AutoModerator
2026-03-01 08:11
https://sh.reddit.com/mod/teslamotors/wiki/teslachargingrecommendationsbatteryhistory
*I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/TeslaModel3) if you have any questions or concerns.*
AllCapNoBrake
2026-03-01 12:47

oureux
2026-03-01 12:56
https://preview.redd.it/1364xab9lfmg1.jpeg?width=1179&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1f443dfb594d9a61840f03e7bfddc12944f1c6f4
This is my 2018 model 3’s battery health. I’m at 40k miles
Tilmanstoa5ty
2026-03-01 13:00
Why would you get that number after purchasing? I‘d never buy an almost six year old ev without a bettery certificate.
jiffylube1024A
2026-03-01 13:04
If it’s a long range model that’s still fine and expected given the age.
zeletrik
2026-03-01 13:06
The first 10% of the SoH drops fast anyway then it flattens out, so it’s pretty reasonable.
LFP battery handles 0-100 better but it will degrade. Not to mention the compared 2023 one anyway has a bigger battery to start with so you would never get to that range anyway
Seansong82
2026-03-01 13:13
Two different types of Batteries, people should not be buying legacy models pre 2022 or it will come with lots of regrets.
veul
2026-03-01 13:30
How did you get the percentage in the app? Mine just says its healthy.
oureux
2026-03-01 13:33
Yeah it’s a long range. I don’t ever feel like it doesn’t have enough range to get me where I’m going, especially given the amount of super chargers in my area.
Jaydiknight89
2026-03-01 13:33
Same 2025 M3LR
Buzzeh
2026-03-01 13:35
Did you run the full test?
veul
2026-03-01 13:35
Thats what im asking is it app or car?
GIJOW
2026-03-01 13:39
App but you need to run the test in the car first
2019_Stealth
2026-03-01 13:42
A few weeks ago I cleaned leaves, pollen, and bugs out of the radiators on my 2019 Model 3. It improved my range. I highly recommend it. I did not remove the front bumper but was still able to clean 80 — 90% of the blockage.
pretzelgreg317
2026-03-01 13:44
I have a 2023 with LFP batteries and charge to 100% regularly for almost 3 years and 43k miles i did a battery test and came up at 96% one year after purchase and 93 percent in late January. Mileage range drops a LOT in cold weather, but in the summer im still getting 250 plus on a car rated for 272 new. LFP has been the bomb for me
zeletrik
2026-03-01 13:50
So you lost 7% in less then 3 years. As I mentioned the first 10 drops quickly. Not in months both the 4 year-ish is right around the ballpark.
For reference I have a 2019 LR with 86% of SoH so that’s 14% in around 6 years, and OP lost 15% in about 5, all of these are in the same bucket statistically speaking
NotAnAIOrAmI
2026-03-01 13:58
My wife charges her 7 year old 2018 Model 3 at home on a level 2 Tesla wall charger almost exclusively. She has 130K miles on it. She still gets around 270 miles of charge when the temperature is decent.
<shrug>
pretzelgreg317
2026-03-01 13:58
Will see as LFP batteries flatten (more) after initial drop. I have a 2024 model Y LR AWD thats 1.5 years and 25k miles that was at 92% after a year. It was a noticeable difference in intial battery degradation. Havent run a test on it this year but i do see the LFP batteries as being more robust and easiest to “live” with (but really take a hit to range in cold)
Deep_Presentation725
2026-03-01 14:01
You’re comparing apples to oranges you and your friend has different battery chemistries. He has an LFP and you have a NCA. LFPs are known to be much better at preserving battery health.
NCA as mentioned earlier degrades the most within the first couple of years then slows down. The test showed your battery is health and within limits. Just drive and enjoy your car. 🤦🏻
Wiltockin
2026-03-01 14:15
https://preview.redd.it/fsn16e7qyfmg1.jpeg?width=1179&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8262a861a2fdf84c22478a843404b3f2ca2b802d
This is our 2022 M3LR at 75k miles, charged at home except for road trips. Definitely feel the extra charge time now on one of our typical routes HOU<>RGV. For city driving, keeping it at 60% SoC still gets us everywhere we need.
lohmatij
2026-03-01 15:15
I mention the chemistry. His battery is also bigger from the factory.
lohmatij
2026-03-01 15:17
What’s your mileage? I believe thats what important, not the age?
Desperate-Review-727
2026-03-01 15:17
The battery test makes your battery worse. So every time you run this, expect less range and less percentage.
zeletrik
2026-03-01 15:20
The cycles count, not the mileage or age. While they correlate the devil lies in full cycles.
My mileage’s is over 90k
Alex_dee1988
2026-03-01 15:21
What's this about keeping it plugged in? Isint a battery happy place 55%? So if I plug it in and keep the limit at 55% (when appropriate) will be the winning formula ???
lohmatij
2026-03-01 15:44
Oh man, most people fail to indicate if they have FSD or not, if you only aim for “battery certificate” you cut almost 95% of listings. People forget to put VINs, some later refuse to disclose it even after you ask. One guy claimed “autopilot included”, which was actually FSD. Not everyone is tech savvy.
lohmatij
2026-03-01 15:44
Yep
Tilmanstoa5ty
2026-03-01 15:50
That’s not true at all. Bot matter, cycles and age. If you don’t drive a lot the age degradation will outweigh the cycle degradation by a lot. In addition to that average SoC over time and temperature play a big part. A car that was mostly charged to 100% in a hot climate will most likely experience more degradation than a car that was only charged to 80% in a moderate climate.
Tilmanstoa5ty
2026-03-01 15:51
Yeah not everybody lists it right away but you ask for that stuff before buying lol. If they can’t deliver you choose another one. It’s not like model 3s are ultra rare.
lohmatij
2026-03-01 15:55
Yep. Road trips are my biggest gripe.
I frankly didn’t realize how much a difference 270/207 range makes. Not only it drives less, but apparently it also charges much much slower. It’s not a big deal for city driving, but I’m on my first road trip and need to drive from Flagstaff to LA tomorrow. Typical trip includes a 140 mile stretch of I-40 between Barstow and Needles which my car wouldn’t be able to make no matter how long I charge in Needles. The necessity to take a longer route and charge more often adds up an extra hour to the trip. LR cuts it even further but only by 20 minutes.
lohmatij
2026-03-01 16:09
Some people say it’s 70%, some say it’s 60%, I don’t know frankly. But Tesla itself recommends to keep it plugged, I guess the car can keep battery warm this way (when not plugged in, battery preconditioning starts at lower temperatures).
lohmatij
2026-03-01 16:13
Well, I saw the range when I bought, it’s the same after battery test.
As I described in a different comment, I didn’t realize how big of a difference it’s from a practical standpoint.
zeletrik
2026-03-01 16:29
The second part, while true, makes no sense in this context.
Age and mileage are only relevant because of natural loss of SoC that would lead to different cycle count. It’s simple, if you don’t drive it but keep it charged always to 80% then you still pump in the cycles, that’s why.
Tilmanstoa5ty
2026-03-01 17:06
That’s not true either lol. A battery will age regardless of cycles.
zeletrik
2026-03-01 17:10
I’m not sure what part you don’t get. Sure, calendar aging can degrade battery but it’s statistically insignificant compared to cycles, provided it’s not kept in extreme conditions.
Tilmanstoa5ty
2026-03-01 18:31
You are so confidently incorrect it’s funny. Just have a look at the data yourself. [https://www.geotab.com/blog/ev-battery-study/](https://www.geotab.com/blog/ev-battery-study/)
https://preview.redd.it/qatpdg149hmg1.jpeg?width=1320&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=b13ecd5313aa071b3103d2f14cae6b5af0df7b58
Seansong82
2026-03-01 19:21
Damn dude, if it makes you feel better, I hopped on the Tesla train with very little DD and bought a used 2023 RWD before realizing the staggering difference btwn the Refreshed models. Ended up losing money but traded in my '23 RWD (amazing car btw) for an almost new M3HP. The regret was eating me alive and even though I threw a couple thousand down the drain, I don't regret it one bit lol.
Ancient-Sandwich9400
2026-03-01 21:03
How so?
Wiltockin
2026-03-01 21:11
Staring with the LR range helps vs a SR for sure but it did take me by surprise that it’s a thing that will affect the car for as long as we own it. Aiming to keep it for a good 8-10 years and I do enjoy the occasional long road trip so we’ll see when getting between superchargers becomes an issue (especially in Mexico).
The reason it takes longer now is because we’re charging more of the battery compared to its total capacity when before the same kilowatts was a smaller percentage. Eventually will need 100% charge to make 150 miles at 80mph and that’s a good +40min charge.
lohmatij
2026-03-01 22:34
Oh man, Mexico is so spread out with chargers I don’t even dream about it ;)