**I am a bot. This is a friendly reminder that unwelcoming toxic/griefing/pessimistic sniping comments that are not on topic and don’t move the discussion forward will be removed. A ban will be issued if necessary. Consider this before commenting. Report posts or comments that violate the [Rules](https://www.reddit.com/mod/teslamotors/rules/). Thank you.** If you are unable to find it, use the link to it. We are not a support sub, please make sure to use the proper resources if you have questions: [Official Tesla Support](https://www.tesla.com/support), [r/TeslaLounge](https://www.reddit.com/r/TeslaLounge/) personal content | [Discord Live Chat](https://discord.gg/tesla) for anything. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/teslamotors) if you have any questions or concerns.*
Sale is a sale
The headline is misleading, the air force wants to test weapons against them to see how they react to various weapons in case they are used by enemies in the future like the Toyota trucks. Considering battery materials, etc, knowing what happens when they blow up in large numbers would be useful. And wouldn’t be particularly a large number of trucks that would be put to that purpose. Especially if you need to have them moving for some of the tests without a driver
So… target practice?
Yep.
Gotta move those things by hook or by crook. They’re not going to move themselves
Sure, but specifically destructive testing for threat analysis of CT. The headline misses that nuance and will leave some thinking they just want to shoot at some trucks and chose CT for...reasons. Simple target practice implies practicing your aiming and firing of a weapon. That's not the intent here. The intent in this case deals with the CT specifically, not the weapon operator.
What terrorist in the right mind would swap a Hilux, the workhorse, the indestructible, the epitome of gorilla mobility for a Cybertruck?
so good even the army wants it
The goal isn't "target" practice. The goal is destructive testing. Like when you bend a product beyond it's limit is not "fun at factory", it's stress testing.
Finally found something it's good at!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Las_Vegas_Cybertruck_explosion A Cybertruck has already been used in a terrorist attack. I also don't know why you're expecting a terrorist to behave rationally, but Cybertruck are electric cars and therefore, their fires are very difficult to put out out. They're pretty valuable for terrorist attacks. Yeah they're expensive, but terrorists can you know, steal.
[deleted]
Which would never happen because why would they replace a cheap vehicle with an expensive one that requires expensive infrastructure to recharge. Imagine how stupid it would be using a gas generator for 24 hours to recharge a cybertruck. Maybe bombing just 1 to see how much damage it would do to people around it. But even then. Don’t need more than 1.
One in CA that doesn't have access to a Hilux
The headline is misleading. The US government is buying them as a way to repay financially the man who put them in power.
Why do you say that friend?
Why are you envisioning terrorists as only living in caves surrounded by sand with no infrastructure?
Gorilla -> Guerrilla
They're planning on testing 33 different types of vehicles, one of which is the cybertruck.
A news article with a misleading title that makes Tesla look bad? What a surprise s\
Wow and the company still gets their money so I think Tesla still wins here lmao
Gorilla
No it is perfect to move gorillas around
Understandable, have a nice day
Bullish.
The article says they're only buying 2...
Because they didn't read the article.
The guy that bombed the Trump Hotel in Las Vegas at the beginning of the year.
But couldn’t they buy a cheaper, used Tesla to figure this out? Or buy the battery and figure this out.
You’re trying to be a smart a** but failed. Target practice is for marksmanship and what’s being evaluated is the shooter and the firearm. This is vulnerability assessment where they want to see how the car reacts to various impact points, how much penetration there is by caliber, etc. They do that for many vehicles and all factory-armored cars like the Volvo XC60 and XC90. The CyberTruck has some bullet resistant featured and the Air Force wants to see what works and what doesn’t when they want to attack one for real. So no, not target practice at all. Try harder
Terrorists don’t usually place a large purchase order with a manufacturer :) They steal what is available after they conquer territory. This is how ISIS came into possession of so many trucks. Tesla is seen as a mid-luxury brand in Arab countries and Tesla posted an increase in sales within the Golf Cooperation Council countries. That’s, upper middle class Arabs are buying Cybertrucks. Since the Top 10 terrorists organizations in the world are currently Islamist terrorists, there’s a high chance we will see cybertrucks used by terrorists soon.
Elon can just remote disable the vehicle - much easier
They said the batteries were going to be removed, but yeah your scenario totally makes sense. I mean, unless you factor in that Toyota trucks are more reliable simple machines than Cybertrucks, hence their adoption in war zones. Good on the Air Force to admit we will be stuck in pointless wars in the Middle East until the death spiral of this country reaches fruition!
That sounds like woke ass science shit, are you sure Don the Con approved this?
If there's code in the software that lets him do that remotely. *And* if the people using it didn't just take out the cellular modem, which they obviously would if they're worried about something like that.
Destroying trucks, no matter how armored, is easy for the airforce. They need this test because it's much harder to be sure the occupants inside the armored car are hit while reducing collateral damage in cases when the truck is passing through a city full of civilians.
Because if the military is fighting you it’s a war zone and electricity will be cut.
2. They're buying 2.
Agreed, They look bad without misleading headlines, people should just be straightforward in reporting.
Yep! And none are for practicing targeting, all are for analyzing how those vehicles respond to various munitions.
They don’t blow up like gas tanks might, it’s a battery pack
Can get cheaper targets.
Kuwait uses a fleet of CTs that they power with large diesel generators carried on flatbed trailers. Because they are bulletproof, all computer, and very easy to work on mechanically. Every military will want them, probably the plan since day one. Everyone agrees it is the best plan
Yuk yuk yuk...(yawn)
In what universe are our enemies buying bulk cyber trucks? They barely sell domestically.
Just a way of funneling money to Elon.
They aren't allowed in Israel because they qualify as "armored vehicles" so...
at last! a use for cybertrucks
It’s pretty much what it is
It's easier to lay out a set of solar panels in a base than it is to protect a fuel convoy or a pipeline.
You aren’t charging a cybertruck with solar panels. People always over estimate solar panels by so much which is why it’s so easy to scam with them. A decently sized solar panel can barely charge a cell phone. Here is ChatGPT’s answer: “Charging a Cybertruck with solar panels takes a very long time, with estimations ranging from days to months or even longer, depending on the solar panel setup, battery size, and sunlight availability. While solar panels can provide a trickle charge and extend the truck's range, they are not a practical way to fully and quickly charge the large Cybertruck battery from empty. A solar setup for this purpose would require a massive and expensive array of high-wattage panels, potentially hundreds of panels covering a very large area” Months… for 1 charge lol or a whole solar farm for 1 truck.
I don't need you to cite ChatGPT. I charge my model 3 with a fairly small solar roof. It can charge 0-100 in 3 days. I'm thinking of a military base that's decently sized, say laying out 50 kW+ solar panels on the ground in one corner of the base, or as scaffolding above for shade.
Uhh that’s my point. Cybertruck has a 50% larger battery. Imagine taking 5 days to use a car - for an entire roof worth of solar panels. For what? To replace a simple gas powered truck? Im not saying it’s not impossible, im saying it’s entirely impractical.
I said a small roof. Like, 1/1000th of the size of a small base. it's not about replacing. It (and EV humvees) can be used for short range reconnaissance operations where onboard electricity is valuable and situations where electric's greater torque is advantageous. It can also be a battery backup for base power. The military is already exploring this with GM
I'm all for any cybertruck getting blown up
*the army wants to blow it up
Article should be us Air Force to bail out Tesla cybertruck product line after cratering sales.
>The headline is misleading, the air force wants to test weapons against them to see how they react to various weapons in case they are used by enemies in the future like the Toyota trucks. Seems dumb given how unpopular and low volume the CyberCuck is.
Cool they should offer 30k a piece
I "pity da fool" who stops reading past headlines. Their lives must really be depressing.
When did this become about the military fighting you? Have you never heard of a car bomb?
A news article for them buying 2 cybertrucks. Lol
> You aren’t charging a cybertruck with solar panels. > > Why not? Let this be a great lesson to you about not relying on ChatGPT. I produced 84 kWh yesterday with my rooftop solar panels, which are only on the roof of my garage and not angled/optimized for peak production. That's 2/3 of the battery of a Cybertruck. So yeah, you don't know what you're talking about, and neither does ChatGPT.
They'll buy a used one, if its in 100% structural shape. They don't need a new one.
They could use generators in push. It's no like tthe military couldn't have a few 500kw chargers with a mega pack on a trailer like Tesla does for emergencies . Or a portable like the one out of spec it testing.
I think they might resemble the same grade of armour of some of those makeshift armoured vehicles used in the Middle East. Probably flood damaged vehicles or something.
In a day man. 2/3rds the power to charge a cybertruck in a day. You can’t scale out an entire solar array to charge less than 1 truck a day. I mean you can but why the hell would you. How is this a good idea. There is a massive difference between possible and practical. Militaries run on practical and simple. What you’re describing is expensive and impractical for military or even commercial use. It’s totally fine for civilian use at home and even then you have grid power as an option if it’s not sunny or whatever. Yes you can create an entire solar farm - and I guess batteries to charge at night in order to support your fleet of 20 vehicles or whatever. Even Tesla super charging stations literally run off the grid - because you know… it’s not feasible to run on solar. Or just use gas like everyone else.
I would enlist if this happens
Elmobiles are absouloutely dog shite.
> In a day man. 2/3rds the power to charge a cybertruck in a day. And you said it would take months, hence my commenting.
Except the one in las Vegas contained the explosion. The Cybertruck was not ideal use for shrapnel in that case.
They are second for EV trucks. First last year.
They are buying 2, without batteries.
Like I said why try to rationalize the actions or an irrational person. If they're using it that's all that matters.
I don't blame them. EVs produce less heat signature and their visual signature is different (a fancy way of saying they don't look like other trucks). If the rumor mill started saying that CTs were some sort of stealth vehicle small countries would buy them in droves.
Good luck stealing a Tesla.
Assuming they get the password from the owner.
Imagine how stupid it would be to ferry thousands of gallons of fuel into a hot LZ when there’s power on site.
I charge my car with solar every day.
Of course you can charge your car from solar if you have a roof top solar installation and a wall charger. For a single car - at your home with a grid backup and a 20k solar installation. Sure why not. Probably will pay for itself in 15 years. I’m saying it’s not practical at scale or reliable enough for commercial let alone military use. You’d need a literal solar farm to charge a fleet of cars. This is why everyone falls for solar scams. Why don’t we just put solar panels on the side of all the highways! Why don’t we just put solar panels in the road! Or on bus stops! Or turn skyscraper windows into solar panels! It’s genius. Because the cost, maintenance, space, reliability, etc don’t make economic sense at scale. There is a reason that portalable solar panels can barely charge a cell phone a few percent an hour. Yes you can buy one. Yes they exist. No they aren’t practical. But a solar powered calculator is nice. The point isn’t that you can’t - of course you can charge your car or power a home on solar panels. But if you’re going to power 100 homes or charge 100 cars you’ll need a lot more infrastructure and it’s more economical to consolidate that infrastructure in some type of I dunno - power grid.
What a waste of money.
Im no expert but I don’t think any form of military or terrorist Organisation will ever consider this thing over a reliable and practically indestructible Toyota pickup this is just the airforce blowing shit up for fun and not to be prepared if an enemy uses it. (Which they won’t, because of what I said above and also why would they buy a connected car produced by their enemy, which can be and probably is being tracked 24/7 by Tesla)
Login is required to comment.
Login with Google