's any enforcement against an OEM necessary, it's going to come from the FTC or some other agency.

levon999 2025-10-09 15:06

“The Vehicle Safety Act provides for civil penalties for certain violations and authorizes NHTSA to enter into settlements on penalties.” https://www.nhtsa.gov/laws-regulations/civil-penalty-settlements

dtyamada 2025-10-09 15:08

Oh they probably drive like ass holes as well. Since that's what FSD uses for training data.

Engunnear 2025-10-09 15:26

Right. That says that NHTSA has the authority to sue a manufacturer, not to take direct enforcement action against them.

GhostofBreadDragons 2025-10-09 15:28

Well I know which agency is getting cut next.

mikefjr1300 2025-10-09 15:29

FSD drives barely a notch above the AI in my racing sim games.

GhostofBreadDragons 2025-10-09 15:29

“It’s just puffery” - Tesla lawyer

[deleted] 2025-10-09 15:30

How complicated? How about very. Without FSD Supervised, there will never be unsupervised. Y'all probably sound like the horse and buggy manufacturers when autos were becoming popular. Lead, follow, or get the hell out of the way.

mishap1 2025-10-09 15:53

He's just waiting for a certain bitcoin transfer to hit his wallet.

mishap1 2025-10-09 15:57

They'll claim it's different software and Robotaxi is far more advanced.

theviolatr 2025-10-09 15:57

So basically the nearly one trillion in value assigned to Robotaxi could vanish overnight if the NHTSA ruling is "harsh" (aka common sense). Stock flat on this news. Sigh

improvthismoment 2025-10-09 16:01

How about they just drop the Full and Self from the term Full Self Driving? That would be more honesty in advertising at least?

beren12 2025-10-09 16:12

Ask her where she thinks the car learned it from?

88888_account 2025-10-09 16:52

Bullish !

Lacrewpandora 2025-10-09 17:02

I assure you: FSD will never "work" in the sense that it will offer SAE Level 5 autonomous driving. I could just as easily say "people who don't believe in unicorns are just like horse and buggy manufacturers". Its an absolutely meaningless comparison until FSD "works"...which circles us back around to: It will neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeever work. The janky Temu cameras can't even see far enough to safely enter traffic - ergo Chuck can never complete his sisyphean left turn. I have a proposal for all Branch Elonians: How About TSLA makes a product that actually works...and this is the disruptive part: ***BEFORE*** selling it to the public. We'd all be better off.

derverdwerb 2025-10-09 18:07

I hope she had a free trial.

improvthismoment 2025-10-09 18:24

Depends on what the meaning of is, is

improvthismoment 2025-10-09 18:27

I'd be OK with just truth in advertising. FSD does not have full or self in the driving. Supervised FSD is an oxymoron. They just need a different, more accurate, name. And, more honest and realistic promises about the future. Then, I'd have no problem.

TormentedOne 2025-10-09 19:57

Yeah it's stupid anyway I mean the software is a moving target. They need a regulatory body that can respond almost instantly in order to keep up.

Engunnear 2025-10-09 21:35

Well, if there ever is an effective regulatory framework put in place, I guarantee that robust change control will be a part of it. That’ll slow Tesla’s roll.

BringBackUsenet 2025-10-09 21:38

What took them so long?

BringBackUsenet 2025-10-09 21:40

Too bad we can't get Ralph Nader to write a book.

ObservationalHumor 2025-10-09 22:49

It'll go away quicker than that. All it'll take is an investment in one of some of Trump's meme coin or one of his son's companies and magically it'll disappear.

OrdinaryPollution339 2025-10-10 03:02

The US hasn't had a working regulatory environment for decades at this point. The Big Three are mostly complying due to inertia and market demand. Tesla is the first US carmaker to blatantly ignore rules and regulations, but other corporations/ industries have been doing it for ages.

RocketLabBeatsSpaceX 2025-10-10 04:33

One of many ongoing investigations. I hope they nail them to the wall for the egregious way they’ve allowed Tesla to endanger others and cost innocent people their lives. Rather than put a stop to it, Tesla prefers to continue selling pipe dreams of cars that can drive for you. Glorified cruise control is what it is.

RocketLabBeatsSpaceX 2025-10-10 04:34

That’s what the Tesla collision sub reminds me of. I gave a guy shot for his car wrecking itself and was banned. Lmao

RocketLabBeatsSpaceX 2025-10-10 04:36

Elon will start a department to remove all this pesky “bureaucracy that’s stifling innovation” or some non sense. Safety be damned. Elons willing and able to write the rules with the blood of others. It’s a sacrifice he’s willing to make.

RocketLabBeatsSpaceX 2025-10-10 04:40

I hate to break your bubble, but unless Elon makes a 180 and suddenly embraces multi-sensor suites and LIDAR, it’s never happening. Sorry you were fleeced out of 8k.

RocketLabBeatsSpaceX 2025-10-10 04:41

I’d be ok with “glorified cruise control.”

Which-Way-212 2025-10-10 06:04

You don't understand my point? I meant how complicated can it be to accelerate this investigation of NHTSA. That unsupervised fsd is super complicated is not to question. It is proof enough that Tesla is not even able to deploy robotaxis without safety monitors in small scale and geofenced areas.

DistributedView 2025-10-11 07:17

No government body wants to be responsible for the collapse of Tesla's share price. When JP Morgan and the BoE are publicly warning about a US stock market crash based on the AI bubble bursting, I can't help but think really talking about TSLA and the impact it would have on the S&P,.

Add comment

Login is required to comment.

Login with Google