How would you actually weight all 7 Mag 7 stocks if you had to pick exact percentages?

Put the fries in the bag

6.9420% for tesla because tesla

hahaha

Have you ever heard of a ETF

Alphabet peg ratio is not .76 my boy idk where you got your info google peg is closer to a 1.5-1.8 meta is the cheapest in mag 7 by far

Yeah, but why not create my own?

ETF mags

Googl should be higher. Extremely undervalued compared to peers

Interesting weights. Some people will cut AAPL down to 8, it's the most mature of the 7 with the least AI upside near term. Take that and add it to NVDA. TSLA at 2 feels right, more of a sentiment stock than a fundamentals play at this point.

Googl 88% rest 12% Tsla 0%

Google - 30% Amazon - 25% Nvidia - 15% Microsoft - 15% Apple - 10% Tesla - 5% Meta - 0%

Maybe a year ago. CAPEX is high FCF lower. Not at all like how it was before where they were the only Mag7 not burning cash but now they're spending to catch up.

yeah that's trailing PEG from last year's 37% earnings growth, not forward. forward is definitely higher. meta probably is cheaper on a growth adjusted basis you're right. would you flip the two?

Microsoft shit af

Because with an ETF you don't have to worry about rebalancing

Tesla over Meta? Really?

Actually, this is quite interesting to me, particularly since it caused me to look at my 3 Fidelity accounts, where I have a total of $2.2 million, albeit, approximately $500k is managed by a Fidelity Team\* (they call it "Fidelity U.S. Large Cap Strategy"). Specifically, I was wondering about the %s in this managed account. It should also be noted that I own 2500 shares of NVDA in my regular Fidelity account, along with a 1000 AMZN shares, and 1100 shares of AVGO (which just joined the "trillion" dollar club a month or so ago). Anyway, I highlighted the "% Of Account" column and of the approximately 150 stocks/ETF this Fidelity Team has me in, VOO is the highest at 9.96%; NVDA 7.83%; AMZN 4.56%; MSFT 4.13%; GOOGL 3.32%; META 2.73%; AAPL 2.40%; and, TSLA .30% (note: AVGO 2.58% and XOM 2.56% were ahead of AAPL and TSLA). \*Minimum investment of $100k required for an account with this Fidelity Team.

100% TSLA (short), 0% rest

that's interesting, nvda on top and tsla basically nothing lines up with what i landed on too. how do you feel about them having amzn above msft? that's the opposite of what i went with. also 2500 shares of nvda is wild lol

GOOG>AMZN>AAPL>NVDA>MSFT. META is being stupid with money. TSLA is kinda falling behind in the EV market. MSFT is being stupid with decissions but their OS releases are always 1 version sh-t 1 version actually good. 10 was good, so 11 had to be sh-t, 12 will be good. Since everything is relatively expensive I'll just base it on the ammount of least stupid decissions and user or customer retention.

Why Apple over Nvidia?

Not as exposed in case AI is a bubble. Still involved on the AI side on the neuromorphic R&D side. Way more efficient than the current architecture if someone makes it work properly. Iphones are still solid. MacOS is a boring, but stable corporate alternative if MSFT keeps making their OS worse.

Tesla is not mag7 idgaf what talking head included it, netflix or broadcom take thatcspot

But you have to worry about shit companies like Carvana getting added to the Spy

Can we stop lumping in Tesla with legitimate growth companies?

Based on current prices: - NVDA: 25% - GOOG: 25% - MSFT: 25% - AMZN: 15% - META: 15% - AAPL: 5% - TSLA: -10%

GOOG 25 MSFT 20 AMZN 18 NVDA 15 AAPL 12 META 10 TSLA 0

25% Google 20% Meta 20% Amazon 15% Microsoft 15% Nvidia 5% Apple 0% Tesla Top 3 I think have the best case for AI improving their primary business. Apple is a fully mature company priced as a growth stock but is still a legit cash cow. Tesla is a meme coin.

Google 50% MSFT 25% AMZN 25%

30% GOOG 30% NVDA 15% META 10% AMZN 10% MSFT 4% AAPL 1% TSLA

I would argue that AMZN have an amazing moat. Behind all the AWS, AI, telemed and so on, the online retail business seems to me to be an unassailable monopoly. So when tech shits the bed, AMZN will keep going.

Meta 70% Google 10 % Amazon 10% Nvidia 10% The rest are zeros

More Amazon and Goog, less Microsoft / Meta.

i own both and i trimmed some google bc it ran up a bunch, its still a forever stock its an unreal company, but meta is crazy crazy cheap rn its at a forward p/e of 20 and they will be a winner of ai they have arguably the quickest path to net gain with add optimization and they know how to make an app popular but yeah meta is an 800$ stock today google is about where it should be wouldnt be to crazy for it to go to like 350$ but anything past i would trim a large chunk and wait to reenter

Where's AVGO, and why is TSLA on that list?

I'm probably prejudiced, as I already own 1000 shares of Amazon. Nevertheless, I suspect some folks think the AMZN negative is their high CAPEX spending, which is projected to be $200 billion+ . . . In effect, the 2 negatives are: 1. Zero to very little cash reserves; and, 2. What's their payback going to be on such huge spending? Conversely, MSFT is down currently due to the lukewarm opinion of Co-Pilot. Specifically, although the AI assistant has gained millions of users, its adoption rate remains a small fraction of the total Office 365 user base, leading analysts to worry that the "AI payback period" may take much longer than originally anticipated. Thankfully, I bought AMZN at $215 cost basis, so I am not too concerned about it.

You aren't actually shorting tesla are you? I thought there was going to be shenanigans with taking spacex pubic and rolling it up with tesla. that shits going to get massive upward pressure

You have 2% too much Tesla

Agreed on this

I’d go heavier on AMZN and googl with less Microsoft but WAY less meta and 0 tsla  But tbh this is kinda dumb for lots of reasons.

You're allowed to write shit on the internet

Ehh both Elon companies will attract the same type of investor. When space x comes public it will compete with Tesla for a lot of the same investment dollars.

I would do 0% TSLA, 50% META 50% NVDA, if I was feeling really wild 10% MSFT and 10% GOOG, I would not buy amzn and I would never buy TSLA if my company had it's valuation my small business grossing between 100-200k a year would be valued at like 43 million dollars.

1/3 each GOOG AMZN AAPL

No, but the post said if I had to.

I'm a little bullish about Apple because their new chips are killing it, the local LLM performance is impressive.

Tesla is a legitimate scam company

META still prints cash, same issue as in 2022, Zuck will capitulate

Catching up to who and to what, exactly? Capex ain’t getting cheaper…

I would look at weighing at a different angle. Instead of weighing on either performance or the quality of the business, try weighing them according (under)valuation.  Let's assume company A is undervalued and company B is fairly valued. The growth prospect are the same and they are AI players. I'd consider having a higher weigh percentage for company A compared to company B. Theoretically, if the stock market is correct and evenly distributed, you'll make more money with company a, if this makes sense. Make your high conviction bets, high weighing. Also, I stopped trying to understand why people keep investing in tesla.

Essentially Everyone on this planet loves apple products but stock pickers despise them. Its the other way around for msft.

Robo autoban says otherwise.

They weren't spending as much as competitors on improving their AI products. It's an arms race. They want to catch up to and surpass their competition. What is so hard to understand.

If you want specifically Mag 7 exposure, there's the MAGS ETF, but it's terrible, even if you decide you want exactly seven stocks in your portfolio and are too lazy to buy those seven stocks yourself. The expense ratio is "only" 29 bps, but they use ridiculous return swaps which completely kill their return. I can't think of any reason to do this except so they can be technically considered "diversified", even if this does absolutely nothing to really diversify their portfolio. In the meantime, it means they've trailed just buying the seven stocks by almost 4% per year (and about 20% cumulatively since inception): https://testfol.io/?s=6JU8nboO9Nc Assuming a $1M investment for 30 years, with even a relatively conservative 10% expected return, that 4% real drag will cost you $11.7M over the life of the investment--more than 2/3 of the amount you would have had otherwise. (If you want to assume the Mag 7 will continue delivering 40% per year--which would never happen--then that will cost you $14 billion over the life of the investment.)

I was more so referring to just buying VOO, VT, QQQ, etc...

Great company. I personally spend a ton of money each year on AAPL products, and I was waiting to upgrade an M5 Ultra with 512 GB for exactly this reason (who knows if it will even get released at this point). The reason I only kept AAPL at market weight within the Mag 7 is two-fold: - They have the highest valuation of any Mag 7 (besides TSLA). - They have the lowest growth rate of any Mag 7 (besides TSLA). From Fiscal.ai, but other sources tell a similar story: | Stock | TTM P/E | NTM P/E | Rev CAGR (3 yr) | Dil EPS CAGR (3 yr) | |:--|:--|:--|:--|:--| | NVDA | 36.4 | 24.2 | 68.8% | 86.2% | | AAPL | 31.5 | 28.4 | 4.0% | 10.3% | | GOOGL | 28.3 | 25.5 | 12.5% | 33.4% | | MSFT | 24.3 | 21.4 | 14.4% | 21.1% | | AMZN | 29.1 | 26.3 | 11.7% | 198.3% | | META | 25.8 | 19.5 | 19.9% | 39.8% | | TSLA | 352.1 | 181.1 | 5.2% | (-33.2%) |