← Back to topic list

Tesla confirms Cybertruck sales are down to just ~5,000 units

Zorkmid123 | 2025-07-02 16:37 | 1404 views

Comments (304)
muhamadgolly 2025-07-02 16:43

Look mommy, I drawed a twuck

Jonesy1966 2025-07-02 16:43

That many, huh?

-Lorne-Malvo- 2025-07-02 16:44

Here is the short version - cyberdorkwagons are selling less than 10% of what they predicted and planned for. They set up manufacturing to sell 250, 000 per year and are selling closer to 20,000. "what the blade runner would have driven" lol Still, 20,000 is a lot of dorks.

ManifestDestinysChld 2025-07-02 16:45

They actually, legitimately planned to sell a quarter-million of these things per year. It's the automotive version of "they will greet us as liberators!" No, Elon. In fact, everybody thinks you're annoying as hell and your ideas are lame.

Conscious-Bee-5691 2025-07-02 16:46

Always reminds me to Homer who draw a car for his Brother

[deleted] 2025-07-02 16:53

The 2019 cybertruck with a $40k pricetag and a relatively normal Tesla CEO, they probably sell that many. The reality of the 2025 cybertruck with its $100k price, terrible bugs/build, sieg heiling freak for a Tesla CEO, it's surprising they even sell 20k a year.

TJ_Will 2025-07-02 16:53

Mommy, Mommy, nobody wants to buy my twuck.

Samjamesjr 2025-07-02 16:54

All that tooling and line design for these numbers. Sounds like CT dorks are an exclusive club! Bullish!

razor_train 2025-07-02 16:55

Those abandoned mall parking lots don't stand a chance.

Jamaal_Lannister 2025-07-02 16:55

Never would have guessed the number was that low, since I feel like I see lots of those DePloreans here in the PNW.

ThankuConan 2025-07-02 16:55

The Edsel of our time.

Janky_Forklift 2025-07-02 16:56

It is also just genuinely an overpriced, poorly built, underperforming, and super ugly vehicle. I don’t know why anyone thought it was a serious product.

[deleted] 2025-07-02 16:58

You'd still have to pay me $40k to drive that ugly POS.

[deleted] 2025-07-02 17:00

Lol fair! Every time I see one in person I'm in awe of how stupid they look.

plumpedupawesome 2025-07-02 17:00

I'm surprised there's that many incompetent dumbasses buying them. Looks like the human failures are desperately trying to find a matching car that fails just as much as them.

NoMoreVillains 2025-07-02 17:02

Why couldn't Elon have just designed a regular looking electric truck? Yeah, given all his recent nonsense sales would've still tanked, like the rest of Tesla, but at least it would've been attractive to start with to more then just Elon stans convincing themselves it wasn't ugly af

LibMike 2025-07-02 17:05

It’s crazy. Just imagine if they made a “normal” truck, doesn’t even have to be a big utility focused truck. Normal style. It would have sold like crazy. Instead the big sellers are F150 Lightning and Rivian. I’ve owned two teslas but I’m waiting a year or two to switch to a normal EV truck.

DietOfKerbango 2025-07-02 17:06

I’d do it for $20k if I wasn’t taxed on the gift (price of the truck + $20k) and I’m permitted to paste signs on the panels that reads “I won this POS truck in a contest.”

Ok_Subject1265 2025-07-02 17:06

My thoughts exactly. Once the influencers returned their leases and couldn’t milk anymore content from them, who is left to buy one?

Red-FFFFFF-Blue 2025-07-02 17:06

So will Slate succeed where the Cybertruck failed?

readonlycomment 2025-07-02 17:06

Drugs

tanrock2003 2025-07-02 17:07

Tesla's killing it! The company I mean. Stock jumps 4.53% today on the news. I'll never understand this.

Left_Consequence_886 2025-07-02 17:07

Cult of personality is a dangerous marketing model. Can they be effective? Sure, but it’s easy to become volatile.

Calm_Range_3279 2025-07-02 17:07

An Edsel is a compliment. I think it's more comparable to a Yugo.

[deleted] 2025-07-02 17:09

Me too. Thankfully seeing them in the wild has been rarer.

skyfire-x 2025-07-02 17:09

Maths says about 55 fools are born per day.

tonydtonyd 2025-07-02 17:10

You’re crazy. I’m going to need life changing money to drive one of those. In a VHCOL area, we’re talking a minimum of 4.5M tax free.

Past_Page_4281 2025-07-02 17:10

Dude just had to stay out of politics I bet this crapcar would have sold as well setting a 'trend'

werpu 2025-07-02 17:10

He wanted his personal Homer mobile... except that the Homer mobile was actually a good car!

hypespud 2025-07-02 17:11

I would love to buy that car though, big difference 🤣

Luthais327 2025-07-02 17:12

And the stock is up 12% as of 1pm est. Edit. +15% by end of day. This stock is so far removed from reality it's astonishing.

Zorkmid123 2025-07-02 17:13

At least Homer’s brother realized it’d be a flop. Elon saw the Cybertruck and thought it’d be a hit.

demonlag 2025-07-02 17:13

A "Truckla" would have flown off the lot.

Zorkmid123 2025-07-02 17:14

It was always unrealistic that Tesla could make a $40k Cybertruck profitably.

skyfire-x 2025-07-02 17:15

We know what "the Blade Runner" drove: A Peugeot 3 wheeled flying car.

Jonesy1966 2025-07-02 17:16

This is way worse than Edsel. The Edsel wasn't actually a 'bad' car, it just tried to appeal to everyone and didn't quite live up to expectations. It was a car genuinely ahead of its time. It still sold 116K annually. Almost 6x CT's numbers. CT is by far the worst major automotive launch of all time.

Jonesy1966 2025-07-02 17:17

You're probably seeing the same 4 or 5. They just stick out a lot more

7DollarsOfHoobastanq 2025-07-02 17:17

Bingo. Not something I really see myself driving but honestly I don’t mind the look of the thing. What I do mind is the shitty mechanical design and execution along with the brand having become toxic thanks to Elon. If the price was reasonable and overall build quality was at least on par with the rest of their lineup (not even that high of a bar) I think they could have been quite popular.

Sharkwatcher314 2025-07-02 17:17

lol reminded of the monk episode In Mexico. I think it is the drugs, I don’t know how but trust me it is drugs

Jonesy1966 2025-07-02 17:18

Ego, drugs, mental health, no-one willing to tell him 'no'

Red-FFFFFF-Blue 2025-07-02 17:19

Underrated comment. Edsel’s were 1) Overly stylish 2) expensive vs Ford’s own existing models 3) Over hyped (marketing, E Day) 4) Confusing to customers (Is it luxury? Who are they selling to?) 5) Poor workmanship

Jamaal_Lannister 2025-07-02 17:21

Not sure, since a lot of the ones I’ve seen have customs paint jobs/wraps.

OutlandishnessOk3310 2025-07-02 17:21

Now just waiting for a video showing all the leftover cyber trucks driving themselves to the recycling centre.

Red-FFFFFF-Blue 2025-07-02 17:21

The ability to fail up in capitalism is astonishing.

tallsmallboy44 2025-07-02 17:21

Not if the EV tax credit goes away. Why pay $27.5k for a truck with manual windows when a maverick is $28k and comes with the creature comforts you expect out of a modern vehicle

kahner 2025-07-02 17:22

The 2019 cybertruck with a $40k price tag was always just a lie though. As were the initial specs.

infinit9 2025-07-02 17:22

It is still selling? I'm impressed.

XKeyscore666 2025-07-02 17:22

$40k is reasonable if the quality control was better. At that price you should get at least 5 years without catastrophic problems.

fossilnews 2025-07-02 17:24

Yeah, but they only missed by 92%. \- Tesla Fanboy

zedk47 2025-07-02 17:25

I can see a movie in 20 years where the Cybertruck is a key character and landmark of mid-2020's "taste"

Chippopotanuse 2025-07-02 17:25

It does truck stuff!

ecplectico 2025-07-02 17:26

I question the intelligence of anyone who buys a Cybertruck.

[deleted] 2025-07-02 17:29

Stock up over 4%. Makes sense.

liquidgrill 2025-07-02 17:33

Jesus Christ. I feel like I could build and sell 5,000 trucks by myself if I put my mind to it.

mgt-kuradal 2025-07-02 17:35

Tooling can’t be that complicated to stamp out flat sheets of stainless steel

phatelectribe 2025-07-02 17:35

Ineos are now selling twice or the number of grenadiers and the price tag starts at $80k. It’s not really a matter of price. It’s that the cyber truck is a truly terrible product, made by a company with a toxic image.

mtnbike2 2025-07-02 17:36

5,000 units per what?

MarchMurky8649 2025-07-02 17:39

One thing about this stupid design, which I hadn't thought of until I read it in a review recently, is that you cannot see the front of the thing, at all, from the inside. Any other vehicle you can at least see where that part of your vehicle in front of you ends, which can be quite helpful if you want to, say, avoid bumping into other vehicles, people crossing the road, or anything else out there in the rest of the world. However, the way the windscreen slopes like that makes it impossible to see any part of the outside of your car from the inside. MuskGenius™.

Mugwump6506 2025-07-02 17:39

Those are the ones Musk bought to give away as Christmas presents.

Apprehensive-Box-8 2025-07-02 17:41

Fiat sold more multiplas…

AustinBike 2025-07-02 17:41

>Still, 20,000 is a lot of dorks. Actually, that number will be lower in future quarters. There is a finite market for those things, they are tapping it out.

[deleted] 2025-07-02 17:42

A Maverick isnt 28k other than a stripper model for fleets. A nice Lariat is about 40k- and the cheapo one goes up about 3k year. That said, Id take a Maverick over a Slate and that includes the steel wheeled cheapest model.

SigSweet 2025-07-02 17:52

This is exactly why the design is so bad. It is purposely low effort to reduce the cost of building it.

trogladogla 2025-07-02 17:56

Can confirm every single one is in Irvine,CA.

sffunfun 2025-07-02 17:57

I had a pre-order for one, at that price point with all of that technology It was a no-brainer. But not at $120,000 with so many problems.

MoveOverBieber 2025-07-02 17:57

Sure, honey, at those prices, how about a fire sale?

goomyman 2025-07-02 18:00

I remember the idea of cyber truck being steel was a single giant mold making it lighter and stronger. Instead it ended up just being steel for no reason at all.

Brave_Quantity_5261 2025-07-02 18:01

Yeah but why would you need to when the truck has full self driving? It’s even got cameras like eyeballs to control it! /s

phil_mckraken 2025-07-02 18:02

Cybertruck is the Robotaxi of Starships.

tallsmallboy44 2025-07-02 18:03

I'm aware the Maverick for 28k is the base fleet sales model, but even that model will have power windows and an infotainment/speaker system, cruise control etc. Without the tax credit the Slate of similar specs will cost more than the most basic Maverick, and I just don't see them selling enough to stay in business at the price point.

kombiwombi 2025-07-02 18:03

Yeah. Where are these 150 people every day coming from?

Hi_Im_Ken_Adams 2025-07-02 18:03

The douche-mobile.

AwkwardTouch2144 2025-07-02 18:06

Alternatively, how about just a big fire

Flimsy-Run-5589 2025-07-02 18:06

I wonder where they are hiding their development costs for this ‘thing’, a new model with factory and tooling, especially with such a unique concept, costs billions. If this factory then runs at such low utilisation it will cost a fortune. That must be extremely negative on the balance sheet, but I have the impression that Tesla is very ‘creative’ in this respect.

AwkwardTouch2144 2025-07-02 18:07

I remember someone saying you never see a girl riding in one. To date, it is always just a dude alone or with a friend. Male birth control these things are.

Brave_Quantity_5261 2025-07-02 18:12

Lot of other tooling required in the process aside from just making the panels. And it’s an entire new production line to make the cars, so any pre-existing tooling on said production line would need to be made from scratch (or purchased) It’s an entire new factory if I remember correctly so built from the ground up with all new equipment.

Ok_Addition_356 2025-07-02 18:13

What a major fuckup. I called it a few years ago... I literally said, "This will be Tesla's first flop" because I couldn't answer the question "Who is this for exactly?" And come up with enough of a section of the population that would make it feasible.

Minimum-Function1312 2025-07-02 18:16

😂😂😂

Ok_Addition_356 2025-07-02 18:17

Meme stocks are the only thing keeping the stock market alive rn IMO.

Proot65 2025-07-02 18:18

The real answer is all Range Rover up in the front and all pick up down in the back.

nopeynopenooope 2025-07-02 18:18

I would love to know the math on how many centuries of sales they will need to earn back the infrastructure investment on a present value basis

CornerGasBrent 2025-07-02 18:18

I think Cybertruck owners are concentrated in certain areas, like I see them in SoCal.

ElectricRing 2025-07-02 18:20

People are still buying cyber trucks? Lol

matt_remis 2025-07-02 18:20

What sucks is that there are aspects of the design that are great. One of these is the lower front end height compared to an F150 Lightning or Silverado EV. In my Lightning there is no way I will see a kid in front of me without the camera in front. But the issues outweigh the positive aspects.

[deleted] 2025-07-02 18:23

[removed]

Various_Mechanic_474 2025-07-02 18:23

5000 too many

[deleted] 2025-07-02 18:24

It's sub 10 micron! How much more do you need? /s

SuperRusso 2025-07-02 18:28

People years from now are going to marvel that it took so long for Tesla to go belly up

asdf2k7 2025-07-02 18:30

they need to hire some economists or something. how could they not see that demand for these dorky vehicles are going to wane?

MakionGarvinus 2025-07-02 18:35

Don't Yugo's kinda keep driving forever? Terrible car, but you can throw w/e at them?

Smartimess 2025-07-02 18:35

The problem of the CyberTruck is not only his price or image. It is simply not a truck, the unique engineering parts do not workreliable, it‘s incredible unsafe for other people and sometimes the passengers too and its battery has not enough capacity for its massive weight. We will see the battery technology for heavy duty and vanity trucks in 2030. The thing is a massive failure and only one man is to blame: Elon Musk.

syrvyx 2025-07-02 18:38

It's hard for me to not negatively judge the person driving one.

yugami 2025-07-02 18:39

6) sold 6x more than the cybertruck in an era of much lower sales volume

syrvyx 2025-07-02 18:40

Did you really believe it was going to meet those specs and price?

Fluffy-Salt8014 2025-07-02 18:42

What? There are other vehicles where you can’t see the front, and more where yo can only if you seat high. I’ve never heard of it being a problem since you drive mostly trusting on your spacial awareness, like when you park in parallel, when you drive in reverse, or when you do anything of the things you mention in a lot of cars.

syrvyx 2025-07-02 18:43

There are surprisingly quite a few in the Northern Virginia area.

Maximum-Objective-39 2025-07-02 18:45

IIRC - Didn't they actually make the Homer and it ruined his company?

gounatos 2025-07-02 18:48

Yeah i am all about hating the CT as being a stupid design that even a 6 year old would discard and start over, but that thing about the front of the thing doesn't track, i drive/drived only european and korean cars, no huge american monster trucks and it was always "my front is probably around there", couldn't really see it.

missvandy 2025-07-02 18:48

Hey now, the Homer was poorly designed but at least it was well constructed.

poet0463 2025-07-02 18:48

I really wonder who the hell those 5,000 people are?

followtharulez 2025-07-02 18:50

Edolf would have to pay me to take one. On the first repair I'd scrap it..... Still it would cost me $2000 to install a home charger... Nah, forget about it. Total trash.

Mammoth-Kangaroo1023 2025-07-02 18:50

They are a blight on socal ... See like 5+ a day on my commute lately

Mammoth-Kangaroo1023 2025-07-02 18:53

The Cyber truck *wishes* it was a Dacia Sandero.

jankenpoo 2025-07-02 18:55

With autopilot that actually works lol

jankenpoo 2025-07-02 18:56

That many that don’t “mind” driving “swasticars”

jankenpoo 2025-07-02 18:59

The Yugo gets dissed but for the time it was an extremely cheap car and some ran without problems for years. I had a buddy that found Campagnolo rims for it that originally cost more than the car lol It was a fun car to drive. Which I’m not sure you can say about the CT.

Spillz-2011 2025-07-02 19:01

Underperforming how? I immediately know the driver would be awful to talk to and probably has a micropenis. Isn’t that the main selling feature? Honestly if anything it’s over performing given musks accelerating levels of awfulness.

Maverlck 2025-07-02 19:04

Focus on Full SUV instead

mrweatherbeef 2025-07-02 19:06

They aimed for Massengill, but got Summer’s Eve

rsmiley77 2025-07-02 19:07

They assume they’ll sell around 20k this year based on first quarter numbers if around 5k sold. They won’t continue to sell 5k a quarter. Probably won’t sell 15k for the year.

[deleted] 2025-07-02 19:09

You talking about the cybertruck or doge savings?

bASSdude66 2025-07-02 19:09

Like the Baja 500

demonicbullet 2025-07-02 19:14

I have a suspicion a good portion of those 20k are businesses A further suspicion a good portion of those businesses are using it for advertising since it looks funky and car people talk about it a lot, in my area alone id estimate 10% of the cybertruck driving are just an advertisement for their business. Not going to lie, the shape works really well for plastering s good vinyl wrap on, get some good large flat sections you can take advantage of to not distort your image.

an_actual_T_rex 2025-07-02 19:14

Yeah the problem was more that it very infamously wasn’t an ideal car for crossing the Straight of Macinac.

[deleted] 2025-07-02 19:15

snatch vast oil profit telephone mountainous like attempt detail cow *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev/home)*

an_actual_T_rex 2025-07-02 19:16

Yeah. I live in a medium sized city in the Great Lakes and I’ve only seen 1 or 2 in the wild. You find cyber trucks where you find Silicon Valley Types (derogatory).

Intelligent-Rest-231 2025-07-02 19:16

Totaled ones that need to be replaced. I shocking number of these shitboxes have already met the junk yard crusher.

SurfSorcerer 2025-07-02 19:18

wow.

foersom 2025-07-02 19:19

Per quarter.

TheDeliManCan5 2025-07-02 19:21

I’m pretty sure they were making a joke based on how fElon gracefully highlighted how important the unobtainable tolerances at scale the side panels needed to be for him to be “satisfied”. Otherwise the rest of the vehicles prefect design would be hampered. From the headlights catching fresh snow to dampen those pesky photons, to its over abundant ability to provide the utility a truck is expected to provide its owner. Unrelated: I enjoyed the information you provided us :)

LightMission4937 2025-07-02 19:24

So 50 tops.

Disgod 2025-07-02 19:24

I imagine an unsurprisingly large number of diehards re-buying after their first was lemon lawed.

MarchMurky8649 2025-07-02 19:24

Are you sure? Any other vehicle design I can think of you can see the front. You might have to move your head to do so, but what other vehicle has a windscreen like that?

art-is-t 2025-07-02 19:25

Who the heck is still buying these ugly ass things ?

Patient_Access_9311 2025-07-02 19:25

But the full self-driving will be available only by the end of 2025 or early 2026.

SimpleSillyLife 2025-07-02 19:26

I’m surprised that they sell any of those actual pieces of shit.

foersom 2025-07-02 19:28

Yes it is good that it has a sloping front for visibility on the ground straight ahead. But the front side visibility is terrible because of the long sloping window frames and the enormous wiper standing vertical.

[deleted] 2025-07-02 19:32

Watch the stock rally tomorrow

[deleted] 2025-07-02 19:34

compare practice cats middle ad hoc follow selective fuzzy rob hurry *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev/home)*

Ok_Addition_356 2025-07-02 19:34

Holy shit I thought it was per month lmao

wraith_majestic 2025-07-02 19:35

Yeah but thats offset by: I would never do business with a company that would support musk/trump by buying a wankpanzer. Not sure it’s really the best advertising plan… I think keeping politics away from your business is generally the best idea.

mtnbike2 2025-07-02 19:37

Yeah 5k per quarter is absolutely effing terrible

Alien_Way 2025-07-02 19:37

As head of transportation under Biden, you would've had to pay me a whole lot more than that to agree to leaving deadly Musk trucks menacing children (everyone) on our roadways.

MathW 2025-07-02 19:40

They told investors they would sell 250k/year. I wonder if the company's internal projections were more realistic.

demonicbullet 2025-07-02 19:40

Fair but then you get into the intricacies of advertising that most people don't have the time or funding to figure out. How much of the population actually has a negative connotation of Tesla versus Elon, how many of them let that reflect on the owners? That is hard to estimate Then you have the fact that the deal on them is crazy right now they need to get them off the lot and the deals show it (drove through a Tesla lot last week, they are parking the cybertrucks as far away from each other as they can and they are still super common in the parking lot)

pzerr 2025-07-02 19:41

People suggested I was wrong when said they may be at 2000 a month. Likely closer to 1500 a month. They are closer to 1500 a month. There is no metric that can make this look good. That is a line that is loosing significant money.

MattGdr 2025-07-02 19:41

It’s absolutely insane that this is the case.

galaxyapp 2025-07-02 19:45

I think its a shitstain, but somewhere in my post history I really thought they'd do it... Tesla has had a back for building cars that 99% hate and 1% buy, and thats worked for years... Still half expecting this to turn around, but musk has pissed off both sides of his cult.

[deleted] 2025-07-02 19:46

Please get the shit truck off the market

MarchMurky8649 2025-07-02 19:49

Well I just had a look at a picture of it and I can see what you mean but the angles are very different, and the front is much closer to you so easier to estimate the position of. The weird thing about CT is how far the furthest part of the windscreen (wndshield) is, and combined with the angle it is, at least according to one reviewer's opinion, difficult to judge where the front of the thing is.

pzerr 2025-07-02 19:50

No they would not. Not with that design. For most truck owners, they want a truck. They do not need gadgets or fart sounding horns. They want strong suspension and proper brakes. They want towing that will not eventually crack and they want a box that you do not have to worry about scratching. And they want range. To be sure there are people that want something novel. But this truck would not be novel at all if it had high sales as you suggest. Every truck is identical and kind of boring identical and that does not allow an owner to feel unique. Yes they can put on an expensive wrap but that means they have to spend an extra 5000 dollars and save up about 1000 dollars each year to have it redone every 5. Mostly this truck appeals to the 8 to 30 age group. Of whom have little money to spend on gimmick items.

Red-FFFFFF-Blue 2025-07-02 19:53

Slate has cruise control. Power windows are an option. I would DIY that myself. Fixed my buddy’s Armada window no problem. Infotainment is over priced. You can get Android “head units” on Amazon for just over $100. Got an ATOTO for my Excursion, dual cameras, for $130. I used to build my own subwoofer boxes. Amps and speakers are easy peazy. I might just start up a company adding accessories for all the pansy non-DIY types that can’t even change their own car batteries. Once people start making accessories and 3D printed holders… sky is the limit.

pzerr 2025-07-02 19:53

Which is funny because the DeLorean also failed for the same reasons. Well I would say the DeLorean was not as ugly, fitting in with more of a sports car design, but it simply was an economic failure and did not meet up with the specs they envisioned. As you say, being a truck, who thought it would be a serious product?

dr_reverend 2025-07-02 19:54

Who are these people who are still buying this crap?

pzerr 2025-07-02 19:56

Generally, automakers are unlikely to maintain a production line with only 20,000 units sold per year. This is due to the high costs associated with maintaining a dedicated production line, including tooling, labor, and supply chain management. Unless the vehicle is highly profitable on a per-unit basis or serves a niche market where volume is not the primary driver of success, 20,000 units a year is likely too low to justify the expense. If Tesla keeps this open, it is for the perception they did not fuck up. They hide the sales and profits off these lines with other models that do not sell well.

Bobinss 2025-07-02 19:57

TSLA is hyping their AI as if they are going to crush Nvidia, Meta, Alphabet and Amazon at AI. Sucker born every minute. Elon is dancing as fast as he can.

pzerr 2025-07-02 19:58

That is a small part of it. You need to then get that piece delivered and mounted. They did go with glue but we are all now seeing how that is turning out.

LifeRound2 2025-07-02 20:01

Didn't Peon say he'd build 7 for every one he didn't sell? Simpletons like myself just can't understand his brilliance.

fossilnews 2025-07-02 20:01

Ha! I think doge barely hit 1%, but really the point of it was to stop Elon's investigations.

Bobinss 2025-07-02 20:02

To be fair, the non-EV Ford F-150, Chevy Silverado, Dodge Ram also has a problem with too high a hood to see what's in front of it. It's so bad, the NTSA is looking into it.

ComfortablePomelo589 2025-07-02 20:02

This post earned y’all a follow. Please post more about the Deplorean’s demise. Thanks!

Kruger_Smoothing 2025-07-02 20:05

The Ineos is pretty badass looking though.

matt_remis 2025-07-02 20:10

Good callout. I specified the EV models for a better comparison, but that’s good to mention. I love the large frunks… but it’s just stupid from a pedestrian safety standpoint and it needs to be fixed.

ad-astra-specta 2025-07-02 20:12

Well, according to Ripley, there's one of them born every minute.

ad-astra-specta 2025-07-02 20:14

Soon, they'll have to stack them. Over time, it'll be like a huge stainless steel compost heap.

hilldog4lyfe 2025-07-02 20:16

It’s truly one of the dumbest vehicles ever made

Tosh_00 2025-07-02 20:17

Same question, only the hardcore fans are left I guess ? I'd personally be so ashamed to be seen driving this thing.

entinenmies 2025-07-02 20:24

I call bullshit

friendIdiglove 2025-07-02 20:24

More like the Baja 5.

Mars8 2025-07-02 20:25

Stock to the moon though

Zorkmid123 2025-07-02 20:25

Thanks, I appriciate it!

Janky_Forklift 2025-07-02 20:35

Right and the DeLorean should have been a really key use case for CT. There were some major missed learnings. And as for the truck part lol idk man if it had super high utility I think it could have survived way better but as soon as I saw the production “truck bed” I was wondering why someone from Tesla didn’t wander over to literally any production pickup truck and take some notes.

L-WinthorpeIII 2025-07-02 20:35

Fred is full of shit yet again, Tesla didn’t confirm anything. Just his dumb ass guessing again.

sffunfun 2025-07-02 20:40

Does it matter what I believe? I also had a pre-order for a Tesla 3 and that started shipping many many years behind schedule.

phatelectribe 2025-07-02 20:47

Tell me about it. I own one lololol

ThoughtFormal8488 2025-07-02 20:50

The purpose of this car is bullying other drivers.

Mediocre_Tap_2351 2025-07-02 20:55

There are 10 cameras on this thing. There's one in the front....pretty sure.

Calm_Range_3279 2025-07-02 20:55

You can still see some on the road in the former yugoslavia

RuskiesInTheWarRoom 2025-07-02 20:57

It’s a limited collectors’ edition now!

Bubbagump210 2025-07-02 20:58

These are cast from a single piece of sheet metal accurate down to a single micron! That’s terribly difficult! /s Remember when Elmo was shilling that story?

Quirky_Tradition_806 2025-07-02 20:59

The surprising news is that there are 5,000 suckers who are untouched by Musk's disdain for ordinary folk

iontucky 2025-07-02 21:00

I would never do business with a company that bought it. If they have enough money to spend that much on a vehicle with no practical purpose, then they must really be overcharging their customers.

i_eat_pupusas 2025-07-02 21:01

Starting to think most of the sales are in my district. Not only am I seeing way more cybertrucks in my area but they're all driven by old white men with oakleys.

No_Measurement_3041 2025-07-02 21:01

The 2019 Cybertruck with a 40k price tag never actually existed, tho…

ZoomHigh 2025-07-02 21:05

Sale of \~5,000/quarter is about 10X what I would have guessed. Maybe that's why TSLA is up today, even though CT sales are down 90% from planned production. \[edit for clarity\]

SBR404 2025-07-02 21:08

John Bladerunner would never drive in a car as shitty as the cybertruck!

MarchMurky8649 2025-07-02 21:10

I guess everyone is different but think I'd prefer to just use my eyes, directly, to see what's going on rather than have to stop, look at a screen, then start prodding away at it until I have the right camera up, or whatever it entails. To be honest I don't really know. Perhaps if I drove one I'd find this aspect didn't bother me. It's just I was reading a review or some such article in which the author was driving one, either for the first time or after driving other vehicles for a while, I forget, and he described how the design meant he had to guess where the front was and I thought "yes, that must be irritating".

Cake-Patient 2025-07-02 21:10

Excellent news for drugged up Tesla’s investors! Stock price will go up tomorrow.

EducationTodayOz 2025-07-02 21:15

why would that be do you think. the cyberbeast is awesome at failing

EducationTodayOz 2025-07-02 21:16

I guarantee you elon has never owned a truck or done truck guy stuff

friendIdiglove 2025-07-02 21:18

He was planning to sell 250,000 of these things. ha ha ha ha ha ha 🤣 Like, even Toyota, who otherwise can do wrong it seems, has tried for 25 years only to sell 10% the number of full-size trucks that the big three sell combined. Leon Musk really bet big on a sure loss.

poet0463 2025-07-02 21:23

The old difficulty adjusting when reality doesn’t meet their beliefs. First one was a fluke but the next one will be perfect because they’ve made it better … lord Elon be praised …

demonicbullet 2025-07-02 21:24

If it's done well it's almost entirely a write-off, still impacts the business but alot of that is a deduction, so it's less than you would think, less than if the same boss went and picked out a sedan worth 50k This is without factoring in crazy ass deals on them at the moment if the business needed a vehicle anyways with similar capacity, a cybertruck isn't that much worse, if they were getting an advertising vehicle anyways, there may be better cost options, they are not going to be as efficient.

zzbear03 2025-07-02 21:31

Without all the flashy branding and echo chamber thinking, somebody (maybe everybody but 5,000 people every Quarter) realizes how ugly and dysfunctional the CT is compared to real trucks from competitors lol

DumpTrumpGrump 2025-07-02 21:39

If it was $45-50K with self-driving + didn't have Musk affiliation, it'd pretty much be the perfect vehicle for field sales reps and they'd sell plenty especially given some of the current tax incentives for big trucks. But since they'd rather have thousands sitting in mall parking lots instead of dropping the price where they'd make sense as biz vehicles (where the ugliness would get dissipated by a branded vehicle wrap) they'd rather doom the whole product line. I wouldn't want one for personal use. But for biz usage the reduced gas and maintenance costs would make it more viable.

SteveDougson 2025-07-02 21:42

Sad for Tesla but at least they'll be able to make up for it with their line of Semi trucks

DumpTrumpGrump 2025-07-02 21:45

I agree that they are an excellent marketing platform (much better than most trucks given they stand out and have lots of flat surfaces). And also agree it would be better without the Musk affiliation. But they aren't exactly offering exceptional deals on them yet. I looked into it as a biz purchase because I thought they'd have come down a lot further by now than tehy have. I assume there must be some massive tax break they will get for destroying the vehicles rather then selling them cheap.

SouSy 2025-07-02 21:51

I love the sentiment but way too much pollution. I suppose if we take the batteries out of all of them that would lessen the pollution significantly. Coincidentally I could use a shitload of batteries for home storage...

Super-Base- 2025-07-02 21:54

5000 units per quarter is in line for volume for a car in this price class.

Brokenandburnt 2025-07-02 21:56

I'm unsure why anyone would want to own a car that locks you in when it catches on fire.

ephix 2025-07-02 21:58

Your country has 200m people

beesnax 2025-07-02 21:59

Agreed, if it had the same features as the F-150 lightning and actually worked…this probably would have actually been competitive

Sigynde 2025-07-02 22:01

They shut down the manufacturing line of them recently, claiming that they were just going to take a week to do repairs on the facility. Anyone have an update on that? Did they continue production?

Pugs-r-cool 2025-07-02 22:02

And I don't even think it's one bit of steel like they promised, it's mostly steel panels stuck onto plastic and glued together.

dead_ed 2025-07-02 22:06

It's ugly but it had some potential when the backend was going to be open to the cabin and be air conditioned, which would have been good for light camping, but that obviously didn't happen - along with a thousand other selling points.

Pugs-r-cool 2025-07-02 22:06

If it's a refundable deposit why not, especially back in 2019. If it turned out good then great, you were first in line to an amazing vehicle, if it ended up being awful (and it did), you get your money back and you don't lose anything. Even if they had a small probability of meeting their promises it was worth a shot.

AgentSmith187 2025-07-02 22:13

He just fires the entire team when someone even suggests no so he filters out anyone who might say no.

Global_Suggestion345 2025-07-02 22:33

I’ll buy one for $40k if you want

syrvyx 2025-07-02 22:43

I felt it was clear it wasn't going to meet expectations from day 1.

syrvyx 2025-07-02 22:45

It was pretty clear his specs were completely made up.  I couldn't tell if you were a flipper or credlous and was a bit curious.

kason 2025-07-02 22:52

For real. I signed up to buy one. I even like the stupid design. But since then, we've learned a lot about Elon. And the thing seems quite poorly built. So I cancelled.

11I1I1 2025-07-02 22:52

I wonder if they count replacement of hopelessly broken ones as a "delivery". Additionally, a manufacturer of those sunglasses racists wear should probably buy the data for every CT customer. 1000% Conversion rate on tap and they're just ignoring it.

friendIdiglove 2025-07-02 22:59

Yes. “Introducing the Homer. A car built for Homer.”

high_everyone 2025-07-02 23:01

There are far too many around me. I see one every time I leave the house it seems.

Pugs-r-cool 2025-07-02 23:15

It’s easy to say that with hindsight. I thought it was unlikely, but not impossible that they’d met them, but either way we’re talking about a refundable deposit. It’s worth the chance to put down the deposit sometimes, if it ended up not meeting expectations (and it most certainly didn’t), you get all your money back and you don’t lose out on anything.

[deleted] 2025-07-02 23:17

[deleted]

Rabble_Runt 2025-07-02 23:23

They actually had to buy back Kyle from Out Of Spec’s Cybertruck because it had so many issues. He was one of its biggest fans but it didn’t seem like he wanted another one since some of the issues aren’t repairable due to bad design.

supoxblade 2025-07-02 23:31

Tesla makes up 1%-2% of the S&P500. Anyone “conservatively” buying that index fund is participating in this, unfortunately.

Vanman04 2025-07-03 00:18

You know since Elon took over Tesla I think this is the only thing that was actually his idea.oh that and the tunnel nonsense. Have any of his ideas actually panned out or does he just get rich off others accomplishments?

MarchMurky8649 2025-07-03 00:22

I think the angle of the windscreen in a minivan is generally less severe and, if you raise your head and move it closer to the glass I expect you can see the front. Also I think the problem with CT is exacerbated by how far away the bottom of the windscreen is. Clearly, though, I was foolish to say "Any other vehicle" there. I did most of my driving decades ago and, back then, I think what I said may have been true, but it might not have been \[note to self: must be more careful!\]

chrismamo1 2025-07-03 00:49

Imo they're actually way less ugly in person. Still ugly as shit, but there's a certain cool factor.

chrismamo1 2025-07-03 00:52

The market is basically people who - want an impractically large truck - rarely haul or tow anything - don't think electric cars are gay - aren't turned off by Elon Musk's politics - have $60k to burn half of these are mutually exclusive

stupid_cat_face 2025-07-03 01:08

Homer's car horn played La Coocaracha! Way better.

__slamallama__ 2025-07-03 01:15

Honestly advertising is weird. 80% of the battle is getting your name in someone's head. I'd never support a business I remembered seeing on a cybertruck... But I am sure that if they were a Google result and I was choosing that one would seem familiar and I'd favor them. No way I'd remember specifically where it was from.

sffunfun 2025-07-03 01:38

LMAO. OK. Good for you.

deepstate_chopra 2025-07-03 02:00

Alexa, play *Man on the Silver Mountain*

homoiconic 2025-07-03 02:11

According to Wikipedia... > Ford announced the end of the Edsel program on November 19, 1959. Production continued until late in November, with 2,846 model year 1960 cars produced. Total Edsel sales were approximately 116,000, less than half the company's projected break-even point. 116,000 models over three model years is about 40,000 a year. So Cybertruck is "only" twice Edsel's failure in units sold. And we are not mentioning that the US market was about half what it is today, and that Edsel launched just as a major recession got underway, and it's way easier to finance vehicles today than it was in 1958-1960.

Prestigious_Yak8551 2025-07-03 02:15

I would rather buy a used unwashed tongue scraper than this monstrosity.

Ill-Running1986 2025-07-03 02:16

It had rack and peanut steering!

SouSy 2025-07-03 02:25

To own the libs, or something. I don't know, it's hard to keep track of these idiots anymore.

[deleted] 2025-07-03 02:41

Rack and peanut steering.

I-Have-No-King 2025-07-03 02:44

Not yet

[deleted] 2025-07-03 02:45

Just a smidge lower than his claim he’d sell 250k per year

I-Have-No-King 2025-07-03 02:46

No it’s not. Should be double. See BMW 7 series and Mercedes S500 sold 10k+ units each priced over $100k last year. This took me about 10 seconds, I’m sure there is more data out there.

Chokedee-bp 2025-07-03 02:48

Tesla sales down, so Tesla stock up tomorrow 🤔 It never fails, no matter how bad the news Tesla stock up for life .

New_Reputation5222 2025-07-03 02:51

And no, I promise I haven't said the same thing every year since 2018.

Super-Base- 2025-07-03 03:08

That’s 10k units for the year for the 7 series, this is 5000 units per quarter for the cybertruck, or 20,000 units per year.

Jsizzle19 2025-07-03 03:09

Dude!! I thought I was the only person who thought this lol

BildoWarrior 2025-07-03 03:18

Do you want to meet at the Walmart parking lot, or should I mail it to you?

nexusx86 2025-07-03 03:36

Draw is kind of accurate since it's HIGHLY UNSAFE to tow anything making it not really a truck but a faux truck. See Jerry Rig everything videos about the cast aluminum bumper fiasco when every other truck uses cast steel and won't rip apart when towing.

nexusx86 2025-07-03 03:39

In a tiny bit of fairness the Nazi and fascist Trump supporting stuff hadn't come out at the time the cyber truck was announced and a lot of liberal tree hugging types still supported him.. Now everyone wants to see him loose. Liberals hate him for supporting trump and maga thinks he has TDS after he said Trump is on the Epstein docs. No one left to support his companies including Europe since he tried and failed to twist the German elections. Big losses there as they move towards BYD.

SentinelZero 2025-07-03 03:42

\- Elon, age 54

SentinelZero 2025-07-03 03:45

Like disassemble itself while driving! And break down if taken through carwashes!

dibsies 2025-07-03 03:50

Welp, time to dust themselves off and try again. Ideally, with a less retarded CEO at the helm.

Lacrewpandora 2025-07-03 04:02

For your enjoyment, Technoking runs over a Valet sign becasue he can't see out his Incel Camino: [https://youtu.be/AjPBS7VxDQ0?t=36](https://youtu.be/AjPBS7VxDQ0?t=36)

lotus604 2025-07-03 04:05

Kudos to Tesla’s sales team! They found 5k suckers

wlowry77 2025-07-03 04:47

Be fair, that’s a general American truck problem!

[deleted] 2025-07-03 05:18

[deleted]

[deleted] 2025-07-03 05:35

[deleted]

hegenious 2025-07-03 06:00

They still managed to find 5000 suckers ready to buy this contraption? An amazing achievement in itself.

CovfefeFan 2025-07-03 06:00

The few, the dumb.

hegenious 2025-07-03 06:03

2017

SakaWreath 2025-07-03 06:11

JFC Timmy that’s the ugliest pile of crap I’ve ever seen. *Aren’t you going to put it on the fridge mommy?* Oh gawd no. Don’t ever bring me another drawing. If a Crayon ever comes within 50ft of you, just run away screaming.

ConkerPrime 2025-07-03 06:28

Tesla investors on reading this: “This is a great time to invest. Proves they are not a car company like Musk said all along!”

relentlessoldman 2025-07-03 06:59

I'm amazed there are still that many people that want to buy this dumb thing.

Odd-Adagio7080 2025-07-03 07:34

The Homer! What was it? “The elegance of a gazelle, but powerful like a gorilla!”

Odd-Adagio7080 2025-07-03 07:35

“GAAAGGGHHH!!! What does this monstrosity cost?!?!? I’m ruined! RUINED!!!!!”

Odd-Adagio7080 2025-07-03 07:37

You don’t need to see the zombies you run over post-apocalypse.

Emotional_Goal9525 2025-07-03 07:55

They get totaled faster than sold.

Big-Bike530 2025-07-03 08:59

He actually was less optimistic, at least at first, saying it might not take off and they'd have to make a more normal truck after all.  But also at the time sales were booming of all other Teslas and one flop wouldn't have hurt.

Big-Bike530 2025-07-03 09:01

That would actually be true, had they not removed the ultrasonic sensors and now rely on cameras to see what they too cannot see.  The ultrasonics would warn you like they did on older Teslas and like they do in nearly every other modern car now.  Instead he said "hey everyone loved us removing rain sensors, let's do that again!"

Big-Bike530 2025-07-03 09:04

Low enough to not care had Elon shut the fuck up and not cratered sales of all other Teslas, high enough that now it does hurt.

Heklin0891 2025-07-03 09:08

lol. Just lol.

NewWarthog9123 2025-07-03 10:02

F150 pickup truck has about 750000 unit sales per year. The Cybertruck was meant to make vehicles like F150 and Dodge Ram obsolete.

MarchMurky8649 2025-07-03 10:27

Most, perhaps all, other trucks, you can draw a straight line from somewhere on the outside of the vehicle, very near or at the very front, through the windshield and into the body of the vehicle. Granted, sometimes you might have to move your head up and or closer to the glass to see it, but nothing else I know of makes it so impossible like this.

ConfoundingVariables 2025-07-03 10:32

It will not.

CRXCRZ 2025-07-03 12:03

The best year for the Pontiac Aztec was 28,000. The CT is only still around to save face.

[deleted] 2025-07-03 12:10

U know then it means Tesla stocks going up tomorrow

followtharulez 2025-07-03 12:27

I have no time to tinker

Patient_Access_9311 2025-07-03 13:10

Then it will be by the end of 2026 or early 2027, and so on.

nik_h_75 2025-07-03 13:15

but he came back and made a fortune on the baby translator (based on living with homer and observing Maggie)

jmcomms 2025-07-03 14:24

And Elon will come back by moving us all to Mars... ...oh, wait.

valenciansun 2025-07-03 14:24

They're endemic to Orange County CA 😭

PlanetCosmoX 2025-07-03 14:28

Those things aren’t trucks, they’re large batteries on wheels. With the 120kW capacity that’s enough to run a house for more than a week if you manage the power right. If you have solar, then it’s even better. He should have made the wheels retractable and the chassis more square like to allow vertical stacking. =p

high-up-in-the-trees 2025-07-03 14:53

This monstrosity cost eighty two THOUSAND dollars?! Inflation pegs that as 180k now so not as bad as the cubertruck but still, 120k was insane and I'm shocked tens of thousands of idiots paid that much for something they'll be shutting down production of soon. Updates/repairs/parts will end at some point too

high-up-in-the-trees 2025-07-03 15:01

>His numerous SpaceX test launches are failing at a rapid pace. This is likely to have been at the demand of an increasingly impatient Musk. The way they're doing it now is idiotic. Essentially the production line mentality of Tesla, with a number of different 'models' tested in blocks by type, all being made at the same time to get explosions faster for different reasons every time. Literally throwing shit at the wall to see what sticks. You can do that in coding, so long as you document everything (Elon doesn't know how to use github lol). It does not translate to aerospace whatsoever. That's how you know it was his idea

high-up-in-the-trees 2025-07-03 15:08

Yeah, the supposed exoskeleton was given as the entire reason it had to be shaped like it was. Quelle surprise, it turned out to be FAR too difficult and costly so the concept was junked. Possibly even before that ridiculous presentation, I wouldn't be surprised at all, knowing him And like,  there's nothing wrong with body on frame, but it's classic Elon to make up some unrealistic and unattainable bullshit to woo the cult, like if PT Barnum ran an MLM

heretorobwallst 2025-07-03 15:20

5000 is a lie too

americansherlock201 2025-07-03 15:29

But did they say which year they were using? Cause a year on Jupiter is nearly 12 earth years and their current pace keeps them within the 250k units sold in a Jupiter year!

ManifestDestinysChld 2025-07-03 15:32

LOL! "I've always spoken in Tesla Years, which are defined by the sidereal orbital period of the Roadster I shot into Mars orbit," Musk said, testily shouting down listeners who were quick to point out that Musk did not in fact launch a Tesla Roadster into Mars orbit. "I'm surprised you guys didn't know that, actually" Musk added unnecessarily.

failinglikefalling 2025-07-03 15:52

Slate sent me a drawing of a truck yesterday actually!

Sea_Abbreviations334 2025-07-03 16:31

I was expecting it to be three centuries but turns out it’s only two—time to buy the stonk!

BrewsandBass 2025-07-03 16:47

They were able to sell five thousand.

SpudsRacer 2025-07-03 18:17

The question now is how long they'll carry this thing as part of their lineup. There's no saving it now and the line should be shut down ASAP from a purely business standpoint. How long will they lose money on it to keep Elon from being too butthurt? 🍿🍿

Ragnarok-9999 2025-07-03 19:02

When will Tesla king accepts failure and shutdown the this shit ?

ITotallyGetThat 2025-07-03 23:12

while out walking today, saw one driving down the road. made sure to do my part and stopped and pointed at it and laughed

gordonmcdowell 2025-07-04 01:10

If someone gave me a cyber truck, there was nothing I could actually do with it other than sell it. It would have no practical use for me. There is no way I could store it or charge it. I’m pretty sure I would not enjoy parking it. To be fair, there are all sorts of trucks. I would also not have any use for. All sorts of sports car I would have not have practical use for. But I look at those and I think I could understand why someone would want one, at least.

IntelDeepInside 2025-07-04 02:01

As a Cybertruck owner I hope they stop making it. I want it to stay a rare car

Spiritual-Bath-666 2025-07-04 07:04

Gifts are tax-free in America (for the recipient)

CBC78 2025-07-04 11:24

Dodge Intrepids with the Cab Forward design were the same way. Most of the engine was actually under the dash.

Ok_Horror_3940 2025-07-04 12:36

Tesla cyber truck sales are down to 5000 giveaways

Buffalo-Trace 2025-07-04 13:31

Have a client that did that. And was considering getting more. I told him to get the hummer it’s bigger and sits higher. They were basically the same price.

Buffalo-Trace 2025-07-04 13:34

At 5k sales a quarter run rate. They have a 6 quarter backlog of inventory.

TheInternetsLOL 2025-07-04 14:52

Much flop, such wow. 🤯

dokujaryu 2025-07-04 17:48

If that’s the case I’m fairly certain at least half of them are in Orange County. I can’t drive anywhere without seeing one.

DietOfKerbango 2025-07-04 20:06

Gifts are absolutely taxable. The IRS considers the fair market value of non-cash prizes (like cars or trips as taxable income. In the case of winning a contest, the recipient is the one who pays the tax.

Spiritual-Bath-666 2025-07-04 20:22

Winning a contest is not considered a gift and is taxable. Gifts are not taxable to recipients. Are you banned in ChatGPT or something?

DietOfKerbango 2025-07-04 20:38

The hypothetical in my OP mentioned “contest” so that’s what was on my mind. You are right about the recipient of a cash gift not being taxed. donor is taxed.

Spiritual-Bath-666 2025-07-04 20:46

Sorry for lashing out. Peace!

whoevenkn0wz 2025-07-05 02:13

Wait, so it’s selling more trucks than any other company of a single model? 5000 is, the most? But less than they projected?

[deleted] 2025-07-05 02:29

Basically a look I’m an idiot mobile I like it for ads

davus_maximus 2025-07-05 14:51

And bullying governments across the world into watering down their vehicle safety standards. Luckily, so far they've failed.

davus_maximus 2025-07-05 14:53

The same sort of morons who crash into parked cars and lampposts and scream that they "shouldn't have been there".

demonicbullet 2025-07-05 16:13

Fuck Ive forgotten all about hummer, wonder what they are up to nowadays, will have to surf their website. He still got the tax deduction for over 6k lbs and cargo space then too huh? Way better idea there sir, good advice.

QuintsHat1975 2025-07-06 01:07

At the shock of literally nobody

paolilion 2025-07-06 05:05

I'd be surprised if it was expected to sell more than a few thousand a year - it's clearly a novelty car

Maximum-Objective-39 2025-07-06 06:16

We do seem to be the Cybertrucks natural habitat. Enough 'techy' right wingers looking for a penis augmentation and a permissive climate that is at least less likely to cause the thing to spontaneously commit sudoku.

Maximum-Objective-39 2025-07-06 06:18

To be fair, there are a LOT of Americans who buy 'pavement princesses' - i.e. trucks that aren't so much meant for work as to project the image of a rugged manly man. Of course the Cybertruck fails to even project the image.

Maximum-Objective-39 2025-07-06 06:19

Well friend, I might judge you on your tastes but never on your judge of character.

Reasonable_Head3088 2025-07-07 02:18

People driving cyber trucks look like complete. Idiots while they’re doing it. I just don’t understand. I’d rather have a Porsche.

pzerr 2025-07-07 15:58

Not sure I fully agree with that. Ya for sure. But the majority of people I see with a truck (outside of business) use it once or twice a month for some project or cleanup or some purpose where are car will not work. And that is not a pavement princess. I think what a lot of people see is that the other 95% of the time they drive it, it is not for truck purpose. That does not make it a pavement princess. Just means they understandably do not want to buy a second vehicle for the times they do not need truck things.

ScotchCigarsEspresso 2025-07-08 02:03

What!? Shocking. I cannot believe a $100k dumpster on wheels doesn't have mass appeal. Wierd. No one could have seen this coming. No one.

[deleted] 2025-07-09 13:01

I was at an event this weekend, a ribfest actually, and Tesla had like 10 Cybertrucks doing demos... most were just sitting in the lot not demo'ing... they must have spent a fortune to be there... all I could focus on where the insane dirty finger prints on the "trucks", the utterly terrible looks and the honest lack of interest frim anyone who wasn't a child. I parked my Sierra Denali beside one and it was obvious which one looked better

Lucker_Noob 2025-07-20 01:40

I'd be terrified to ride in this thing due it looking like the door or trunk will slice my fingers off. Hard pass, especially at $100k.

Add comment

Login is required to comment.

Login with Google