← Back to topic list

Tesla robotaxi slams on brakes hard — catches influencer riding by surprise, who says “it braked for no reason,” but was it due to mild sun glare, which is kryptonite for Tesla’s l

xpxf69 | 2025-06-24 21:33 | 634 views

Comments (99)
transsolar 2025-06-24 21:36

FSD works best in sunlight\* \*do not use in sunlight

RN_Geo 2025-06-24 21:40

How long until this project gets the plug pulled because fElon has concerns over "safety?"

RN_Geo 2025-06-24 21:42

They could do a 2 for 1 and kill off the cyberturd too.

origplaygreen 2025-06-24 21:44

“This is why it’s in beta” Then get it off the roads the rest of are on.

DareDareCaro 2025-06-24 21:46

Imagine having the job of the loser suppose to check the monster from the passenger seat.

FlyMyPig 2025-06-24 21:51

Until the body count start piling up, unfortunately

Imper1um 2025-06-24 21:52

Ahh yes, the bane of FSD: sun glare Ahh yes, the bane of FSD: a light fog Ahh yes, the bane of FSD: night time Ahh yes, the bane of FSD: snow Ahh yes, the bane of FSD: weird construction markers Ahh yes, the bane of FSD: not highways

MrHumph999 2025-06-24 21:52

I am forbidden to comment in here as the other Tesla subs ban me. I wish I could comment as I have owned three Teslas since 2017. Gestapo (shit) I'm in trouble 😵‍💫😵‍💫😵‍💫

[deleted] 2025-06-24 21:59

Interesting, I see this comment.

CompetitiveGood2601 2025-06-24 22:06

i was more worried about the - fail to turn, drive in wrong lane video eventually move to right lane and try again

babypho 2025-06-24 22:11

He is now banned from the other tesla subs.

OrganizeAndResist 2025-06-24 22:11

You forgot the high beams of the car in the opposite lane. And The low beams of the car in the opposite lane.

ShotNixon 2025-06-24 22:16

Tesla products have more, stipulations, conditions, label warnings than Happy Fun Ball

DonAmecho777 2025-06-24 22:17

Elon gonna die on that LiDAR hill

ckl_88 2025-06-24 22:23

Just wait until the weather is less than ideal... I've said it once, and I'll say it a thousand times... FSD cannot be achieved with cameras alone. Might work in perfect weather, but when you have rain, fog, snow, or any combination of bad weather, robotaxi will start getting into serious fatal accidents.

porkrind 2025-06-24 22:23

you forgot "also the car with its lights off"

boofles1 2025-06-24 22:24

No way does Elon care about other people's safety.

lump77777 2025-06-24 22:26

It will be other people who die.

bobi2393 2025-06-24 22:32

Specifically, [Tesla says](https://www.tesla.com/ownersmanual/2020_2024_modely/en_cn/GUID-E5FF5E84-6AAC-43E6-B7ED-EC1E9AEB17B7.html): ⚠**WARNING** Traffic-Aware Cruise Control is particularly unlikely to operate as intended in the following types of situations: * The road has sharp curves or significant changes in elevation. * Road signs and signals are unclear, ambiguous, or poorly maintained. * Visibility is poor (due to heavy rain, snow, hail, etc. or **poorly lit roadways at night**) * You are driving in a tunnel or next to a highway divider that interferes with the view of the camera(s) * Bright light (such as from oncoming headlights or **direct sunlight**) interferes with the view of the camera(s).

DonAmecho777 2025-06-24 22:46

They’ll stack em deep

sidc42 2025-06-24 22:51

Please, Elon doesn't care about the safety of peasants. It'll get pulled when something happens that causes the stock to go into decline for more than three days in a row or until he concocts an even better scheme to pump the stock and doesn't need the show.

sidc42 2025-06-24 22:53

DO NOT TAUNT HAPPY FUN TESLER!!!

SpectrumWoes 2025-06-24 22:54

They simply forgot to turn on the setting for direct photon counting when seeing glare. Edge case. Will be fixed in 2 weeks

Mean-Evidence-4056 2025-06-24 22:57

Its a good thing apparently you can't get one when it's raining, i do wonder what happens if you are riding on one and it starts raining like crazy, i guess they won't be in south Florida for a while

greggobbard 2025-06-24 23:01

Add: roads

mt8675309 2025-06-24 23:03

Tesla is seeing the end of the road.

Amazonreviewscool67 2025-06-24 23:08

Anyone else thinking of getting into Waymo IPO?

ExcitingMeet2443 2025-06-24 23:14

>Tesla is seeing (what it *thinks* is) the end of the road and jamming on the brakes.

ExcitingMeet2443 2025-06-24 23:18

Will someone think of the school busses and kids who deliberately try to make Tesler look ~bad~~ even worse.

Belgarablue 2025-06-24 23:18

Pay me $50,000, and give me a Tesla. I'll take the cash, and scrap the car, undriven.

Radarhog1976 2025-06-24 23:24

Sorry fanbois but how could NHTSA ever authorize Level 4 or 5 for something so dangerous on our highways? Every American will be at risk, not just the people buying or renting out their Teslas. Waymo has 3 different sensors maintaining safety and Tesla has 1 (ONE)! FSD should be not licensed ever.

Radarhog1976 2025-06-24 23:25

Or North Florida or any of the other 49 States!

Sartres_Roommate 2025-06-24 23:28

Tesla will ultimately go bankrupt. The question is will it be from his Nazi sympathizing OR his inability to admit he was DEAD wrong about needing lidar for FSD?

DeepGamingAI 2025-06-24 23:33

Thats a sacrifice he is willing to make, what a kind hearted guy!

michelevit2 2025-06-24 23:34

I have a bad feeling that Tesla is going to seriously injure someone or worse and screw up self-driving cars for everyone.

Acrobatic_Code_7409 2025-06-24 23:39

They need to take better care of our Influencers!!! Not a scratch on his/her beautiful face Muskerz!

StuckInTheUpsideDown 2025-06-24 23:43

I can't think of anything more dangerous than abruptly transferring control to the driver in a narrow tunnel.

move_machine 2025-06-24 23:44

Line must go up

whisperwrongwords 2025-06-24 23:44

Imagine risking your life going on one of these for your social media content farm

apachevoyeur 2025-06-25 00:10

*do not taunt Happy Fun Ball

apachevoyeur 2025-06-25 00:14

yep, i'm wfh and ordering groceries on favor until the threat is neutralized

[deleted] 2025-06-25 00:19

[deleted]

Crutchduck 2025-06-25 00:20

September. Theres a law coming into effect in TX that says all self driving need to be level 4 certified. So that'll kill it then he'll blame the state for slowing his progress.

luv2block 2025-06-25 00:31

So basically no robotaxis will be allowed to pick up people from the hospital. Imagine having recent surgery, you get released, then the car throws you around like a rag doll for no reason. Your stitches all get ripped open and you call the Tesler guy for help and he says "Umm, I'll have the car pull over and let you out. Thank you for choosing Tesler robotaxis."

[deleted] 2025-06-25 00:31

There's a whole lot going wrong in Elon's orbit, yet Telsa stock keeps recovering. I'm just watching from the sidelines... at a safe distance from the "FSD" Teslas.

jcdomeni 2025-06-25 00:46

This morning - while 85F outside. Our M3P couldn’t see due to mild condensation on windshield. Does same thing most mornings for first couple miles.

Narrackian_Wizard 2025-06-25 00:48

So in university we had a course where we had to program a battery powered remote control toy car to drive itself. Granted, it just needed to avoid obstacles and drive down a magnetic strip but it took DAYS to program (actually most of the class was on hardware not software…) We used lidar. We didn’t have any issues. They have had YEARS. Now I know that there is a huge gap between a tesla and a remote toy car, but people were able to program the entire thing in just a few class periods on simple cheap technology.

iJeff 2025-06-25 00:56

Some people do report sun-related issues with FSD, but it's worth noting that Traffic-Aware Cruise Control is a completely separate system. It runs on an older software stack that hasn't seen updates in ages and also doesn't function in conditions where FSD does, like heavy rain or snow. IMO they shouldn't be locking safety improvements behind an FSD paywall.

Nydus87 2025-06-25 01:02

“It’s bug testing!”  On public roads?! Stop pushing Dev branches to Prod environments, for fuck sake!

friendIdiglove 2025-06-25 01:13

School buses, children, pedestrians not in a crosswalk, and pedestrians in a crosswalk.

Clint888 2025-06-25 01:17

…and the opposite lane itself

friendIdiglove 2025-06-25 01:18

It’s been three hours. I hope he turns up alive and well.

bobi2393 2025-06-25 01:43

Different software, but this video suggests that the latest hardware and best software has the same difficulty estimating whether there's no obstacle in front of the car in certain direct sunlight conditions.

Distinct_Plankton_82 2025-06-25 01:47

Of course that’s what it is.

chat-lu 2025-06-25 02:12

Do not get wet, do not charge after midnight. No wait, it’s the cybertruck that can’t get wet.

ITgreybeard 2025-06-25 02:12

Well said, in the eyes of an I.T. Greybeard.

ITgreybeard 2025-06-25 02:13

Just field a right hand drive car, and it will appear to be self-driving.

Ok-Broccoli-8432 2025-06-25 02:27

His defense of it is laughable and a total contradiction, paraphrasing: "we use a super advanced neural network instead" "there's no way to handle conflicting data between camera and lidar" Bro, what good is a neural network that doesn't thrive on more data from better sensors, lmao. Just admit you wanted higher margins.

Livinincrazytown 2025-06-25 03:42

Add a vehicle parallel parking in front of it

Livinincrazytown 2025-06-25 03:43

Americans are dumb enough for that to work haha

blargh9001 2025-06-25 04:03

They’ll keep hyping it until they can quietly ramp it down to a human-driven uber-like service, and continue saying that it will be ready for FSD any day now for another decade. They’ll time it to transitioning the hype to a limited ‘release’ of remote-operated Optimus prime, available only to shareholding influencers.

EnglishMobster 2025-06-25 04:25

When Tesla gave me the FSD beta, I literally could not use it on my drive home because the sun would blind the front camera for the entire drive. It defeated the entire purpose of having FSD. Needless to say, I did not buy FSD when the trial expired.

EnglishMobster 2025-06-25 04:27

Being banned from the other Tesla subs is a badge of honor, TBH

mtnbike2 2025-06-25 05:08

Risking the life of every driver in Austin who didn’t sign up to participate in the beta test too.

iJeff 2025-06-25 05:10

It's a real experience, but I haven't run into it just yet. Might be due to the HW4 cameras and not yet having the common windshield haze issue? However, I was just pointing out that the particular language cited refers to a different feature.

babycynic 2025-06-25 05:23

I sure as hell wouldn't be hopping in one of those without a seatbelt on. Well I wouldn't even with one. But it still amazes me to see someone not wearing one in this day and age, I'd think the safety data on those is pretty damn conclusive.

iftlatlw 2025-06-25 05:37

It's extraordinary that Tesla stock hasn't collapsed yet, given the failure of fsd, taxi and sales.

DamnUOnions 2025-06-25 05:56

I have 2 BEVs and I am banned from all Tesla subs AND the electricvehicle sub. lol

DamnUOnions 2025-06-25 05:57

Remove your windshield. Simple fix :-)

DamnUOnions 2025-06-25 06:00

Too many big players have too much money invested there. It's a meme coin for several years at this point.

Matazj 2025-06-25 06:10

> Now I know that there is a huge gap between a tesla and a remote toy car, but people were able to program the entire thing in just a few class periods on simple cheap technology. The problem Tesla is having is that they insisted on doing it the cheapest way with vision only and machine learning. So the gap isn't a gap in scale/complexity, they literally don't program it. Which means they can't really fix problems and edge cases like this. The best they can do is retrain and adjust weights and hope it solves this particular problem, but it might create new problems somewhere else.

KnucklesMcGee 2025-06-25 06:37

That's the neat part. Elon doesn't care about safety.

CloudSlydr 2025-06-25 07:55

Horrible gamble on vis only that doesn’t even make logical sense to non-engineers. Years and years of potential lead absolutely squandered.

jailtheorange1 2025-06-25 08:15

It doesn’t sound like it really works anywhere any time?

atpplk 2025-06-25 09:11

While his net worth grows billions daily. That's a sacrifice he is willing to make.

bobi2393 2025-06-25 09:13

It works fine anytime it's not day or night! 😂 Seriously though, I think the sunlight issue is mainly when the sun is at a low angle just above the horizon, in front of the vehicle, or bright headlights are pointing right at the cameras at night. Humans have the same basic problem with our eyes in both conditions. It's a situation that raises the well-worn debate over whether lidar or some other type of sensor should be used for redundancy with the camera. Tesla has made strides in improving image processing facing direct sunlight, but if sunlight caused the OP problem, the system doesn't seem sufficiently safe and reliable in environments where other drivers might not brake fast enough to avoid hitting phantom-braking Teslas. Maybe it would be adequate in an environment with all driverless cars, or in a country where drivers tend to allow greater space for braking, but not in the US where humans are still allowed to drive.

cybercrumbs 2025-06-25 10:00

I can't see Tesla ever getting it to work safely. Not only is Tesla's hardware inadequate, but they don't have the software talent. Which has been exiting in droves and was dubious even to begin with.

bpaul83 2025-06-25 10:05

You’d think random bard braking would make her re-evaluate her decision to not wear a seatbelt…

entropy512 2025-06-25 11:03

That's why Autopilot and FSD are still level 2 that require constant supervision/hands on the wheel. My EV6's "hands on wheel" monitor is annoying - it operates by detecting torque, so if you agree with what the car is doing and have your hands on the wheel but not applying any correctional torque, it bitches at you to keep your hands on the wheel. It even bitches when ADAS isn't enabled and you're driving straight...

[deleted] 2025-06-25 12:12

I use fsd daily and it's far from being ready for "robotaxis". There are many weaknesses in the system. Rain, snow, sunshine, dark roads can cause it to work improperly or not at all. I'd never get into one of these.

phate_exe 2025-06-25 12:53

>You forgot the high beams of the car in the opposite lane. >And >The low beams of the car in the opposite lane. Clearly the obnoxiously bright LED headlights Honda is using nowadays are just a part of a plot by legacy automakers to prevent Tesla from bringing us into the future.

Narrackian_Wizard 2025-06-25 14:10

Wow thanks for the insight! I always wondered why it was taking them so long. Is tesla the only one that does it loke this?

danrokk 2025-06-25 15:41

Just count photons dude.

Pepparkakan 2025-06-25 16:47

Works fine during daytime on straight roads when it’s slightly overcast, just make sure you don’t need to go anywhere in any other situation, duh!

[deleted] 2025-06-25 16:56

Y

lithiumdeuteride 2025-06-25 19:52

Ah, but you forget that radar can bounce off the Sun (with a trip time of over 16 minutes). That's why camera-only navigation is the future! ^^^/s

Thecuriousprimate 2025-06-26 01:14

One of the many reasons to equip self driving vehicles with lidar, which Tesla used to do, but, found it too costly. Tesla was caught having the FSD disengage before impact and claiming driver error. Who do they blame with robo taxi? “The passenger chose a route which had sun glare which they agreed in the terms and conditions would make them liable for any and all damage the robo taxi causes.”

Dmoan 2025-06-26 11:43

And if it crashes when that happens it is technically drivers fault..

Ouch259 2025-06-26 12:13

That is going to be an interesting court case in the future. Usually if you hit someone in the back its your fault for following to close or not paying attention. If the robotaxi has a documented flaw of slamming on the brakes for no reason I can see it being the Robotaxis fault.

Radical_Neutral_76 2025-06-28 09:08

Well they already have tons of americans on the road it might not be such a huge difference

Radical_Neutral_76 2025-06-28 09:09

Is that OTA?

BrainOnLoan 2025-06-28 13:19

They'll just stick with keeping human intervention in the loop all the time. So fake robo taxis.

UpbeatSkeptic 2025-06-30 12:40

It also doesn’t work in fog, rain, snow and just about any other sub-optimal conditions. That’s why it was so incredibly stupid of Elon to get rid of the ultra-sonic sensors and rely on ordinary video cameras. As soon as he announced that a few years ago I knew their autonomous project would never get off the ground. This is one of four fatal mistakes Elon had made that have doomed Tesla: the others are not building a sub $30k car, getting in bed with Nazis, and not updating the vehicles’ design language since 2012. All Teslas (except the Cyberdumpster) look like used Mazdas from 2014. They are SO dated compared to the competition. He’s basically given up on the car business and has bet the entire company on autonomy, which he made sure will never succeed because of his idiotic camera-only decision. It baffles me how investors can’t see these huge missteps, and don’t realize that Tesla is basically a dead company, somehow still limping along, but not for much longer. Even if he suddenly reversed all these terrible mistakes, it’s too late. My prediction is that Tesla stock will be under $100 within 18 months, and they will file bankruptcy within 5 years. Firing Elon might prolong things, but nothing will save this sinking ship. Good riddance.

UpbeatSkeptic 2025-06-30 12:51

He was probably in a coke induced mania when he decided to get rid of all sensors besides plain old video cameras, and now he’s too stubborn (stupid) to admit he was very, very WRONG. Of course anyone with a brain knew he was wrong the day he announced his vision only fantasy.

UpbeatSkeptic 2025-06-30 12:59

Exactly! Regular Ubers only need one human operator. Tesla Cybercabs need one in the passenger seat, and a big team of engineers remotely monitoring and intervening - so Elon’s version of autonomous driving has MORE humans involved in operating the vehicles than ever before! How can investors and financial analysts be so fooled by this clown? They soon will see the truth, however, because this joke of a “launch” is good for one thing: exposing how inferior Tesla’s technology is. The stock will be under $100 in 18 months or less.

UpbeatSkeptic 2025-06-30 13:11

I don’t know about 3 days in a row, but the stock is down 34% from its high just 6 months ago… and it’s about to go a LOT lower. Q2 delivery figures on Wednesday will be even more dismal than the worst predictions, this joke of a robo-taxi “launch” (stunt) will continue to reveal how pitiful their self-driving tech is and they will be forced to cancel it, and they are soon to lose billions in government subsidies thanks to the right wing morons (especially Trump) that Elon spent hundreds of millions to install in office. Whatever talent he may have had at business is long gone. Tesla’s only hope for survival is to fire Elon and get a competent, sane, sober, non-Nazi CEO.

UpbeatSkeptic 2025-06-30 13:29

What I don’t get is why investors and analysts assume there will be such massive demand for robo-taxis. They regularly talk about TRILLIONS of dollars in potential revenue… meanwhile Uber and Lyft combined only did $50 billion globally last year. So even if Tesla took every penny of their revenue, that’s still 95% short of a trillion. Maybe Robo-taxis will double or triple the market (I doubt it) - that’s still nowhere close to a trillion dollars. People like owning and driving their own cars. That won’t change. Has anyone bothered to study the potential market for Robo-taxis? If so I sure haven’t seen it. Every analyst has just decided it’s going to be TRILLIONS… based on nothing but a wish and a dream. So never mind that Tesla’s tech is shit - even if it worked perfectly, there simply isn’t enough of a potential market to justify the insane stock price. It will be under $100 in 18 months or less - mark my words.

sidc42 2025-06-30 14:18

LMAO. You don't understand shit. It's down 34%... But you're not paying attention to where it still is. Toyota sold over 11 million cars globally last year and Wall Street says it's worth $271 billion. Tesla sold 1.8 million cars last year with sales and profit declines that make it's fundamentals about as bad as fucking Stellantis and yet Wall Street says it's worth $1 trillion (TODAY, after your 34% decline). If fundamentals mattered it would be trading closer to $30 than over $300. And that's the stock's real problem. Tesla is a meme stock and Elon's BS is literally the only thing holding it there. Fire him and investors might start valuing it on fundamentals and the company collapses like a house of cards. That's why people joke, "Oh look, bad news for Tesla I bet the stock goes up 5% on that."

Few_Expression_5417 2025-07-05 13:38

Polarized filters?

Add comment

Login is required to comment.

Login with Google