← Back to topic list

Tesla’s Approach to Autonomy: 7x Safer and 7x Cheaper than Waymo

Sohmal3 | 2025-06-18 08:01 | 22 views

Comments (12)
AutoModerator 2025-06-18 08:01

**Unwelcoming toxic/griefing/pessimistic sniping comments that are not on topic and don’t move the discussion forward will be removed. A ban will be issued if necessary. Consider this before commenting. Report posts or comments that violate the [Rules](https://www.reddit.com/mod/teslamotors/rules/). Thank you.** If you are unable to find it, use the link to it. We are not a support sub, please make sure to use the proper resources if you have questions: [Official Tesla Support](https://www.tesla.com/support), [r/TeslaLounge](https://www.reddit.com/r/TeslaLounge/) personal content | [Discord Live Chat](https://discord.gg/tesla) for anything. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/teslamotors) if you have any questions or concerns.*

mcot2222 2025-06-18 22:05

If autonomy is a data and AI compute problem as Musk says that may change your math given Waymo is part of Google.

sshuit 2025-06-18 22:49

The data is pretty meaningless since the waymo and Tesla definitions of accidents differ. Tesla is only counting airbag deployments or pretensioner engagements while waymo's definition is much more broad. I'd take this data with large grains of salt.

1FrostySlime 2025-06-18 23:23

I think that comparing the safety of different autonomy levels is kinda weird. Like Tesla is safer but it's also always supervised by a human. I'm sure that if waymo was a level 2 system it would be safer but then waymo also wouldn't exist. Waymo also uses substantially broader definitions of an accident so the rate is probably not as dramatic as what they're claiming.

[deleted] 2025-06-19 02:34

One of them is driving real rides without drivers and the other one isn’t so…

TETZUO_AUS 2025-06-19 03:01

Take it with a grain of salt. Comes from a blog / X account that is biased to Tesla.

Realistic-Bother-815 2025-06-19 09:19

Bloomberg?

LeakyFish 2025-06-19 14:52

The only autonomous vehicle fleet in operation that actually posted it's safety data was Waymo.

AttackingHobo 2025-06-20 17:37

> pretensioner engagements That is pretty broad is it not? I activate the pretensioners at least once a week. Never been in a collision with my Tesla. FYI hard acceleration activates them. As does high g cornering. Don't even need to get the tires chirping on lose traction to get the pretensioners activated. When you accelerate hard, and feel the seat belt tighten? That is the pretensioner. Any event <5 seconds after FSD was driving is logged in the data. So, when I give it acceleration around a corner, that is a logged event.

remulasce 2025-06-22 17:50

The pretensioner is pyrotechnic activated. It cannot be triggered repeatedly without physically replacing it. It's basically a small charge of gunpowder that releases gas that moves a piston. You're probably thinking of a regular seatbelt lockup.

SirConfused1289 2025-06-23 04:13

No, you cannot repeatedly activate a pretensioner. Those are only activated like an air bag, in the event of a crash.

AttackingHobo 2025-06-26 18:43

There are actually two stages. One is driven by the vision system, and it tightens the seatbelt before an accident. Seconds stage is the pyrotechnic.

Add comment

Login is required to comment.

Login with Google