← Back to topic list

Tesla Applies for California Permit to Launch Robotaxi Service

chrisdh79 | 2025-02-27 22:29 | 407 views

Comments (98)
AutoModerator 2025-02-27 22:29

#[r/cybertruck](https://www.reddit.com/r/cybertruck/) is now private. If you are unable to find it, here is a link to it. As we are not a support sub, please make sure to use the proper resources if you have questions: [Official Tesla Support](https://www.tesla.com/support), [r/TeslaSupport](https://www.reddit.com/r/TeslaSupport/) | [r/TeslaLounge](https://www.reddit.com/r/TeslaLounge/) personal content | [Discord Live Chat](https://discord.gg/tesla) for anything. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/teslamotors) if you have any questions or concerns.*

metarx 2025-02-27 22:43

Prolly deny it, as there will be no regulation over how safe they will be

deten 2025-02-27 22:51

Even if it doesnt happen yet, its just crazy how close we are to actually hitting "the future" I always imagined as a kid.

Hohh20 2025-02-27 22:55

We are already in the future I imagined. I never thought I would live to see the day when I can relax while my car successfully drives me the entire way from pulling out of my parking spot to parking at the front door. Once they get the automatic parking spot selection finished, you won't need to do more than put the pin in and press 1 button.

ChunkyThePotato 2025-02-27 22:56

They didn't deny Waymo's application. If Tesla can achieve an equal or greater level of safety compared to Waymo, then there's no reason to deny it. But of course the threshold should just be average human safety, because if your threshold is above that, then you're actually causing more deaths to occur since humans would be driving instead of the self-driving cars.

jasoncross00 2025-02-27 22:57

"The application, first reported by Bloomberg, reportedly includes details about driver’s license requirements and drug testing protocols, suggesting that Tesla will operate with human drivers before transitioning to a driverless fleet." This is what Waymo did (years ago) - start with human safety drivers that sit there and do nothing 99.99% of the time until they can demonstrate sufficient safety to actually go driverless.

[deleted] 2025-02-27 23:17

Oh yeah I definitely don't see that getting boycotted and vandalized

unpluggedcord 2025-02-27 23:21

Waymo is already here and works.

[deleted] 2025-02-27 23:26

[deleted]

ClumpOfCheese 2025-02-27 23:27

In SF now, so many Waymo.

LeifEriksonASDF 2025-02-27 23:34

Holy goalposts

unpluggedcord 2025-02-27 23:35

Did I say that? I replied to a comment about "close to hitting the future", we're not close.... were already there.

[deleted] 2025-02-27 23:35

[deleted]

Bderken 2025-02-27 23:38

Wrong person

ChunkyThePotato 2025-02-27 23:39

In terms of personal ownership and/or ubiquitous availability, we're not there yet.

giannis_antekonumpo 2025-02-27 23:42

But the robotaxi doesn't even have a steering wheel and pedals right?

giannis_antekonumpo 2025-02-27 23:47

The threshold should be way stricter than average human safety imo. Otherwise, were just replacing trash human drivers with trash AI drivers. And there's no reason to do that as it just funnels more money into billionaires' pockets and leads to more lost jobs. Also, at least humans can face the consequences of their mistakes unlike AI where some large corporation places an arbitrary valuation on injuries and settles with insurance companies.

unpluggedcord 2025-02-27 23:47

Fair

Deathstroke5289 2025-02-27 23:50

Isn’t it a two seater though? So one rider only?

Altruistic_Welder 2025-02-27 23:52

They may not start with the Cybercab, Model Ys instead.

bartturner 2025-02-27 23:54

There is Waymo that has now been doing it for years and now doing over 200,000 fares a week. Think we hit "the future" years ago thanks to Waymo.

bartturner 2025-02-27 23:55

> If Tesla can achieve an equal or greater level of safety compared to Waymo That is what is going to be really tough. Waymo has run a really clean operation over the years in terms of safety. Going to be a tough bar.

jasoncross00 2025-02-27 23:56

Neither this nor the Austin thing in June are likely to be the dedicated robotaxi vehicle. It is not in production yet (and they haven't even started tooling up a line anywhere), hasn't gone through the necessary regulatory and safety process to be on the streets, and so on. This is going to be using Model 3/Y at first.

[deleted] 2025-02-27 23:57

[deleted]

krusticka 2025-02-27 23:58

> average human safety It is a robotaxi so the if we keep the same logic the threshold should be an "average" cab driver.

jasoncross00 2025-02-27 23:58

The robotaxi vehicle is not in production, and they're not even tooling up for production yet. It is not expected to be in production until next year. The robotaxi SERVICE will initially deploy with Model 3/Y.

mucello23 2025-02-28 00:01

Unless you live anywhere else. In which case it’s still very much in the far future. Hard for me to imagine seeing this in Australia, for instance, for another 20 years.

Lexsteel11 2025-02-28 00:02

Just some dude with an Xbox controller fighting for his life with a drunk person next to him lol

bartturner 2025-02-28 00:03

Australia is pretty easy and definitely it will be no where close to 20 years. I am retired and spend half my time traveling SEA. Just arrived in Cebu this morning for example. Places like the Old Quarter in Vietnam or Bangkok are the places that will take longer but not even these places anywhere close to 20 years. Australia driving is easy in comparison and more importantly labor is expensive compared to most of SEA. I just took a taxi from the airport to my hotel in Cebu and paid less than $5 USD. That is what will make it harder in some parts of the world but NOT Australia.

Lexsteel11 2025-02-28 00:04

Yeah way I has to extensively train their algos on specific roads is my understanding. Vision/GPS based protocol is much harder to implement but will dominate because it will naturally work anywhere

Lexsteel11 2025-02-28 00:05

One thing FSD is missing is parking lot entrance selection. When I drop off or pick up my daughter at school dictates the entrance I have to use.

Lexsteel11 2025-02-28 00:06

After driving in Rome once- I have no idea how they will solve for those markets. Everything operates on social protocols not traffic signs and lane lines

libben 2025-02-28 00:12

If works means work like shit and creates chaos in traffic and dont report interventions when they need help in many situations. In SF they probably have a couple of hundreds human interventions pilots that goes and help all time. Waymo as it sits currently is just a fancy railroad car with no big future for scaling.

HoPMiX 2025-02-28 00:13

I’m pretty sure teslas road map eventually is to allow owners to put their car to work when they aren’t using it. That’s isn’t Waymo’s model right?

unpluggedcord 2025-02-28 00:37

As some who lives in sf I personally have not had to intervene but okay.

ASIWYFA 2025-02-28 00:44

Waymo is worlds ahead of Tesla. There is no world in which Cali moving forward is friendly to Tesla anymore.

djrbx 2025-02-28 01:04

They probably wont even try in those markets. It's similar to many countries in asia where the road lines are just "suggestions" and not the rule. There would be too many variables that they will not be able to account for making the liability too much of a hassle.

VeryRealHuman23 2025-02-28 01:19

Really both will work. In theory Tesla should be golden but waymo has proven it can work in high density urban areas which is a viable business model too…both can succeed

VeryRealHuman23 2025-02-28 01:20

In theory yes but like hell I’m loaning out my model x to make a few bucks that’s lost immediately to depreciation snd asshole riders causing damage.

NO_REFERENCE_FRAME 2025-02-28 01:20

Of course it will

ChunkyThePotato 2025-02-28 01:29

True. Their safety record is very impressive. But like I said, the threshold *should* be average human safety. And then it should move up from there as self-driving cars become commonplace.

thebiglebowskiisfine 2025-02-28 01:31

It's happening!

thebiglebowskiisfine 2025-02-28 01:33

The thing is - if Tesla can drop 25K taxis like Bird scooters @ .20 per mile, it's game-set-match.

ackermann 2025-02-28 01:50

Last I heard, Waymo can’t do freeways, which is a pretty big restriction for all but the shortest trips. And can’t even reach the SF airport, one of the more common destinations for taxis.

Unicycldev 2025-02-28 01:52

Not really.

Unicycldev 2025-02-28 01:52

Right now, no one can do L4 driving on freeways.

jtucker323 2025-02-28 02:14

The Austin launch was confirmed by Franz to be cybercabs.

FIREgenomics 2025-02-28 02:34

I recall them having the ability to only allow your friends and family to use it. Maybe not for $$, but I like that feature of it works.

Neat_Reference7559 2025-02-28 02:38

Waymo exists

corner 2025-02-28 02:38

That seems like the “easier” problem to solve though, and just waiting on regulations?

unpluggedcord 2025-02-28 02:55

My god y'all gonna pick apart everything you can. The fact of the matter is, Waymo can do cities, without a driver, and Tesla can't. I say this as a two Tesla FSD owner.

unpluggedcord 2025-02-28 02:56

Nothing about what I said was to disparage Tesla.

ChunkyThePotato 2025-02-28 03:03

This isn't just replacing cab drivers.

ChunkyThePotato 2025-02-28 03:05

He probably just meant robotaxis and misspoke. Not necessarily referring to the specific vehicle. Just the service.

ChunkyThePotato 2025-02-28 03:07

If Tesla's system works and Waymo doesn't pivot hard, Waymo is dead. Tesla destroys them on cost and scale. But that is an if.

[deleted] 2025-02-28 03:20

[deleted]

Kinda_Lukewarm 2025-02-28 03:37

If history from a line of competitors is any guide this means they are ten years out

bartturner 2025-02-28 03:50

What it should be is very different than what it actually is. It is kind of like planes compared to cars in terms of safety. People are just going to have far higher expectations with computer driven cars versus human driven. But Waymo so far has it covered. They are exceeding pretty much everyones expectations in terms of safety. To have gone that many miles and the only ones and not have a single accident with injuries that was your fault is just amazing.

Karlitos00 2025-02-28 04:08

I live in Phoenix and everyone I know loves waymo and have had zero issues but okay

ChunkyThePotato 2025-02-28 04:22

I sincerely hope inflated expectations don't get in the way of world-changing progress. But yes, Waymo has been incredible in terms of safety.

SnooPeppers3755 2025-02-28 04:23

I'm a believer after driver the Juniper last week, they are ready

Big_Comparison2849 2025-02-28 04:34

Who is going to clean up the throw up in the back on Friday and Saturday nights with no human driver?

Present-Ad-9598 2025-02-28 05:03

June in Austin is actual Cybercabs, I live within 5-20 minutes (not being exact) from the factory, and they’re definitely starting small production soon

Present-Ad-9598 2025-02-28 05:04

As far as I know they announced full scale production next year with pilot production this year, like how every other launch has went

ackermann 2025-02-28 05:06

Interesting, considering freeways generally seem to be the easier problem to solve. Many of the level 2 and 3 systems by various manufacturers work _only_ on freeways. I suppose it’s because if there’s an accident, the consequence would be far worse, due to the higher speeds

ackermann 2025-02-28 05:16

I didn’t mean to come across as bashing Waymo, and I’m definitely not saying Tesla is better. I just thought the fact that it can’t do freeways was interesting to note, for others reading. It surprised me to learn that, I thought Waymo had solved all roads in SF. Since in many ways, freeways can be the easiest roads to solve (many other level 2 and 3 systems work _only_ on freeways). I’d love to take a ride in a Waymo someday, if I’m ever visiting one of their cities!

softtaft 2025-02-28 05:20

There is no regulatory or safety process needed.

mthrfkn 2025-02-28 06:36

I means it’s not Rome but Waymo navigate the books and crannies of San Francisco’s hills just fine and they can be nuts.

outkast8459 2025-02-28 06:59

Waymos are now on the 101 to south SF(human assisted) it won’t be long until they’re without drivers and going further. There’s very little reason to think there will be any technical hurdles here given driving around the hilly gridlocked city of SF is much harder than the freeway.

thebiglebowskiisfine 2025-02-28 07:30

I didn't take it that way! Bartender - this one is on me....

FPS_Warex 2025-02-28 09:26

Ultimately its the software that needs to be tested and judged, and that is obviously transferable between the models !

continuousmulligan 2025-02-28 10:48

Rip tesla

likwidfuzion 2025-02-28 12:05

There’s Waymo than you think. So many.

VeryRealHuman23 2025-02-28 13:07

> friends so yes, no one

[deleted] 2025-02-28 14:59

If you get the chance to try Waymo in a city that has it do it! I did it in SF this month and felt like a kid it was awesome. Obviously after a few time the novelty goes away but in my opinion it was the most luxury car service I’ve used. Listened to my Spotify whole thing to myself ect. But the first time or two blew my mind

lensandscope 2025-02-28 17:00

can’t do freeways, for now. just be patient

jasoncross00 2025-02-28 18:08

I would think so. I wasn't complaining or criticizing--just letting people who didn't understand "driver in the car" for California know that they're not using the RoboCab cars, and they're not going to use them in Austin in June either (see reporting like this Car & Driver report - https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a63632919/tesla-robotaxi-paid-service-start-austin-texas/).

G00bernaculum 2025-02-28 18:32

Look at waymo. It’s active

ClumpOfCheese 2025-02-28 19:58

Yeah absolutely would never risk my car like that.

dtpearson 2025-02-28 21:32

Same, but think of the same car in 10-20 years time, will we still be so precious about it? You could trade it in for $10k on your next car or send it out to robotaxi and make twice that a year, paying off your new car.

dtpearson 2025-02-28 21:35

Most of those cases will be automatically fixed when the first few vehicles get their FSD overridden to go to the "right" entrance, the AI will just redirect all future FSD drives to that entrance. There will also likely be a feedback mechanism to "fix" problems like that.

dtpearson 2025-02-28 21:38

The interior camera will see that there is an issue (and people will be able to flag a problem in the app, and reject that car to ride in) and that car will redirect to a cleaning station.

Forzahorizonguy 2025-03-01 06:48

I will always want to ability to drive. Or ride a motorcycle.

RaspberryLeather1250 2025-03-01 19:40

Is this part of the federal governments $400 million Armored Tesla order? Give the president $200 million, and you get a $400 million dollar order. G_d Bless America 🇺🇸!

Cyleux 2025-03-02 01:20

its so simple to build and arent being sold in mass people dont understand that its happening (idk on the software front though)

Glittering-Delay-43 2025-03-02 02:29

Really surprised to see SF as a market here the Waymo gets enough literal spray painting when it sits in traffic. There’s already a zoo’s market here and cruise. I think just shut down altogether but now that he is not doing anything with Uber how many apps do you possibly need to order these?

CobiiWI 2025-03-02 02:55

Waymo is geofenced. It’s not actual smart FSD

unpluggedcord 2025-03-02 07:32

Okay? “Smart FSD” can’t drive without human intervention.

mchinsky 2025-03-02 18:15

Waymo charges more than Uber and takes 50% more time according to studies, and they still don't make any money, so waymo is a great science experiment, but is not a scalable model when the car costs $150k to $180,000 each

Jesse-359 2025-03-04 05:19

What a joke. Who's going to use it? Taxi services run in cities. Cities are predominantly working class democrats with a comparative handful of conservative big spenders. Big spenders don't need taxies, and democrats aren't going to use Tesla, so he's got no market. Tesla is #$%@ed.

bartturner 2025-03-04 22:37

Freeways are a lot harder because of safety. Waymo is safety first. Why they have yet had a serious accident with injuries their fault and not had any fatalities.

bartturner 2025-03-04 22:37

Not a regulation issue. Freeways are a lot harder because of safety.

bartturner 2025-03-04 22:38

Tesla will be geofenced. No different than Waymo.

Southern-Spirit 2025-03-10 17:29

but don't be patient with Tesla yeah no bias here lol.

lensandscope 2025-03-10 20:12

what are you suggesting?

Niaaal 2025-03-11 15:04

Every other car manufacturer can offer this in the future too. The Tesla leading edge will not last long when all the other manufacturers enter the game

KaleLate4894 2025-03-18 01:57

https://stocks.apple.com/ALkjFu1I9SHu22Hpqt9AfAw No it crashes into walls.

Mythozz2020 2025-03-23 00:17

I can't see how Tesla FSD is ready.. I was in a brand new Tesla this weekend and it almost killed me on a one lane freeway.. It saw the car in front of us go around a slower car.. The lane divider line on the display turned from yellow to white.. It changed lanes and was happy to drive head on into traffic from the opposite direction..

Add comment

Login is required to comment.

Login with Google