← Back to topic list

Elon demonstrating the new CyberCab

CoralinesButtonEye | 2024-10-12 05:33 | 5 views

Comments (38)
[deleted] 2024-10-12 12:03

[deleted]

CoralinesButtonEye 2024-10-12 12:15

![gif](giphy|S9f7FVSU0TUzLKCx7A|downsized)

KeyboardGunner 2024-10-12 12:17

My bad, I didn't see the end bit.

Tribolonutus 2024-10-12 12:55

Surely someone was responsible for security and that no car will drive over someone, but I’m really interested, how much of it was real and how much was remotely controlled.

Mront 2024-10-12 13:13

Depends on what you mean by "real". It was "real" as in "not remotely controlled", I'm almost 100% certain of that. But it was driving in a small, private closed area that was pre-scanned and prepared specifically for this presentation - not sure how "real" that is for you.

Tribolonutus 2024-10-12 13:24

By “Real” I mean: was it on the level of Model 3 driving on itself, or was it (as you wrote), pre-scanned and prepared closed area “real”.

HellveticaNeue 2024-10-12 14:15

It was held on a movie set for a reason.

LonghornInNebraska 2024-10-12 14:19

Insurance companies are have dropped the Cyber Truck because it's a massive liability. What company is going to insure a car where the driver has no control of the vehicle? Owning this car is asking for someone to file a massive lawsuit against you.

Racer20 2024-10-12 14:46

Have you been in a Tesla? FSD could easily drive that route with no control. The reason it was on a studio lot is probably because the cars themselves look like very early mockups without validated bodies or chassis. They couldn’t close an entire city block or whatever to do it.

Limos42 2024-10-12 14:49

/r/unexpected

[deleted] 2024-10-12 15:01

They haven't. Do you have a source for that other than the Reddit thread floating around the other day?

[deleted] 2024-10-12 15:02

It was real. They chose the lot because it's technically private property so they're allows to use driverless cars there easily. It was controlled in that there are obviously people keeping the guests in the right areas so they wouldn't get in the way But my Model Y would absolutely do these drives just fine today, unaided. No question

Mront 2024-10-12 15:05

> FSD could easily drive that route with no control. No it couldn't, FSD doesn't work without driver supervision. We can "woulda coulda shoulda" this all night long, but at this point in time I'm not gonna pretend that Tesla cars can fully self-drive, when until this point in time even Tesla themselves didn't trust FSD enough to actually start applying for self-driving permits.

Racer20 2024-10-12 15:08

I’ve driven 60miles door to door with no intervention. But sure, no way it could drive slowly around a curated route without remote control. Impossible.

Racer20 2024-10-12 15:09

Either you edited your post or I replied to the wrong person. You said it wasn’t remotely controlled, which was my point as well. Sorry.

iceynyo 2024-10-12 15:14

That's the point of this event, they're announcing their intent to start using FSD in limited areas with self-driving permits... Showing off a car without steering wheel is proof of that. But I think the event was pretty premature if that intent is manifesting months or a year later. Meanwhile I'll continue to have my car drive me around every day with basically no input on my part.

iceynyo 2024-10-12 15:16

> Insurance companies are have dropped the Cyber Truck because it's a massive liability. Wrong, it was just Geico, and they only  dropped a single Cybertruck policy because the owner had the wrong type of insurance for their use.

feurie 2024-10-12 15:40

It was prepped but why wouldn't it be at least as capable as the Model 3 currently is?

feurie 2024-10-12 15:41

FSD works just fine without supervision. Tesla just requires it.

feurie 2024-10-12 15:41

Please stop being misinformed.

[deleted] 2024-10-12 15:51

>private closed area that was pre-scanned and prepared specifically for this presentation - not sure how "real" that is for you. Well given that they can just put the same software on it as model 3, i would be willing to bet a lot that it was using the same FSD, might be a fork of it, made spesifically for cap mode. but i'd still assume this thing could easily drive you around the city with few issues. tho there might be some issues if you take 10 rides thought the city, just going of the current available fsd

TCOLSTATS 2024-10-12 16:49

I mean, you're aware that all Tesla vehicles bought in the past 8 or so years could easily do that drive? Literally just place a point on the map and it would go there.

Moedaman 2024-10-12 17:28

lol this was funny.

rabbitwonker 2024-10-12 17:52

I think it was basically both — basically the same FSD as the 3 & Y, but a special build that includes a lot of extra training footage for that specific area. To some extent, it probably *had* to use the specialized training, because the Cab has different dimensions and exact camera positions (e.g. how many cm from the ground is each camera, etc.), so the model has to be trained up with Cab footage to work reliably at all. Same reason it’s taking a while for FSD to come out on Cybertruck.

rabbitwonker 2024-10-12 17:55

Also it wouldn’t be legal to have cars without manual controls driving on public roads.

Blue_Kayak 2024-10-12 18:24

I thoroughly enjoyed this and was happy I waited until the end.

Alias-Chosen 2024-10-12 18:32

You haven’t been to San Francisco lately huh?

mirthfun 2024-10-12 18:55

They had y and 3 driving around too.

The_Don_Papi 2024-10-12 19:05

Insurance will love autonomous cars. Owners will still be legally required to have insurance and have to pay a premium on the 0.0001% that a self driving car will wreck itself. At some point it will be free money for insurance companies.

schaudhery 2024-10-12 22:22

Ever heard of Elon Mode for FSD? https://www.theverge.com/2023/6/20/23767041/tesla-hacker-elon-mode-hands-free-full-self-driving-autopilot

schaudhery 2024-10-12 22:23

Bingo. https://www.theverge.com/2023/6/20/23767041/tesla-hacker-elon-mode-hands-free-full-self-driving-autopilot

JebryathHS 2024-10-12 22:29

Yeah this was a drive on clean, marked streets that they would have made sure were in their maps, and they had no traffic anywhere near it.  I don't have much faith in FSD but this is obviously within its capabilities. Not sure how well it'll deal with the explosions but I'm not sure what to do about that myself.

haarschmuck 2024-10-13 05:40

Waymo has cars with nobody in the drivers seat driving on public roads every day and every night.

rabbitwonker 2024-10-13 05:49

True dat. Of course that required special permission— and showing that the cars can be safe in public driverless. Tesla’s FSD is not there yet. Also just easier to have an agreement with a single private entity. And of course you want boundaries set up so only your invitees are participating.

TheJoker516 2024-10-13 06:55

And boom goes the dynamite

tyrellcartboxer 2024-10-13 21:04

Did he leave after getting in the car, without talking to any of the fans?

[deleted] 2025-04-01 02:26

Ghey

CoralinesButtonEye 2025-04-01 06:38

dang this feels like it was posted forever ago

Add comment

Login is required to comment.

Login with Google