← Back to topic list

Tesla discontinues Cybertruck RWD

CarCooler | 2025-09-13 09:54 | 601 views

Comments (149)
AutoModerator 2025-09-13 09:54

**I am a bot. This is a friendly reminder that unwelcoming toxic/griefing/pessimistic sniping comments that are not on topic and don’t move the discussion forward will be removed. A ban will be issued if necessary. Consider this before commenting. Report posts or comments that violate the [Rules](https://www.reddit.com/mod/teslamotors/rules/). Thank you.** If you are unable to find it, use the link to it. We are not a support sub, please make sure to use the proper resources if you have questions: [Official Tesla Support](https://www.tesla.com/support), [r/TeslaLounge](https://www.reddit.com/r/TeslaLounge/) personal content | [Discord Live Chat](https://discord.gg/tesla) for anything. *I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please [contact the moderators of this subreddit](/message/compose/?to=/r/teslamotors) if you have any questions or concerns.*

Elf_Paladin 2025-09-13 09:59

Well that was quick

ecksean1 2025-09-13 10:02

What ever happened to the 35k truck

atomicskiracer 2025-09-13 10:10

It’s be right after the $25k car and the roadster released in 2020

jrherita 2025-09-13 10:18

I get the impression the engineering targets for the CT were a bit too much..

glmory 2025-09-13 10:29

The original ones certainly were pushing their luck. With high volume maybe they could have gotten there though. They got put into a feedback loop where politics + higher than advertised prices kept volume low. Then without volume to drive learning they lost the path to reasonable prices. Hard to see a route out of being a novelty vehicle at this point. A shame, a CEO who didn't get involved with politics and the engineering could have sold millions.

Croathlete 2025-09-13 10:30

They took out too much that was core to the Cybertruck's identity.

EddiewithHeartofGold 2025-09-13 10:33

Reality hit every car maker hard. That's why no one is making a cheap EV truck.

mfkimill 2025-09-13 10:46

Doesn’t matter, tesla is shifting to robots and robots now.

Underwater_Grilling 2025-09-13 10:48

It's still got plenty of audacity

Every_Tap8117 2025-09-13 10:56

And robots

[deleted] 2025-09-13 10:56

[deleted]

KleinUnbottler 2025-09-13 11:09

Politics, advertised price, and **unmet performance specs**. The originally announced specs made it a *value proposition*, especially on the range side. Even if they'd raised the price just keeping up with inflation, the range on the released models is still like 33% below what they advertised. It might be a worse truck than much of the competition, but if it could go 500 miles on a charge while costing less....

mcot2222 2025-09-13 11:12

Slate is doing it. Ford is also doing it with the next gen. Ford and Chevy have cheap(er) models of the Lightning and Silverado selling pretty well.

IAmCletus 2025-09-13 11:17

I get the impression that the whole concept, especially the design for the CT was a bit too much

Thekacz 2025-09-13 11:19

This. I wanted the 500 mile tri-motor.Tesla failed to offer a vehicle that was better than their concept vehicle... Something Elon said they would never do. Smaller vehicle size, smaller battery, less features, and a HUGE price increase.

alphatangolima 2025-09-13 11:28

This is the answer. When I looked at them, I couldn't understand why anyone would buy that version other than they couldn't afford the others. No 240V, no bidirectional charging, lower towing capacity....

Croathlete 2025-09-13 11:35

And tonneau cover! When Elon stood on it for the first time, it was such an amazing discriminator vs other pickup trucks! Taking that out plus everything you listed just made it worse than the other EV pickup options.

NerdyGuy117 2025-09-13 11:50

It’s a $27k truck/suv that can tow less than the model y. Seriously, a towing capacity of 1,000 lbs? For $5k more I can get a used model y, more range, more power, more towing capacity, faster charging.

NerdyGuy117 2025-09-13 11:53

Was anyone buying the RWD version though? It cut so many features out

jrherita 2025-09-13 12:01

The target demographics for expensive truck buyers generally lean "red" -- It's not the politics but the "missing the specs and cost significantly" part that's killed the CT. I think the big range and cost miss comes from the 4680 cells not panning out as expected. (+ a lot of inflation in the last 5 years since Covid changed the economy).

savageotter 2025-09-13 12:02

They really thought the batteries would be better than they turned out to be

billm0066 2025-09-13 12:18

I don’t think his politics affected the cybertruck sales much. I think it’s looks and cost.

billm0066 2025-09-13 12:19

What happened to my low cost of anything. Cybertruck was announced in 2019 when everything was a lot cheaper.

johnnyXcrane 2025-09-13 12:23

in my opinion if you cant afford the AWD then you also cant really afford the RWD. Its such a little price jump and the car is so much better.

Oneinterestingthing 2025-09-13 12:31

When is the semi truck going into full production, what a drag of a project…??

BadRegEx 2025-09-13 12:32

Same thing happened with the model 3.  The RWD has gone away and come back several times. Tesla does this to drive revenue.

meepstone 2025-09-13 12:32

Yup, battery day expectations weren't met.

iceynyo 2025-09-13 12:43

Only the cyberbeast missed it's range target. The AWD actually has slightly better range than initially announced.

Snoo93079 2025-09-13 12:51

Disagree a little. It went from being unique looking vehicle to divisive and a rolling MAGA hat.

ZeroWashu 2025-09-13 12:55

This was all about price and performance, it was dead as soon as pricing was announced and the RWD variant was just ridiculous for how much was stripped out of it. What idiot though removing power connections was a good idea? At most dropping all wheel steering, all wheel drive, the fancy suspension, and automatic cover, should have sufficed but someone set out to make it as unattractive as possible - well they succeeded.

Robbbbbbbbb 2025-09-13 12:57

Just proves that this stripped out version was a compliance car at its core. Now that the tax credit is going away in a few weeks, Tesla has no incentive to produce it.

TheCourierMojave 2025-09-13 13:00

We are about at the limit of physics for batteries. There isn't much better they can be at the moment.

-CaptainFormula- 2025-09-13 13:00

It was never in danger of selling millions.

TheCourierMojave 2025-09-13 13:00

90% of people with trucks aren't towing shit.

ResponsibleFan3414 2025-09-13 13:02

Can’t afford isn’t the right way to phrase it. I can afford any of these cars. They’re just not worth that much.

Enginerdiest 2025-09-13 13:05

Yeah, it’s kinda disingenuous to say it’s the “RWD” model because so much about it is different.

sherlocknoir 2025-09-13 13:14

It never made sense. I was just looking at new inventory yesterday and you can get a new AWD demo with 300 miles for $70K. Why would anybody purchase a RWD for $65K. If you are already spending $65,000.. what’s the point of saving $5000 for a RWD truck significantly slower 0-60mph?

Terrible_Tutor 2025-09-13 13:15

Dont forget robots

psalm_69 2025-09-13 13:17

To be fair.. they probably sold like one or two of them. They couldn't overcome the high base cost of the vehicle, even by cutting features to the point that it was completely unappealing. I'm in the minority on Reddit and actually love the truck, but it's just too expensive. It's already Tesla's lowest margin vehicle, I just don't see how it can succeed long term. Maybe if they move a lot of its systems to the other vehicles to bring cost down?

psalm_69 2025-09-13 13:21

So much this. Elon fucked the CT by openly getting into politics right when it rolled out. It became associated with that movement, and any hype was instantly crushed. It needed high volume to succeed. I think it's only hope of surviving now is if they move features like the 48 volt system, steer by, wire etc. to the other vehicles. They need to get those costs down through volume.

throwaway123454321 2025-09-13 13:27

The diminished acceleration is the least the difference between those two models

dubie4x8 2025-09-13 13:42

As an actual fan of the CT, I’d never recommend this trim to anyone. Too many features missing and the price is still too high.

elephantskilledme 2025-09-13 14:02

I agree. First vehicle for me that was over promised and under delivered. Lost of range was a huge deal for me. All the accessories they showed haven’t been promised. Price point is hard too

JustforU 2025-09-13 14:09

Imagine if Elon had kept his mouth shut and pushed for a design that was actually feasible. That would have driven revenue.

whalechasin 2025-09-13 14:09

Slate is at the same stage as the 2020 Roadster

vngell 2025-09-13 14:13

All this trim was doing is making the cybertruck look cheap on paper! Get rid of this forever. lol I love my cyberbeast. Cloth seats on a cybertruck is wild. 🤣

TheBendit 2025-09-13 14:14

Battery density has improvemed about 6% per year and shows no signs of stopping. We are maybe 10% of the way to the theoretical limits for lithium.

dailytrippple 2025-09-13 14:15

Now, cancel the rest of it and move on.

Proteatron 2025-09-13 14:16

I think the polarizing design also pushed it from what Tesla succeeded at early on - making electric cars cool. Other companies made electric cars weird to differentiate them from their ICE lineup, but Tesla made relatively normal looking EVs. Even if you like the Cybertruck, I think it's fair to say it's a weird looking vehicle, and the appearance does drive any big functionality. With a wrap I think they look pretty good, but that's at least $5k added on top of an already expensive vehicle.

g1aiz 2025-09-13 14:18

They have not finished the factory yet

EvenConsideration840 2025-09-13 14:30

They removed so many critical features. It was half the truck with very little movement in price. I'm just waiting patiently for a CyberSUV or a Minivan killer. Immediate preorder if they do it

[deleted] 2025-09-13 14:34

They still left the triangle.

fyrewal 2025-09-13 14:39

If it actually looked like a truck and not a stainless steel triangle, it would have sold so incredibly well. Even at $100,000.

Glittering-Visual167 2025-09-13 14:45

All RWD Tesla should be removed from sale. The CT RWD is absolutely a slouch and isn’t recommended. No smugglers bay, no wade mode, no this no that it’s basic and not worth the coin unless you’re not a truck guy

FSUxNOLES101 2025-09-13 14:57

Ahaha 😂

jabroni4545 2025-09-13 14:58

Why does rivian r1t not sell incredibly well, along with other ev trucks? Price.

FSUxNOLES101 2025-09-13 14:58

100%

fyrewal 2025-09-13 15:07

EV trucks don’t sell well because they have downsides when they are performing “truck” duties. Range in an EV truck can be phenomenal, especially when you have a 200 kWh battery like the Silverado EV. But as soon as you start towing, or hauling something, your range goes right in the toilet. However, I should point out that weight is not the defining characteristic of range loss in an EV, a YouTuber actually proved this recently. Robert from AgingWheels actually found that much of the range loss from towing or hauling is aerodynamic loss from increased aerodynamic drag. [YouTube video about range loss from towing/hauling](https://youtu.be/UmKf8smvGsA?si=DPmgLKqbqvHVZNPy) Edit: I missed my original point. Teslas sell well because they are Teslas. Rivian still isn’t playing at the same level of tech that Tesla has in their vehicles. People just like the Tesla experience more. If you slapped a Tesla badge on a R1T and gave it Tesla software and UI? That would be a big seller.

TheCourierMojave 2025-09-13 15:23

What? The limit for the lithium ion batteries in use today is like 450Wh isn't it? We need to move to new technology like lithium air batteries to get higher Watt hours.

[deleted] 2025-09-13 15:27

[removed]

rainer_d 2025-09-13 15:36

> A shame, a CEO who didn't get involved with politics and the engineering could have sold millions. While I absolute hated Elon getting into politics *like that*, I doubt it would have made a substantial difference in the end. Exhibit A: None of the other trucks sell better. Certainly not in the millions. I would argue that most truck-owners simply don't want (and often simply cannot afford) an EV truck that is more expensive than a cheap gas truck. Arguable, trucks aren't really ideal in EV-form at all. We get by in Europe mostly without them. I hope Tesla uses this opportunity to make room in the factory to make the six-seat YL in the states (and elsewhere). That looks to be a much more profitable car. Maybe they surprise us and use the stretched Y as a base for a "small" truck that can actually make it to Europe? With LFP batteries, that would be a great workhorse.

rainer_d 2025-09-13 15:37

That thing without all-wheel-steering would be a nightmare, I fear.

rainer_d 2025-09-13 15:41

I think Elon could actually do this - if he really wanted. Though that would certainly raise questions about accountability. After all, it's probably cost 10 figures already. Well, at least he's not into boats and sponsoring sports-clubs. Or horse-racing ;-)

meowed 2025-09-13 15:47

I agree with you but consider being more friendly next time

sparx_fast 2025-09-13 15:47

Exactly. The exoskeleton design became vaporware and you basically have bonded stainless over a steel structure. The stainless probably should have been deleted once the structure changed. It wasn't supposed to be like the Delorean with bonded panels.

Scoutron 2025-09-13 15:51

What makes you a fan of it? I was turned off because of the aluminum frame (and not being able to afford it), I’m genuinely curious what makes people enjoy these other than it just being unique

MoarSocks 2025-09-13 16:00

cheerful capable cooing work shy piquant friendly slim hobbies different *This post was mass deleted and anonymized with [Redact](https://redact.dev/home)*

Jellis03 2025-09-13 16:15

I am not buying a cybertruck only because of the way it looks otherwise I’d have one on order now. So I agree 100%!

ObeseSnake 2025-09-13 16:35

It also has manual crank windows. 😃

NerdyGuy117 2025-09-13 16:50

100% with the Slate won’t be either

NerdyGuy117 2025-09-13 16:52

Strangely I don’t hate that all that much. Sounds like you can upgrade it to power windows.

Underwater_Karma 2025-09-13 16:57

There isn't a single EV truck on the market with a full sized bed. The Rivian is only 4.5 feet. That's not a truck for people who need a truck.

EddiewithHeartofGold 2025-09-13 17:12

Come on. Let's be factual. Neither of those is out yet. I am sure a lot of buyers will get them when they do come out at the promised price.

Present-Ad-9598 2025-09-13 17:26

That’s how Tesla operates, trims go by RWD, AWD, and tri-motor

Tusker89 2025-09-13 17:28

>That's literally what fucking afford means. You are aggressively incorrect. Being able to afford something has little to do with its value or what its worth.

transfixedtruth 2025-09-13 18:08

Worse truck design rolled out, ever. Not one bit sad to see it go. They look like perfect hangouts for racoons. No manufacture is trying to make efficient cars or truck, no more incentives and one cares about that. The industry is all about pushing crap and big money and bigger profit.

sherlocknoir 2025-09-13 18:18

I’ll be honest. I don’t even know what the other differences are. I just know RWD does 0-60 in 6.2 seconds.. while AWD does it in 4.1 seconds. That is significant enough. Before we even get to any discussion on the extra traction of AWD. I would not buy any truck without AWD or a tow hitch.

Kendrome 2025-09-13 18:23

If you can afford them then it's basically a no brainer, but others might be just on the line of being able to.

KleinUnbottler 2025-09-13 18:24

The $70k model was supposed to be the high end one with 500 miles of range. The current $75K dual motor has 340 miles and that price is only recently the same as the 60K announced inflation adjusted. Maybe I'm suffering from anchoring bias, but in any case, they over-promised and under-delivered.

throwaway123454321 2025-09-13 18:28

The single motor version does not have a motorized Tono cover, it doesn’t have leather seats, but rather cloth seats, it doesn’t have the electric power out in the back, it doesn’t have the air lift in the shocks, only regular metal shocks, among a merit of other differences to make a huge difference in the quality of theexperience

KuZagan 2025-09-13 18:28

Having worked in service for Tesla, if you can barely afford any of the cars (or any new car really) you cannot afford the car

Kendrome 2025-09-13 18:31

It's a spectrum and different people balance money in various ways and make different amounts of money. When I say barely, I mean barely within a workable budget.

54321vek 2025-09-13 18:33

Tesla doesn’t understand what truck buyers want. Can’t believe they haven’t hired someone from Chevy or Fords truck division yet.

sherlocknoir 2025-09-13 18:33

Wow!

Kind_Walk_4692 2025-09-13 18:37

What happened to autonomous driving in 2018?

Enginerdiest 2025-09-13 18:38

I'm not disagreeing. I'm saying it's misleading.

Tesla0ptimus 2025-09-13 18:44

With the seating configuration of the Model Y L!

con247 2025-09-13 18:46

The point of the appearance was supposed to be that it was an exoskeleton Since that went out the window they should have just built a normal truck

CatHistorical184 2025-09-13 18:59

This trim will be worth a million in50 yrs.

Radium 2025-09-13 19:22

I didn't want a RWD cybertruck, did anyone really? It was still too expensive, especially for a RWD. My bet is they drop the price on the AWD here after the incentive goes away. Either that or they come out with a cheaper truck in the near term 1-2 years.

pachewychomp 2025-09-13 19:24

And no secure locking of the truck bed. Like, what the heck? lol.

EvenConsideration840 2025-09-13 19:43

100%!! When they announced it everybody seems super excited. The Y is a fantastic vehicle but it is no replacement for a 4Runner or a Sienna. If Tesla launches an SUV, it's over

makoblade 2025-09-13 19:47

In its current state the cybertruck just isn't worth the asking cost. It's optimistically a $50k truck, but nothing about it is noteworthy in a positive way so a sane person isn't likely to consider it over any other truck.

spacebarstool 2025-09-13 20:06

At slow speeds, the biggest impact on range is the rolling resistance of the tires on the ground. At highway speeds, aerodynamics affects range the most. When you tow, you are increasing the rolling resistance as well as aerodynamic drag. You get a double whammy.

spacebarstool 2025-09-13 20:08

The CT's 6' 4" bed isn't full sized? Are 8 foot beds the full size you mean?

Cmee4svc 2025-09-13 20:09

They should discontinue the whole truck it’s hideous.

itsmontoya 2025-09-13 20:11

I see Rivians all over the Pacific Northwest

spacebarstool 2025-09-13 20:11

It's the most comfortable pickup truck I have ever driven. It rides like a sedan, turns like a sedan, and is very comfortable like a car. It's powerful, it's fast, and it just works great as a truck. With the 240-volt outlets on it, I was able to ditch my home generator for when I lose power. Now I just plug the truck into the house, and all is well. The truck battery will power my house for 5 days before I need to recharge the truck. That's amazing. Also I have a fetish for being flipped off by strangers while I'm driving down the road. That's great. It turns me on.

spacebarstool 2025-09-13 20:16

It is an amazing vehicle. I've owned trucks my whole life. I'm old now, too, so I've driven so many trucks. The CT is the most comfortable and best handling truck I've ever been in.

watergoesdownhill 2025-09-13 20:21

I think it's selling about right for its price point. Looks regardless. It's not like any of the other electronic trucks are selling any better at that price point.

Scoutron 2025-09-13 20:27

Lmao people actually do that? I drive a Tesla in Texas and when I’m out in the real rural areas I’ve noticed diesels always seem to expel more smoke near me, but otherwise normal

altdelete47 2025-09-13 20:33

Maybe go grab a snack.

spacebarstool 2025-09-13 20:42

Thumbs down, and middle fingers are what I get. It was bad last summer, but this summer, it's toned way down. What's interesting is that Prius owners have done it the most.

SnazzyLabs 2025-09-13 20:52

Past owner. Great truck. But it does not ride or turn like a sedan lmao

F1andDoner 2025-09-13 20:59

So about $200k in today’s dollars

jcrckstdy 2025-09-13 22:12

talking out of your ass is not engineering

jrherita 2025-09-13 22:42

Were you there in the discussion rooms before they announced the CT or are you also talking out your ass? :)

yetiflask 2025-09-13 22:43

And you're dead wrong.

userlivewire 2025-09-13 22:49

Surely the margins on this one were the best because they stripped out so much.

[deleted] 2025-09-13 22:52

Something better is coming in its place most likely

Tusker89 2025-09-13 23:00

I don't know what else to tell you. "Afford" ***literally*** does not mean worth. You can disagree but you would be wrong.

gre-0021 2025-09-14 00:36

Eh kinda but really. Model 3 and Y Performance still only have 2 motors, they just output more power. Thats why they go by the Long Range and Performance trim names

TheKingOfSwing777 2025-09-14 01:39

Wen range extender

damonlebeouf 2025-09-14 03:20

because rivian unfortunately can not support the vehicles they sell. their warranty service is abysmal.

Present-Ad-9598 2025-09-14 04:09

Obviously not the vehicles with only two motors🫩

Present-Ad-9598 2025-09-14 04:10

I don’t see how, it’s a lower trim so it’s gonna have less features, it’s not like everything isn’t listed out on the website, I don’t think they ever really planned on people buying many RWD, since it’s not much more expensive to get the better models

bobsil1 2025-09-14 05:16

The point was to meme the stock, great success

Agile-Cancel-4709 2025-09-14 05:20

Most other automakers don’t tie trim to powertrain layout.

NewMY2020 2025-09-14 06:30

They need to cut their losses on this truck, with elon spouting all this nonsense and hurting global sales. The CT is a hard sell to begin with cause of it's design. Why make that more difficult, Tesla and their shareholders need to really think about the future of this company.

gre-0021 2025-09-14 14:05

You said “That’s how Tesla operates”. And thats it. Asterisks and exclusions aren’t “obvious” or lumped into your general statement for you, that’s why they exist

BrendoBoy17 2025-09-14 17:16

I didn’t even know there was a rwd option

Xclusivsmoment 2025-09-14 19:31

I think that is only because Tesla was around first. Idk when both companies started but i imagine its Tesla.

Present-Ad-9598 2025-09-14 21:55

Yea and most other automakers suck

Quin1617 2025-09-14 23:33

COVID and the ensuing inflation screwed everyone over, from governments all the way down to customers/individuals. 2019 was quite literally a different era. It would’ve been in Tesla’s best interests for the Cybertruck to cost $35k, but it simply winded up being unfeasible.

320sim 2025-09-15 01:32

Not that much cheaper. Somehow every other EV truck managed to not double their prices

ArterialVotives 2025-09-15 06:25

Rivian sold approx. 1,750 R1Ts in Q2 2025. That is a trivial amount of pick-ups. Ford sold 222,459 F-series trucks in the same period. You notice the Rivians all over because they are rare and stick out.

Bigpandacloud5 2025-09-15 06:49

Inflation isn't high enough to explain the gigantic increase, and he said it would be $35k, not that it would be $35k+inflation.

Bigpandacloud5 2025-09-15 06:50

Inflation isn't high enough to explain the gigantic increase, so it probably was never feasible, especially when you consider that Elon loves to make absurd promises.

Big-Economics-1495 2025-09-15 07:40

How did it even handle?

Armoredpolecat 2025-09-15 08:05

Misleading is a crazy word to use when the website clearly sums up the features of each version before buying. If you can’t be bothered to read 5 lines of text before dropping 80K you kind of deserve buyers remorse. That’s like saying the BMW 330i is a misleading name because it only mentions engine size (which is even incorrect in a bunch of models) but it doesn’t mention it has completely different interior/suspension/brakes from the M3.

payneok 2025-09-15 13:13

This was dumb from the start. I never thought it was supposed to be a real product. More of a "reference product" to make people see what a good deal the AWD CT was. Good Riddance.

Dr_Pippin 2025-09-15 13:14

The Cybertruck's bed is only a couple inches shorter than my Tundra's bed. I have never been in a situation with my truck where those 2" had any meaningful impact on my ability to haul anything. How long do you think the Cybertruck's bed is?

Underwater_Karma 2025-09-15 15:32

a full sized bed is 8 feet, the cybertruck bed is 6 feet. I don't know what else to tell you

Xaxxon 2025-09-15 18:21

they should just discontinue the other models, too. What a failed experiment. It achieved none of the stated goals from the initial announcement. Cost to make, Price, Range, "exoskeleton", lots of features dropped.

Xaxxon 2025-09-15 18:21

\#1 they took out was "a good truck at a sane price"

Xaxxon 2025-09-15 18:22

Names matter. That's why companies constantly play games with naming things.

Xaxxon 2025-09-15 18:23

When you look for them you occasionally see them. But not compared to other trucks. Source: I live in Seattle.

Xaxxon 2025-09-15 18:24

The $25k did actually ship. And even after adjusting for inflation, the ct drastically missed it's mark.

Xaxxon 2025-09-15 18:24

Turns out it's hard and they're still in front. Don't compare Tesla to their claims, compare them to the competition. Semi is still in good shape. CT is a debacle.

Xaxxon 2025-09-15 18:25

If they'd come anywhere near their price targets the shape wouldn't matter. The problem is that it's too expensive.

Xaxxon 2025-09-15 18:25

It's irrelevant how CT sells and Elon thinks it's cool, so it stays.

Dr_Pippin 2025-09-15 19:16

I don't consider my Tundra's 6.5' bed "not full size." Sorry. Actually, the more I think about it, I'm not sorry, because you are the one using the wrong terminology. It's not a full size bed, it's either a short bed, a standard bed, or a long bed. My full size truck has a standard length bed. Basically the same as the Cybertruck. "a truck for people who need a truck" Ha. I've hauled many stack of 10 and 12 foot sheets of drywall in my "apparently not a truck" Tundra with a 6.5' bed. You really just don't know what you're talking about.

xrv1ck 2025-09-15 22:28

I would have bought a minivan killer in jan of this year if it was available

EvenConsideration840 2025-09-15 23:11

Same here

Late-Masterpiece-452 2025-09-17 06:14

Next up: „Tesla discontinues Cybertruck“

henkkaj_73 2025-09-17 12:24

Another hoax, this summer they decided not to produce them after all despite people having ordered and partially pre-paid their extra battery packs.

TheKingOfSwing777 2025-09-17 12:54

Lol I know. Saw it coming from miles away.

Anstigmat 2025-10-08 17:43

I'm seeing so many people defending their Cybertruck choice in such weird ways. You can just say you like it. You don't have to make it complicated. I can break down the target demos of all the available 'truck' EVs pretty easily. 1. R1T: Moderate high earning Granola types. You want to put your MTN bikes or camping gear in the back. Maybe you tow a boat 2x a year. I am this person but without the money. 2. Ford/Chevy: You are an early adopter but have owned these brands before. You need a fleet vehicle for light to medium duty truck things. 3. CT: You still like the Musk brand, and want a vehicle that turns heads. A bold statement maker. You can accept that it would actually look kinda dumb filled with mulch bags, but that's not the point. When it comes to 'truck stuff' in actual reality the vehicle that still makes the most 'sense,' and will for the foreseeable future, is a 5 year old Taco with 80k miles on it. That's why in regards to Point 1, I drive a 23' Ridgeline. I'd get the R1T if I could afford it!

Add comment

Login is required to comment.

Login with Google