← Back to topic list

Is a novated lease on ev worthwhile?

CCheeze | 2026-01-23 13:40 | 22 views

Comments (33)
[deleted] 2026-01-23 13:50

[deleted]

in_and_out_burger 2026-01-23 21:37

Yes by a mile. Anyone who says no doesnt understand the difference between gross and net costs.

btherl 2026-01-23 22:14

I just signed up for one. It's so ludicrously worthwhile that we need reform here, it unfairly advantages high income earners. I'm all for supporting EV use, but not like this.

Tommyaka 2026-01-23 22:18

Yes, I took out a novated lease and over next, the 5-year term I'm expected to save over $17,000. This includes GST savings and being able to reduce my taxable income.

codyforkstacks 2026-01-24 00:54

That’s 17000 compared to what you’d pay if you otherwise financed your car, rather than buying it outright, correct?

Tommyaka 2026-01-24 00:55

$17,000 compared to buying outright.

codyforkstacks 2026-01-24 00:59

Wow, which lease company? Whenever I’ve got a quote it seems that, of the tax benefit, the leasing company is taking the lions share of the profit and I’m saving a few grand mostly because it means I can keep money in my offset compared to buying outright

Tommyaka 2026-01-24 01:01

Smartleasing. Everyone's circumstances are different. I was able to obtain a cheaper interest rate thanks to my clean credit record. Are you considering the GST savings and all the income tax savings? Of course the higher your income the more income tax you save too.

codyforkstacks 2026-01-24 01:05

I’m just comparing what what I actually pay (in terms of impact on my net pay over the lease term plus the balloon payment) compared to the cost of buying outright, factoring in the benefit re mortgage offset.

Tommyaka 2026-01-24 01:15

I don't think that's the best way of comparing because what comes out of your pay also includes insurance, maintenance, and running costs. By calculating all the tax savings you can figure out how much you actually save through a novated lease agreement.

codyforkstacks 2026-01-24 01:32

Yes I factor in those additional things

farqueue2 2026-01-24 08:12

Until you get made redundant 3 months in....

[deleted] 2026-01-24 10:54

[deleted]

farqueue2 2026-01-24 11:17

Not sure if they all have that. My lease company certainly didn't mention it. Just gave me the option to transfer to another company or convert to finance.

No_Violinist_4557 2026-01-25 00:48

Whenever I do the novated lease calcs it ends up looking like a complete rip off. Maybe I'm doing something wrong. new BYD Shark $52k Fortnightly repayments $680 over 5 years Residual payment after 5 years - $17 k Total = $90'000+!

No_Violinist_4557 2026-01-25 01:01

It's also quoting me a fortune on tyres and insurance. $2200 for insurance, I currently pay $900 on an Amarok.

sween64 2026-01-25 02:21

Most companies let you source your own insurance/tyres. You claim the costs back. Anything extra will come back to you at the end of the lease.

sween64 2026-01-25 02:22

Check out [this calculator.](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1CtpBXmuhRW3HrBjqJqnPeFhOfqCbPK-wXA17oz_1fuA/copy) And read [the guide.](https://novatedlease.guide/)

changyang1230 2026-01-25 02:27

Something is quite wrong with the figure you got quoted.  Either you have some ridiculously expensive insurance bundled in, or your 680 per fortnight is a pre-tax figure rather than true take-home impact.  Could you double check which is the case?

No_Violinist_4557 2026-01-25 02:34

Ah might be pre tax. It was just a quick calculation from Smartleasing

OriginalGoldstandard 2026-01-25 06:03

Individual. Is worth it for me!

masteraal 2026-01-25 12:00

Shark 6 isn't a pure EV. Only fully electric gets the FBT benefits unfortunately

WndProc 2026-01-25 16:16

You don’t get the tax break on a hybrid, has to be pure EV

Current_Gear_9482 2026-01-25 23:20

Depends on your income. Who pays for the running costs What are the ftb implications Etc

campy_203 2026-01-26 00:37

Why? It’s a means based thing. High income earners have the means to buy it outright or via conventional leasing if they want, but they wouldn’t as it’s a bad financial decision. This allows a good portion of the population to buy EVs via a financially sound method. How would you propose to incentivize low income earners to purchase $30k+ electric vehicles via a sound financial scheme?

btherl 2026-01-26 02:47

EVs could be GST free, that's 10% off already. And it gives the same benefit to anyone, regardless of their income. That's fair to everyone, and doesn't distribute wealth away from low earners, and toward high earners. And if it's going to be means based, there should be more benefit for lower income earners, and less benefit for higher income earners. FBT exists for a reason - so high earners can't restructure to evade tax. If the incentive is means based, but weighted toward lower earner, then the people you're taking about will be able to afford an EV.

bigfatteddy 2026-01-26 14:27

You don't get tax benefits for hybrids

bigfatteddy 2026-01-26 14:28

Just use your own insurance.

jack_of_the_people 2026-01-27 02:15

In 3-5 years, there will be a flood of second hand EVs, at an appropriate price for low income earners.

btherl 2026-01-27 02:29

That's true. It's definitely not an argument for continuing the FBT exemption though.

Spilling_The_Tee 2026-03-09 03:26

Was the discounted interest rate offered up front or did you push the sales consultant? I'm mid-quote with Smart at the moment.

Tommyaka 2026-03-09 03:33

The new rate was automatically applied after they completed a credit assessment. It's not something that was offered or something I had requested.

Spilling_The_Tee 2026-03-09 03:48

Thank you 😊

Add comment

Login is required to comment.

Login with Google